Spyke
linuxยทLinuxbyN00b22

Suggest me a distro

I have already tried out Linux Mint. But I want to try out other distros.

PC specs:

  • Intel Core i5-10400

  • 16 GB of RAM DDR4

  • 1 TB NVME SSD

  • 256 GB SATA SSD

  • Intel UHD 630

View original on lemmy.ml
N00b22reply
lemmy.ml

No way that actually exists lol

5

Once I get tired of Gentoo, Iโ€™m going to try NixOS again.

1

Been using it since the start of the pandemic. It's exactly what I want.

2
lemmy.world

I'm using Fedora and I'm really happy with it. Pretty solid distro,

10
samsyreply
feddit.de

I don't like what RedHat is actually doing, but yes Fedora is the successor.

2

I'm not happy with RedHat neither. And Fedora 40 considering to add telemetry doesn't help. I love Fedora tho, but if RHEL keeps heading the way is going I'll hop to another distro.

Maybe is time to try Arch and embrace the meme (and learn, I'm a lil scared)

1
lemmy.fmhy.ml

I can't confirm that (I distro hopped to NixOS) I can confirm that Arch is a solid distro worth learning and will give you the skills to manage it long-term. Compared to Arch based distros like Manjaro, EndeavorOS and Garuda where people tend to screw up their install easily when installing the wrong packages from the AUR and updating with dependency conflicts.

6

I tried manjaro, it was a total mess after a few days of setting it up. Decided to just nuke it and go with arch and I've never looked back. Been 5 years now :)

4

to reconfigure some systemd services, switched to Artix (runit flavored btw)

Artix is definitely better than Arch. (using dinit flavor btw)

1

Pop!_OS is excellent. I came from Mac and Ubuntu and I have had an excellent experience. It can be as out-of-the-box or as customizable as you want. The support is superb. Everything works. Zero downside.

5

I haven't really used Pop!_OS! yet, but I am getting a System76 laptop so I'll definitely check it out. I hope they get their Cosmic desktop out soon so they can differentiate their distro more instead of being another fork with a few customizations and default apps.

4

havent tried it yet. As Im relying on nvidia drivers Im still worshipping X11.

but from what I have heard sway is simply the wayland clone of i3wm?

2
curioushomreply
lemmy.one

I'd like to try Wayland + Sway. Do you have any recommendations for a starting config?

1

Thanks for the pointers, those will be a good reference. Now I just need to get started with a beginner how to!

1

Debian stable but be careful though, you might never leave after using it for a while :)

8
iopqreply
latte.isnot.coffee

Personally, I'm looking for reproducible environments where if you create a lock file of your packages, you will get the exact same system on another machine if you copy it over

1

I'm already using NixOS, which is even more powerful since it can configure my software as well as my system

1

Ah ha!

It uses low-level mechanisms from the Nix package manager, but packages are defined as native Guile module

Lol I am actually glad there aren't two completely separate implementations... Now to install the hurd kernel...

2

It's great and I'm using it, but I don't think someone coming from Linux Mint should use it right away. It can get quite complex even coming from Arch or Artix Linux.

1

There are some really mixed answers here. I would stick to the mainline distros and not go for a fork with a few customizations. It does depend on what you want, especially if you are willing to learn using the terminal and if you want bleeding edge or more stability. My list would be:

  • Debian
  • Kubuntu
  • Fedora
  • Pop!_OS
  • Arch Linux (If you want to learn Linux from its fundamentals)
6

Right now I would go with Debian. Newish release. Everything is up to date, and they are quite stable.

5

I moved to endeavours from Ubuntu and absolutely loving it. The arch back-end and simple management options are easy to use of you aren't afraid of the shell

4
SALTreply
lemmy.my.id

Fedora

I love Podman and Fedora, but for some reason I can't use podman UI :/ I'm not fond of it, but I love the cli :')

1
kanzalibraryreply
lemmy.world

I canโ€™t use podman UI :/ Iโ€™m not fond of it

Yeah, it takes time I think since Podman UI is newcomer here. But the future seems promising, especially when Docker decision outraging many their users before. And of course as a Linux user, cli is the best option here for a moment..

2
SALTreply
lemmy.my.id

I like podman because rootless capability. Red Hat teams already working hard to convince docker to accept their PR on the rootless, yet docker decline, and close the PR.

In the end, podman spin up, and it's very very powerful, for local development, yet light...

2
kanzalibraryreply
lemmy.world

rootless capability

That's Podman primary feature right? still.. privacy and security has a downside on convenience as far as many people critize, and I choose that features rather than easy implementing with no security system enhanced. Yet, the future still bluring on Redhat side when they more expand than competition. Do we will face same tragedy like Ubuntu / Docker aggresive decision in open source space again?

