thanks for writing this

yeah this is what I meant by nuance, I just dislike when people have mostly-contradictory viewpoints that overlap in the sole fact that they believe 'AI=bad'. for example I've heard the same people irl both say things that show they believe 'AIs cannot do very simple tasks' and 'AI can be superpersuasive, manipulative'

I use pi, llama.app links to it. super minimal, easy to extend.

ministral3-3b at crappy quants is better than internet search (faster). terrible for agentic stuff, but low thought tasks that you want to get though fast, this is perfect

OSS gramerly would be really nice

libreoffice+llama.cpp ? (llamacpp isn't gpl, MIT)

short-term profits

if 'AIs are a poor substitute for a human at most jobs', then even this wouldnt work. disregarding long term effects, AI must be able to do jobs to a degree for this to happen

__

'create new original things' is subjective, but people push it to an extreme. it does not need to be the opposite of 'ai can produce deepfakes' to be included. example of new original thing: https://openai.com/index/model-disproves-discrete-geometry-conjecture/