True, lets teach us to be detectives to question, compare, seek context on every type of music fake content.

this is a very good way, a chain, i will post it as a good practice.

sure, but i mean different class of platforms, where quantity of streams dont matter or pay, this break the concept, bots ans spammer will not care.

i think this is also used in Sonora. The 2 + years old for generic query

Yes. 2+ years old could also be safe looking for generic genre. Also, too much compressed and lacks the natural "air" and analog noise of studio recordings

Very good question. Thanks. this doesn't prove authorship on its own — authorship requires more and many layers, and we don't verify identity. What it gives you is proof of date and integrity: the hash sealed on Blockchain and eIDAS (plus the IPFS CID). It shows you had that file on an exact date, which reinforces your authorship as an extra layer and documents your connection to the work, but it doesn't constitute authorship by itself. It's the best proof in the EU since it's regulated, and it works as solid evidence globally too. What works best here is uploading a few drafts and then the final version... it makes the proof a lot stronger.

If you have any more constructive criticism, let me know here.

Great! let me know

Starting a community also, ANTI AI MUSIC : https://lemmy.world/c/AntiAIMusic

What there is, though, are many daily searches and listens — there just aren't enough registered artists.

OK, there aren't many registered indie artists yet, and they decide which searches they appear in from their artist dashboard. If it matches your search, they show up. 'No, I meant navigating within the site' — this could be done, yes.

Thank you for your comment. It's actually a search engine that uses the YouTube API; AI helps with certain tasks in the system for filtering and for obtaining more information about the artist you searched for on the same page. Filtering is done through multiple approaches simultaneously—patterns, text, track release years, etc. (though it's not 100% perfect, and we're gradually refining it).

I don’t know how you listened to the music, but on desktop (it’s designed more for desktop), there are no issues—you can open another tab, for example. On mobile, due to YouTube Music's limitations, if you navigate away, the music stops playing; there's nothing to be done about that.

It's in beta, so there are still things to improve. The main idea is to promote indie artists and rank them better when users search for mainstream music or genres, removing the logic based on stream counts, followers, etc., and rewarding activity over popularity.

Finally, about "there’s no obvious way to browse artists" — I didn’t quite understand you. There is a search box. From the beginning, the idea was for users to search for what they want to listen to without being overwhelmed. I find it very tiring that current platforms show thousands of artists on the front page; there’s an oversaturation of information in that sense, and in the end, you don’t know what to click play on.

I understand this system isn’t for everyone, and that’s fine—it’s not a project aimed at making money. In any case, thank you for trying it out and for your feedback, which is always valuable.

https://lemmy.world/post/47103558

you are right. New platforms must manual validate artists.

This is great idea, will use it and promote it.

It Is really a normal search engine, looks like a chatbot.

Well , maybe is not for you or you just dont know , but is legal (eIDAS timestamps hashes) and part of the justice system in UE.

https://laprueba.digital/en/timestamp/

In LPD 3 layers of proof: eIDAS + Blockchain + IPFS (CID)

Qualified timestamps are regulated in Europe. The eIDAS Regulation (EU 910/2014) is the European legal framework that regulates digital trust services. A qualified electronic timestamp is the highest level of guarantee that exists in the European Union.

Article 42 of the eIDAS Regulation establishes that a qualified timestamp enjoys a presumption of accuracy of date/time and of data integrity. What does this mean in practice? That it's not the party presenting the proof who has to demonstrate that it's reliable, but rather it's the opposing party who must provide solid evidence to challenge it.

Blockchain: public, immutable and globally verifiable proof.
eIDAS: legal presumption in the EU, maximum guarantee before courts.

You should be informed. If you dont trust, it ok, no problem, others do. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation

You can. I will have valid digital proof based on the integrity (hash) and date on the original file. If I catch you with a similar design or aesthetic, I could sue you. It is not perfect protection, but is important. Read: https://laprueba.digital/en/how-it-works/