If the Yes campaign are serious about the Voice to the nation being important to the Indigenous people, then no-one is standing in the way of making it happen. The vote to enshrine it in the Constitution failed, but the body can still be created and can still function primarily the same.

How much of the infrastructure is government owned? Any if it? I do not think he could do this even if he ordered it.

Isn't he both a pedophile and a pederast?

They tested 38 lakes in 23 countries. Only one lake in Australia was tested. There are millions of lakes in the world. Perhaps next time they should increase their sample size.

Voting no doesn't make you racist. Voting no means you do not support the proposed change to the Constitution.

Equal pay for equal work. Why should someone working in an office building be paid more than someone working remotely, doing the same job?

Are micro plastics in our water a problem? Yes. The title is totally misleading. It cannot be among the world's most polluted if you have only tested 38 lakes out of millions.

I would suggest looking at the .gov websites first on how the electoral process works. Then come here and ask some clarifying questions.

The representative body can be established without a change to the Constitution.

A Government that did not want it in, would simply reduced it to 1-2 people and ignore it.

God damn autocorrect. You are correct.

The representative body can be established without a change to the Constitution.

Just to point out, racism does not have to be negative treatment. Racism just has to be inequitable. The proposed amendment creates a system for Indigenous Australians, which is unavailable to other Australians. That is inequitable.

The changes needed can be achieved without a Constitutional amendment.