2
SALTreply
lemmy.my.id

I don't think so, as the team that works in podman are veteran in Industry since Red Hat inception, I don't think they will do something stupid, unless that the management meddle too much...

Red Hat need more profit to grow... and they are protecting their interest with GPL rights that people never think off.. soo... I won't touch more than podman topic, he he he..

2

as the team that works in podman are veteran in Industry since Red Hat inception

Never know about this, Thank you so much.

sooโ€ฆ I wonโ€™t touch more than podman topic, he he heโ€ฆ

Ha ha ha.. ok, I understand..

1

Classic distro hop thread. Every distro is suggested. :)

I've been using Kubuntu on my gaming PC for a couple years, and Fedora on my laptop. They both work.

4
667reply
kbin.social

If you know, you know.

Iโ€™m 0 for 1.

2
kbin.social

I recently learned about TempleOS and it seems pretty fascinating. Maybe give it a whirl.

3
kbin.social

That's the kind of thing you install in virtual box and play around for an afternoon, not something to be installed in bare metal

2

I'm running Debian 12 on an Intel i5-2500K (integrated graphics) with 16GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD and it runs smooth and rock solid.

3

I started out with Mint but then tried out Ubuntu and now I'm using EndeavourOS on my laptop. So far EndeavourOS has been the best experience for me.

2
Xe8n
lemmy.ml

Arch Linux if you well speak with terminal, Artix if not, Gentoo if want some hard:) PopOS cool.

2

If you want to go for traditional distributions that don't have native rollback mechanisms, I would suggest using btrfs along with something like snapper.

1

The top 10 in Distrowatch. I don't even know which they are, but odds are that you'll find something good in it.

1

I somewhat recently ran across VanillaOS, which I have only really had time to install and play around with for a few minutes, but it seems really cool. A very brief overview is that it is a sort-of-but-not-really immutable OS that leans very heavily on containerization to allow you to install packages from any other distro in a seamless-to-the-user way. So you can install an application (cli or GUI) from an ubuntu repo and use it along side an application from an arch repo. It's ubuntu-based, but according to the info on that link, the next release switches to being debian-based.

I mostly use ChromeOS these days-- well, I guess technically I mostly use SteamOS these days-- so I don't have a lot of hands-on experience with VanillaOS, but I found the concept really cool and from a few minutes of playing around with it, it seemed to work pretty well with respect to the containerization stuff.

1

I think the best way to decide is to fire up a bunch of VMs and install a distro on each. Going through the installation process for arch is a great way to start learning more about the OS IMO so if you're interested in that then that's a very beneficial thing to do anyway. I use Debian on my laptop and dual boot arch and Debian on my desktop. I've only ever used fedora for servers so I can't comment on how it serves as a daily driver. Here's a few distros I've used and recommend to try out. Debian Arch Manjaro ParrotOS(if you're into security) Centos

1
kbin.social

If you like Linux Mint, you might wanna try Feren, but it a bit bloated tho

1

ReVanced is a popular open-source project that enhances YouTube's functionality by allowing users to install modifications like ad-blocking, background playback, and other features not available in the official app. Itโ€™s built on top of YouTube Vanced, offering greater customization and an improved user experience. ReVanced is community-driven, with frequent updates to fix bugs and add new features, making it a great alternative for users seeking more control over their app.

1
Dotdevreply
programming.dev

Bruh is an informal term for a male friend, often used as a form of address

1

It sounds like it's part of loser culture, people that are so dysfunctional they show themself to be losers and don't have the stength of character properly conduct themself so they act both presumptuous and pretentiously trying to act cool but proving what a disappointment they are.

You bes come correct or protect ya neck.

0
necrxfagivsreply
lemmy.world

Why not using Fedora and customizing it yourself? What's the advantage of Nobara over Fedora?

0
ar0177417reply
lemmy.world

Linux from scratch and customizing it yourself? Whatโ€™s the

Nobara uses optimized custom kernel for games

2
tricororeply
lemmy.ml

Why not use Linux from scratch and customizing it yourself? What's the advantage of a distro over Linux from scratch?

0
necrxfagivsreply
lemmy.world

The only reason stated above my comment is that Nobara looks better than Fedora. I asked because I genuinely don't know what's in Nobara that is not in Fedora and why is better Nobara.

No need to be an ass, leave that for Reddit users.

2
tricororeply
lemmy.ml

I wasn't being an ass, I just jokingly pointed how a bit limited sighted your comment was: the way I see, a distro exists to save your time by already doing a pre-customization of the system for the user, even if it's just comestic.

1

NixOS, makes it easy to have the same setup because it's all in one config file. I didn't check it out until last year when they released a graphical installer, now installing/using NixOS is a breeze.

Even if I didn't install NixOS, I'd use the Nix package manager (which is separate, but part of a NixOS system) since it has more packages than the AUR. It's easy to contribute to, so I've been maintaining a package.

-2