Spyke

Production costs!

The expanse did this well because they used acceleration not artificial gravity.

138
Sephtisreply
lemmy.world

Expanse did it amazingly imo, it also adds some realism into a otherwise very fictional story, which makes it somewhat easier to vibe with it.

78

"Captain, we were hit by a Class IV Photon torpedo in the aft. The production budget exploded!"

46
lemmy.world

That was such a nice touch and just cost some red leds. I'm the books they spend a lot of time on the float (to expensive to burn all the time). The way the TV show got around it all was great

20

Don't forget the sound, that clunk with every step is what sold it as real.

15
lemmy.world

Just flip around halfway and start slowing down! Free acceleration / deceleration gravity.

15

Well, not free. Acceleration usually requires a bunch of energy.

I guess if you have to do it anyway then it's a really convenient side-effect.

4

They also made amazing computerized wire rigs for the actors they used in conjunction with motion-controlled cameras. The production of the show was super impressive.

Also - everyone should read the books. They're fantastic.

Ty Frank, one of the authors and the Amos actor Wes Chatham had a really fun podcast ("Ty and That Guy") that did lots of fun deep dives on genre stuff.

3
lemmy.world

Which is fucking cool because it's one of the few space travel things that really does work. Like if we can figure out the fuel/propulsion thing and some kind of equivalent to deflector shields (not for space battles but for all the random shit in space that could destory your ship in a collision, especially if we get up to relativistic speeds), we could have space travel where you can walk around normally on the ship.

Also the gravity increasing ships like Goku used in DBZ, so we could actually have someone doing extreme gravity training while en route to a big fight.

And it works for both acceleration and deceleration, only difference is you're either travelling up or down.

Also loved the special seats they used when doing combat maneuvers. ST didn't just make up artificial gravity (since their ships moved forwards rather than up), they had inertial dampeners, because the evasive maneuvers would have been much more dangerous than the shocks from getting hit.

ST is more rooted in science than SW, but parts of it are just as much fantasy as the force, which was depressing to realize when you're hoping for humanity to eventually go in that direction. The biggest human tech fantasy in the Expanse is an engine upgrade that gives improved thrust and efficiency. Not to light speed, but just by like an order of magnitude. And they've even got a brutally realistic scene about the discovery that was great world building imo.

25

the expanse is the only universe where Epstein actually killed himself

11

I mean, gravity is just acceleration anyway.

Weird fucking acceleration due to the curvature of spacetime and how shit moves through time. But still, just acceleration.

9
absGeekNZreply
lemmy.nz

To be fair; if you could build a fusion torch and fully direct the flow; aneutronic fusion fits the bill; the thrust numbers they are using are not crazy.

You would use stupid amount of fuel to get that much delta-v; but with advanced reactors using readily available fuel sources....maybe not an issue.

6

Indeed.

Total energy available is higher, but that reaction produces radiation as the primary product. Radiation is difficulty to properly direct.

Fusion (aneutronic) produces the bulk of the energy as charged particles, which we can direct with magnetic or electric fields.

1

Yeah, it's not even that much of a stretch, like that future could be within humanity's reach. Not sure we'd actually want that particular future, but there's just something about realistic sci fi that makes this reality feel cooler.

1
Clasmreply
lemmy.world

Up until the space magic bullshit, anyway.

11
reptarreply
lemmy.world

Well the show didn't finish the story.

E: though, it didn't get less "magical", just more explained in a soft-scifi sense.

6
ns1
feddit.uk

Who else is thinking of that one scene near the start of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country?

37
lemmy.world

Or Star Trek: First Contact, when Picard, Worf, and redshirt Neil McDonough test out their zero G combat training, further cementing the fact that Star Trek only remembers that space has no gravity when it's relevant to the plot.

35
Zephorahreply
discuss.online

They do throw things out the airlock an awful lot. Though, somehow, Borg don’t have the strength to stop it but Beverly Crusher does.

5
SippyCupreply
lemmy.world

My wife abused star trek of being a soap opera at some point. At first I thought, maybe she's just showing up at the worst possible time?

No. It's all of the time. Every episode has some weird soapy bullshit. Beverly fucking a ghost, LaForge fucking a hologram, Riker fucking anything with genitals INCLUDING a hologram. Everybody be fuckin. That's not even the soapiest thing. Voyager is basically Soaps in space.

I love classic trek, but guys I think it's a soap opera.

8

guys I think it's a soap opera

It always was, but it was our soap opera with spaceships and laser guns.

4

That was my first thought and I am having trouble thinking of additional examples.

3

I assume that the Federation has better space OSHA regulations that mandate more reliable artificial gravity than the Klingons.

2

Admit it, you wanted to ask which movies and shows have done it. Instead of asking for people to tell you what the correct answer is, it’s far more effective to post the wrong answer, and wait for the flood of answers to arrive.

32
lemmy.zip

LOL. Got me. 😅

But there’s more than that to it. I think there’s some strange default setting in the human mind that makes us want to correct mistakes. Maybe it’s all about setting the record straight, being correct or whatever.

