I reckon this is what you should expect if you think about it. Human review loops sometimes only stabilise because of peer pressure and basically because everyone involved gets bored. Without those factors it's quite easy to imagine the process going on forever.

E

Goodbye

Feels like "beating human records" is pretty meaningless for things that are... not human. I was intrigued to see what the entry criteria were since these are meant to be humanoid, but couldn't find any real information on it.

O

To be fair the motive could also be non-political like some kind of personal vendetta

Very cool to see there are anti-advertising groups doing this kind of work, it's the first I've heard of them. This one is primarily against billboards but their website mentions a few similar partners. https://adfreecities.org.uk/

Vibe coding is dumb and this is funny but I also feel like it's quite misleading. Plenty of software was messy and full of technical debt long before vibe coding was a thing. And organisations trying to plan software projects in the same rigid way as physical construction has historically been responsible for many of those problems.

Genius

More likely a mathematician would correct you instead of crying. Pi is not infinite, its decimal expansion is infinite!

Off topic but I think the lyric is bathroom floor, bathroom door could turn it into a slightly different story

After reading I realised that this proposal isn't a single new element for all neutron stars, but a separate new entry on the table for every individual neutron star in existence, unless there are two that happen to have the exact same number of protons which is unlikely. Sounds good to me

All maths papers are like this

I would also like feathers on my pet dromaeosaurid please

A mixture of mercury and bromine makes for a funny kind of water

Who else is thinking of that one scene near the start of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country?

Doesn't have the "updates" part, but there is ![email protected]

we have assumed that Rex is comprised of a uniform nucleon fluid, with protons, neutrons and electrons in an idealised 1:8:1 ratio

This is how the author is estimating it, they are assuming 1/9th of the mass is protons. No idea how good that assumption is though, there is a source which doesn't look the most convincing

Y

At the risk of explaining what everyone here already gets: I like how the bottom picture could literally be a diagram of a 4-way deadlock where the buses are threads of execution and the roundabout exits are object locks.

Whereas in top picture there are no passengers and I'm fairly sure the buses aren't moving. Which probably says something about the state of the documentation