Spyke

Replies

general

Comment on

Does this plan make sense? v2

You missed a very important one, fix the main reason billionaires don't pay any tax:

Using your unrealised gains (e.g. shares) as collatoral to take out loans should be considered realising those gains and thus subject to capital gains tax

Comment on

Good comeback

Reply in thread

This is lovely and wholesome, but you're not the type of person the post is about.

Edit: sorry I just realised my comment was kinda glib, so let me elaborate. You didn't specify but I assumed you approached those women with a friendly air, having a genuine desire to have a conversation with them as equals, and said something like "oh I love that album, have you listened to it?" Putting yourself in their shoes, compare that to a guy who approaches them aggressively, having a deep seated resentment for all women, and lashes out with "pretending you like that band huh? Prove it then, name 5 of their songs!"

main

Comment on

*Permanently Deleted*

Defederation is a horrible solution to that problem imo. It would mean no other user on this instance could see any of their content, just because you don't like some of it. Worse, it cuts off all the users on that instance from all content on this instance. You'll just create fragmentation and make things worse for everyone imo.

This problem only exists for you because you're browsing All. The obvious solution is to just subscribe to the communities you're interested in. There are plenty of good ways to discover communities and stay up to date on new ones without using All. All really means ALL content, that means there's going to be stuff you don't like, and that's definitely not a good reason for defederation.

Long term I'm sure that a) as Lemmy grows, All will fill up with more mainstream stuff and you won't see so much weird niche content, and b) there'll be more advanced filtering/blocking tools so that you can do All but choose which instances to include/exclude

memes

Comment on

So much for Blockchain's real life use cases

Reply in thread

A banking system running on Blockchain

Is an astronomically terrible idea. It:

  • would use as much electricity as an entire country
  • payments/transfers would be both much slower AND much more expensive than via a bank
  • would have no protection against fraud. You got scammed? Your money's gone. You paid for something online and it never arrived? Too bad
  • would have no way to stop money laundering
  • would have no way to help people who forgot their password, they'd just lose their life savings permanently
  • would tie up a bunch of capital, preventing reinvestment and growth. There would be no way to get a bank loan to buy a house for example
  • the list goes on