Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Trump ends tariffs on some Canadian products, aiming to help Senator Collins

Reply in thread

No, that would do the opposite. Import tariffs are paid by the buyer and export tariffs are paid by the seller. It would still raise the price for the end customer, but at Canadians’ expense instead of at Americans’ expense.

Think beyond step one.

I'm highly confident the Canadian sellers would feel no need to do the US buyer any favors, by shouldering the export tariffs. In response to the creation of export tariffs, Canadian sellers would raise their prices the account for the new costs, those costs would be passed onto US buyers. Because the net price of the item the US buyer is paying doesn't change, the US buyers wouldn't even bat an eye and simply pay it like they always do.

While a business owner might have a mild interest in the geopolticial reason for an expense, to the business, the reason is immaterial. The result is what matters; how much the invoice is to get X input the business requires. If they have previously been paying $5 extra per unit to the US Government for import tariffs, and that disppears but the price of the item from Canada goes up $5 (because the Canadian seller raised the price to cover the new export tariffs the seller is paying), the end resulting price to being the exact same and it is simply business as usual to the US buyer. In this case here, if the US buyer's price doesn't even change, I'm not even sure they'd notice.

Comment on

Trump ends tariffs on some Canadian products, aiming to help Senator Collins

Trump's order exempted ​plywood sheets, some paper products, certain machinery and refrigeration equipment, and packing crates and boxes, as well as fresh and dried seaweed, the White House said.

Ottawa should play an Uno Reverse card and put export tariffs on all of these goods equal to exactly what trump just removed keeping the price of these goods exactly the same to Maine voters. Canada can use the tariff revenue to subsidize other Canadian goods trump has put import tariffs on to help out those Canadian industries.

Dominic LeBlanc, Canada's minister responsible for trade with the US, said Ottawa was ​assessing Trump's latest tariff change. "Canada stands ready to ​work constructively and in good faith towards ⁠a more mutually beneficial trading relationship that respects Canada's interests," LeBlanc said in a statement

I hope this means export tariffs from Canada.

news

Comment on

Feds Arrest Top Democratic Leader in Redistricting Fight

Reply in thread

I voted for a guy in 2020 who said he was gonna deschedule marijuana

Citation needed.

He promised to reschedule not deschedule. Source: Federal Marijuana Rescheduling: Process and Impact

"In October 2022, President Joe Biden asked the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to review how marijuana is scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)."

Biden lowered marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug. Lowering the classification is rescheduling.

At the same time in Oct 2022 he did a mass federal pardon for past federal cannabis possession convictions.

Comment on

Meta ordered to pay $25 billion penalty in New Mexico Cambridge Analytica case

Although the jury concluded that Meta had over 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act, with each transgression carrying a civil penalty as high as $5,000, a New Mexico judge was responsible for determining the ultimate fine. The Wednesday filing showed that the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

So the $25 billion judgment is a judicial reduction from the jury award of $219.5 billion.

I also like this decision from the judge:

The judge added that interest on the penalty shall accrue at the rate of 15% each year until the fine is paid off in full.

Meta will likely appeal, but not only does that not guarantee a reduction in the judgment, if they drag this out for years, New Mexico gets paid out even more.

Comment on

D'oh!

This is a very obscure way to learn this news, but thank you! I found an article this post is about here.

There are a few stores I frequent that historically don't issue gift cards with any kind of favorable conditions. Visiting Disney Springs with Disney Gift cards purchased from my local grocery store (on AMEX Blue Cash Preferred) has always been a hack to work around that by making the purchases at the Disney Springs store where they were (in the past) forced to accept Disney gift cards for purchases. This would enable 15% to 20% discounts on everything in the stores irrespective of any sales limits and would also received that discount on top of any in store discounts!

It was nice while it lasted.

Comment on

D'oh!

Reply in thread

How does it enable large discounts?

@[email protected] guessed it. Grocery stores frequently sell Disney gift cards. Grocery store loyalty programs give a multiplier of points for gift card purchases with redemption in dollars-of-future-groceries-for-free or gallons-of-gasoline-for-free. This is worth usually about 10% of the cost of the gift card. Meaning, buy a $100 gift card, and get $10 in groceries/gasoline for free. Additionally some credit cards give large bonuses for grocery store purchases. The American Express Blue Cash Preferred is the best one I know which gives 6% cash back on grocery purchases. So on a $100 Disney gift card purchase, that's $6. That's where you get your minimum of 16% discount. Sometimes the grocery store points programs have promotional periods where even more points are earned for specific vendor's gift cards (or category of gift cards). This can increase the free groceries or gasoline up to occasionally 19% back. Stack that with AMEX, and you're spending $100 for a Disney gift card but only paying $75 for it.

They’re doing this because people found a way to pay them less as long as it’s through a gift card?

I doubt thats the reason, but it is a consequence to myself and others that use this method.

