This one can come across as an promo for Sheehan’s New Paradigm Institute but he drops some stuff that will raise eyebrows…even among people familiar with the topic. Among them: He suggests there is a film of an interview with a NHI being that could come out once we are much further into Disclosure. He also gets into the NPI’s plans to pressure Congress to strengthen the disclosure act that was recently watered down, including political campaigns to pressure holdouts.

You can skip the first quarter if you’re already familiar with Sheehan’s background.

John Michael Godier has a preview of this week’s Event Horizon which looks at the mystery of anomalous stars in astronomical pictures from the 1950s, before Sputnik. In fact one of these images occurred the same day of the 1952 Washington DC UFO event.

A good synopsis about the internal struggle with the government. Kelleher also discusses the mounting evidence the the phenomenon intentionally uses deception to confound researchers. There’s also a discussion around the phenomenon’s ability to alter human perception and how biological evidence like DNA may not be very helpful.

Speaking together on the Senate floor, the two co-sponsors of the disclosure act celebrated their partial victory and reiterated their determination to see the Presidential Review Board established eventually.

A one hour special on Aussie TV.

Of note in this report is the suggestion that someone has spoken with the two Republicans opposing disclosure. And it’s hinted that they were warned that failure to support controlled disclosure would result in ‘catastrophic’ disclosure…which I take to mean, runaway disclosure.

My mind turns to something mentioned here a few months ago from Ross Coulthart: that a certain too-large-to-move crashed object, residing in a place outside US control might get revealed if progress is not made.

This was on the front page. Hopefully the beginning of a trend at WaPo.