Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sh.itjust.works

71 replies

If it curves too much you may have a disorder that can be treated with medicine.

19

Read "Posy is shit" at first. Anyways yeah he's awesome!

6

If that the same one about vacuum fluorescent displays? That's such a cool video to watch on any OLED display you have.

Also, found out from that video that my 10 year old Whirlpool oven uses a VFD.

4

I thought the narrator sounded familiar. Their videos on displays of different kinds are utterly mesmerizing. What an unreasonably high quality channel.

9

Yo, I came here to post this, I'm using his cursors right now (with the optional middle-finger addon)

5

I think my favorite part of that is the pair of tiny hands passing that double deuce right back.

19
lemmy.world

I don't really like the breeze cursor, it's just the oxygen one but flattened and it doesn't look as nice.

3
lemmy.world

I'm so confused by the one person replying to you with 5 slight variations of the same comment....

6

I have to say the "everything flat" was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best.

4
Pantherinareply
feddit.de

I have to say the "everything flat" was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best. Not sure what that is, at least from screenshots KDE looked worse than Windows XP/7

2

macOS Catalina is probably my favourite OS design, as a Linux user. No unnecessary padding like Big Sur and onwards, not overly flat like many older versions, everything clickable looks clickable, it's great.

2

I have to say the "everything flat" was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best.

1

I have to say the "everything flat" was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best.

0

I have to say the "everything flat" was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best. Not sure what that is, at least from screenshots KDE looked worse than Windows XP/7. Now Windows 11 looks better than KDE, time for some new icons!

0
lemmy.world

It's a design choice! Engelbert & English probably thought real hard about this little "offset". To bring in more dynamic or something!

26

I like it because it points up, not straight.

Everyone loves a good upcurve.

11
Alkreply
lemmy.world

I might try that. Did it take much getting used to? What do you like about it more? Is it hard to "aim" sometimes?

7

I've had literally no problem with aiming in fact aiming is easier. It took no getting used to whatsoever. I changed it because I was doing a video demonstrating a feature on a touch screen but using a mouse and it seemed closest to the touch tracking while doing a screen recording on a phone. I found I liked it and had no desire to go back.

I like the symmetry quite a bit as well as how easy it is to identify things I can interact with (black dot inside) vs things that I cannot (black border). I also really dig the thick text cursor. My only complaint is the resize handle is not super obvious. It's kind of a lemon shape.

8
lemm.ee

I'm about an hour into giving this circular cursor thing a try, and I think I'm a convert. You think it'd be hard to click on things given the overlap, but the color swap when you're over an interactable really sells it. Thanks!

4

years ago i read that the reason for the lopsidedness of the cursor was because of the old crt monitors. it just looked better having two edges being 'straight'; one exactly vertical up and down, one exactly horizontal, left to right; as those edges would have no 'jaggies'

rotating the pointer straight-up makes it look even more off-kilter.
https://files.catbox.moe/1dhu8r.png

19

Squeezing a square about 1% helps it look more like a square; to appear the same height as a square, a circle must be measurably taller. The two strokes in an X aren't the same thickness, nor are their parallel edges actually parallel; the vertical stems of a lowercase alphabet are thinner than those of its capitals; the ascender on a d isn't the same length as the descender on a p, and so on.

15
Zozanoreply
lemy.lol

It's only gay if you receive the click, not send it.

5

Depends if you've plugged two mice in at the same time, or if they are taking turns.

2
cobwomsreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

i believe it's just pointing out the misalignment of the graphic. people may be under the impression that something like a cursor has mathematically precise proportions, but it does not.

22

yeah it has kind of an optical balance to it. i don't mind that it's not mathematically perfect because it appears proportional. optics are all that matters, especially in pixel art.

(edit: i guess 'pixel art' isn't correct anymore because it's a vector graphic, but it used to be pixels!)

7
tylerreply
programming.dev

That doesn’t explain why the tail doesn’t aim at the point, it just explains why the cursor is tilted to the side.

3

Nor does it explain the irregular angles - it mentions a 45° cursor, but if it was 45° the tip would be aligned with the tail.

2