In the past all merchants in Disney Springs were required to accept Disney Magic Band payments for any item sold in Disney Springs (which if you don't know is just a large outdoor shopping mall of regular mall clothing, novelty, athletic wear etc stores). The infrastructure needed to take a Disney Magic Band at the Point of Sale in a store was a specific terminal with a Disney specific RFID reader. That same terminal has a magstripe reader which accepts regular old Disney gift cards.

What I'm guessing businesses hate, is having to deal with the magic band terminal. Most stores I saw only have one of them, they are a bit temperamental, and very very few people use it which means its only available at one cash register, and staff training on it is very thin because it is so rarely used. In short, its a lot of overhead to manage and maintain burning up expensive human labor for something that doesn't drive a profit. So with the coming expiry of the contracts requiring Disney Springs merchants to provide the service, a handful of semi-powerful merchants said "we don't want this anymore" and Disney agreed with them.

I'll be sad that I may not be able to get Zara, Superdry or Uniqlo at deep discounts anymore though.

Comment on

Meta ordered to pay $25 billion penalty in New Mexico Cambridge Analytica case

Reply in thread

Even that would be clickbait though, because $219.5 billion isn't the "original fine", its the jury guidance. Its part of the sausage making of the justice system. The jury has a range of the fine per incident they can choose from to suggest a judgment. The judge then uses that jury guidance with additional info to determine the actual judgement. In this case $25 billion is the "original fine".

toronto

Comment on

Traffic Engineering In a Nutshell

I like this art piece, and while I get the joke on the commentary of modern transportation, it was helpful for me in another way.

This is a history lesson in the continued reduction of the cost of energy over time. As energy got cheaper, people optimized for personal faster transportation. Without cheap energy that would have been cost prohibitive.

news

Comment on

Feds Arrest Top Democratic Leader in Redistricting Fight

Reply in thread

So, 2022 is actually after 2020, when

Nobody should be in jail for smoking marijuana," Biden told voters at a Tuesday house party in Nashua, New Hampshire.

Asked by CNN if the former vice president supports legalizing marijuana, Andrew Bates, a Biden campaign spokesman, said Biden believes the drug should be decriminalized

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/16/politics/joe-biden-marijuana-decriminalization/ (arc)>

I'd encourage you to read more than a soundbite especially if you're looking for specifics. Here's an actual interview transcript with Biden from May 2020, interviewed by Charlamagne tha God no less, where he asks the specific question of Biden and receives the specific answer:

Charlamagne tha God: (15:42) Vice President Biden, I've read some of your black agenda and you say that you would decriminalize marijuana. What's the difference between legalizing it and decriminalizing?

Joe Biden: (15:51) Because they're trying to find out whether or not there is any impact on the use of marijuana, not in leading you to other drugs, but what it affects. Does it affect long term development of the brain and we should wait until the studies are done. I think science matters.

source

Biden does make the distinction that he's not going for full legalization, and further, that he's going to defer to science instead of making the call himself.

Biden lowered marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug.

Which isn’t what he promised to do while campaigning, and the difference between descheduling and rescheduling enabled this arrest and prosecution, which is exactly how Biden wanted it because he is and always has been racist fucking scum who has fought to preserve law enforcement’s ability to harass black people

He didn't promise it deschedule it.

he did a mass federal pardon for past federal

Uh huh

As far as bold acts of mass clemency go, it won’t lead to many people getting out of prison. In fact, it will lead to none. According to the White House and a report this week from the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) there is no one currently in federal custody for simple possession of marijuana.

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2022/10/15/don-t-expect-mass-prison-releases-from-biden-s-marijuana-clemency (arc)

Weasel words in your sentence. "In fact, it will lead to none." A pardon is far more than letting someone out of jail. Its removing the stain of the conviction from a persons record enabling them to seek employment without having to report it, pass background checks for jobs that require it, and makes you eligible for subsidized housing with that conviction removed.

"In addition to individual pardons, Biden granted clemency to 6,500 individuals convicted of simple marijuana possession under federal law, part of his broader initiative to address racial and systemic inequities in drug enforcement"

source

6500 people received the benefit of that pardon because the pardon went back all the way to 1992 convictions. Your own linked-through source says the number of pardoned people is 6577 Why didn't you mention that and instead just quote your "no one" sentence?

Are you going to counter that 6577 people is almost no one? I don't necessarily disagree, but that's because most simple possession charges are state or local offenses where the President of the United States has no pardon power. Again, your own source says this. If that's your beef, take it up with states and cities.

Joe Biden is and always was a fucking asshole

All politicians are assholes, but Biden's actions helping Americans' interactions with marijuana in the legal system are more progressive and a larger improvement in our society than any other President in over 60 years. You can complain that he didn't do enough, but I think its disingenuous for you to portray the positive actions forward and nothing.