3

Wait how is that murphy's law

Edit: AHA - you couldn't remember what it actually is and wanted a nerd to give you the right answer!

I am very very mildly smart!

3

Precisely! A butterfly flaps its wings in Tokyo, and two weeks later in Denver, a black cat walks under a ladder while Myrphy is working on some cables.

2
lemmy.world

"Gravity plating!" As long as there is floor, you're good.

25
sh.itjust.works

I’m glad somebody else caught this, it always irritated me in Enterprise when they insisted that it was a gravity generator and not just plating.

3

i think its plating for trek, thats why you can turn it off in some areas and not others. cant say the same for other shows, they likely use a similar mechanism.

1

This is covered in the Attack Pattern Trunks web comic. If I remember correctly it works even when all power is disabled due to thermal power or some such, I'd have to go searching through all the episodes to cover it.

2
lemmy.world

Gravity is a very dense liquid. Generator makes it in big batches at a time and it just stays there for long even after the generator is gone. After the battle is done and everything is repaired, they just top up the pool and all is good.

20
lemmy.world

On a space station more than a space battle, but Titan AE had a scene that made good use of this. The station is old, and early in the scene the gravity generator goes on the fritz, causing everyone to float until some percussive maintenance gets it working again. When bad guys show up Matt Damon shoots the generator to cause some confusion and let him escape faster by pushing off toward the exit.

13

In Star Trek IV, The Undiscovered Country, exactly that happened. It is kind of a unique scene, because it had to be a bitch to film.

12
lemmy.dbzer0.com

The Undiscovered Country is VI. Star Trek IV is The Voyage Home. Both are great, anyways.

12
ripcordreply
lemmy.world

One is a great Star Trek movie. The other is a beloved comedy starring Star Trek people.

4
lemmy.world

Gravity is on a separate subsystem & power supply, because without gravity people couldn’t reasonably move and fix the rest of the ship, so even when compared to general life support, it’s the most critical function and the most isolated.

And production cost.

12

In David Weber's Honorverse, artificial gravity is based on the drive system, and was routinely considered both in ship design and battle outcomes.

1

Doylist explanation: it would be too expensive for the FX department.

As it happens, the same worldbuilding project I mentioned in another post here sort of addresses this. The same aliens mentioned there don’t use artificial gravity at all. Being arboreal creatures they’re well suited to microgravity and can happily live permanently in zero G. Upon meeting humans and learning that we want artificial gravity (specifically centrifugal gravity), they wonder why we spent all the effort to get away from gravity only to spend even more effort to bring it back.

Since human orbital colonies take the form of O’Neil cylinders, you can cut off the gravity by halting the cylinder’s rotation. If stopped abruptly enough this would cause a lot of damage initially as objects go flying. It would also put the terrestrial, bipedal humans at a disadvantage compared to the aliens with five prehensile extremities.

11

Yep! One of the more rememberable parts... Floating pink Klingon blood droplets everywhere!

6

I am a big fan of sci-fi and understand how expensive weightlessness is to film, so combine that with the amount of shows that have been canceled and I completely accept the fact that they try to keep this more fictional than science.

11

Star Trek VI - The Undiscovered Country did it, even making it a point during the Trial ;-)

7
raldone01reply
lemmy.world

I like the movie and atmosphere but damn the villains are whack

I wish there were some spinoff or something similar.

1

There are a few tie in novels iirc. I read one a long time ago that took place during the time skip after earth blows up.

1

If it were expected to be more than a 1 in 1000 risk, they would probably have handles on the walls and ceilings to help move about during an emergency.

7
lemmy.zip

That's why I prefer hard SciFi like The Expanse books, where science is a main driver to life and motivations to drive the story.

5
Art3misreply
lemmy.world

Ive sen some of the show ad liked it a lot. Are the books even better??

2
lemmy.world

Yes, and continue on about 30 years after the show, giving an actual conclusion to the story.

4
lemmy.world

They did in the first episode of Transformers Animated. Granted, that was a cartoon, which made it infinitely easier to have them float in zero gravity than a live action movie.

5
ripcordreply
lemmy.world

That's the episode where for some reason the Deception jets turn into triangles and after sleeping for 6 million years Optimus wakes and just says "thanks" and throws Teletran-1 a thumbs up and also Casey Kasem is there right

2
TarnFanreply
lemmy.world

The triangles are supposed to be their cybertronian forms before they disguised themselves as earth vehicles.

1
ripcordreply
lemmy.world

But in their robot forms they still looked like jets

1

Even when the life support systems have completely lost power, everyone is dying, etc. Gravity is the one system too critical to reroute.

4

starships have redundancies most likely, much like the life support systems. its like artificial gravity isnt coming from an actual generator, but the whole ship itself in some unknown mechanism, most scifi genre dont explain how its being created, it looks more like an energy field throughout the whole ship generated from every "system" in the internally.

3

I find not many things are destroyed unless integral to the plot but there are times where it does because the story wanted it to. I think its more incommon with video games though as it makes a nice alternate gameplay thing to have in.

3

Not magic. The artificial gravity stabilizers are directly enhanced by the production budget stabilizers, which keep them in check.

3