Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Is there anything actually useful or novel about "AI"?

So I'm a reasearcher in this field and you're not wrong, there is a load of hype. So the area that's been getting the most attention lately is specifically generative machine learning techniques. The techniques are not exactly new (some date back to the 80s/90s) and they aren't actually that good at learning. By that I mean they need a lot of data and computation time to get good results. Two things that have gotten easier to access recently. However, it isn't always a requirement to have such a complex system. Even Eliza, a chatbot was made back in 1966 has suprising similar to the responses of some therapy chatbots today without using any machine learning. You should try it and see for yourself, I've seen people fooled by it and the code is really simple. Also people think things like Kalman filters are "smart" but it's just straightforward math so I guess the conclusion is people have biased opinions.

Comment on

Canadian owned alternatives to Amazon?

I'm surprised no one has said london drugs https://www.londondrugs.com/about-london-drugs/about-us.html that is the closest to amazon imo. shoppersdrugmart.ca and fortinos.ca are owned by Loblaws and have an expanded marketplace selection.

Costco.ca is an american company but publicly traded. Well.ca used to be canadian but is now owned by McKesson Corporation which is American and publicly traded.

You could try to buy through etsy or look for canadian shopify stores like bee kinds https://beekindwraps.ca/ ( here is a complete list ) which are more specific sites. You can often find the same products on marketplace sites but the merchant will pay less fees if you go through their own site so try searching products too

Comment on

What have you found to be an effective way to tell if you're chatting with a bot or a real person?

Reply in thread

The problem isn't the memory capacity, even thought the LLM can store the information, it's about prioritization/weighting. For example, if I tell chatgpt not to include a word (for example apple) in it's responses then ask it some questions then ask it a question about what are popular fruit-based pies then it will tend to pick the "better" answer of including apple pie rather than the rule I gave it a while ago about not using the word apple. We do want decaying weights on memory because most of the time old information isn't as relevant but it's one of those things that needs optimization. Imo I think we're going to get to the point where the optimal parameters for maximizing "usefullness" to the average user is different enough from what's needed to pass someone intentionally testing the AI. Mostly bc we know from other AI (like Siri) that people don't actually need that much context saved to find them helpful