"Many countries do not recognise the X gender marker"

Yeah, guess which country also doesn't do that?

Why do you think direct immoral actions are worse than indirect immoral actions? I don't buy that. Hell, you are even saying that you are absolved of responsibility for animal abuse completely just because you are paying someone to do it, and not doing it personally. Most people just deny animal abuse happens at all, but you admit it is immoral, yet shift the blame on others along with the responsibility for murdering them, which they do for your pleasure.

This is like saying "x has hired hitmen to killed seven people, but my parent forces me to eat broccoli every day, so since x is commiting a indirect immoral action, my parent is the worst one of them.

I am not a moral person. I, quite frankly, do not care about animals, and I would like to think I would be able to murder an animal myself(for food), since I am doing it now, albeit indirectly, and if you can't live with the consequences of your decisions, why make them? Weigh the consequences of your actions. Do not run away from them like a coward(a lot of moralizing for a self-proclaimed immoral person).

I respect vegans. If you care about animal welfare, and are opposed to cruel treatment of animals you should not eat meat, and that's what they do.

A horse with arms is much more dangerous. No way I could take it.

Having a unified standard is simply better than allowing every hardware company to exploit their customers by making them buy their chargers, while increasing the amount of different chargers they need.

I read it as "robot that can eat orgasms for fuel. My version is better.

I quite like that expression. It seems accurate to me, since, as it was pointed out by another commenter replying to you, people do not, in fact, check the experiments themselves, ensure that proper methodology was used, etc. They simply believe what the people in authority positions are telling them, so the word believe is quite accurate - you do not actually know the reasons why certain beliefs, theories are accepted by the scientific community, you just take their word for it.

Furthermore, any scientist does the same thing to the body research that was developed before him, otherwise, every scientist would have to start over.

God, the US would collapse as a country. It runs a huge deficit, what would it be without the dollar?

Firstly, I would like to say that what happens in the animal world has no bearing on morality. You said it yourself, morality is a human thing. So a lion is not a moral agent, I would not judge it for eating a zebra, nor do I believe that we should try to prevent it from doing so. However, just because animals do something, it does not mean it is not immoral for us to do so, it is as natural for certain animals to eat humans, as it is to eat other animals. That does not mean that murder is moral now, suddenly. Similarly, it is not the case that because it is not immoral for animals to kill other animals(they are not moral agents), it is ok for us to do so.

Secondly, the words direct/indirect do not mean intentional/unintentional. I do not think it is sensible to claim that the more removed you are from the consequences of your actions, the less moral responsibility you bear, but it seems to me like you are excusing the behavour of carnists(that word is, as another commenter put it, metal as fuck) by claiming that most of them are ignorant of the consequences of their actions, but this has nothing to do with how "direct" the act is. I would like to add that the reason for the ignorance of most meaters(meat eaters) with regards to how the animals are treated is their characters, they are keeping themselves in ignorance and are resistant to attemps to enlighten them.

Where do you get one of these?

What are they called?

A rather unsightly mode of transport, but I have to admit it is economical.

I believe this might have been an instance of so-called "flirting".

If the only thing you feed an AI is words, then how would it possibly understand what these words mean if it does not have access to the things the words are referring to?

If it does not know the meaning of words, then what can it do but find patterns in the ways they are used?

This is a shitpost.

We are special, I am in any case.

Why is everyone hating on french people? I do not quite get it.

If Marxists are not leftist, I do not know who is.

That's a great system, keeps everyone happy.

You should mirror their move as white bears are stronger than black bears.

Who the hell is this guy? He looks so out of place.

I am not religious. You commented about the sociocultural roots of religion. You were wrong.

But because I was not making up bullshit about Christianity to insult it, but instead was actually, unlike you, "rational and reasonable", your binary thinking led to you writing even more fan-fiction about religion, unfortunately.

Feel free to write another essay full of nonsense.

Toblerone is american? Wtf?

"all of Europe could fit inside the 48 continental states alone" - are you sure about that, fam?

Maybe if you had a clue about what is going on outside of your country you would want to leave it, but alas, you don't.