It's just much easier to stop using them. Remember: its founder and largest shareholder (I guess) was one of the billionaire groupies standing behind Trumd during his inauguration. Canadians should not be shopping on Amazon.

US physicians: read https://canadahealthwatch.ca/2025/03/25/i-traded-my-u-s-medical-career-for-life-in-canada-heres-how-the-two-health-systems-stack-up. I think you're most welcome here :)

Lower settings. Sorry, thats all there is to it. 8GB is not a lot these days (i have two older cards in my PC and they're both 12). Textures, screen resolution, there's a bunch you can do.

Crashes are unavoidable, given that everyone wants max performance everywhere, things get shipped with all the debugging and checking stripped.

Thanks! Clojure is a great example of a modern Lisp. Common Lisp is the Swiss army knife of programming and used everywhere you care to look, that is if you look hard ;)

I ran e/OS on an old OnePlus for a year, quite close to GrapheneOS and mostly just as free of Google. There are plenty of options out there to run a degoogled Android these days.

But yes, running GrapheneOS on a brand new Pixel Pro right now, couldn't be happier.

Congrats :). You can't go wrong with Rolex, you're not "dropping money", you're "moving it around" (from your bank to your wrist), the great thing about these watches is that you can always move things around the other way again lol. I looked up the current street value of the 1980's Date I inherited from my dad and if anything, it costs more now than it did then.

I think French and Heinz use Canadian tomatoes. So does the bottle of Compliments in my fridge. I guess we grow more tomatoes than we realize :)

While I won't say that writing a text editor or rewriting (base) Emacs is easy, I think it is all about the ecosystem. There's lots of Emacs reimplementations out there, some really good ones (like Lem), but they all have the same shortcoming: "no org mode", "no magit", and so on.

Emacs has a truly enormous ecosystem and only a reimplementation that runs everything unchanged has a chance of attracting enough attention. There was a time that that was seen as a worthwhile venture: Elisp was limited and slow. However, now with CL compatibilty and native compilation, I don't see it happening. Not in the sense of something standing up that can and will actually replace Emacs.

Worse is better :-)

That should not happen, of course. I mean, I got a cheap chinese watch off AliX with such a strap and while I had my qualms, it held on. Are you sure you're fully seating both pins?

Two solutions: warranty claim, or get a regular non-quick-release setup.

It's a cult and you just joined it ;-)

There's a ton of reading on all these topics. If you're interested in browsing what the actual process of tinkering on watches and clocks entails, archive.org has scans of relevant books, like https://archive.org/details/practicalwatchre0000deca and https://archive.org/details/watchclockmaking0000wjga. If lending your eyeballs to the algorithm is more your thing, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJxnP0qA2hU&list=PL7q4FTKNfQj-bcGk0JfUXioeq6KNtyhVA is a neat playlist.

There's a bunch of videos on probably one of the most interesting devices in history, the Harrison H4 marine chronometer. Whether it was the first or the best is probably less important than that there is a juicy story about this nerd that comes out of nowhere and officials refusing to hand over the large pot of money that the British promised to whoever could make a clock precise enough to be used on a ship for navigation.

An actual modern watch making hero is George Daniels, who essentially built watches by hand from scratch - bars of gold, steel, brass entered his shop and working watches came out (at the tune of maybe one a year). A bunch of documentaries were made about his life and work and I think they're all quite cool.

Lemme know if you need more :P

In a nutshell, the study of measuring time. Most textbooks start with the stars and how we can use them for that purpose, including of course our own. Solar clocks, water clocks, you name it and it existed before the modern clock was invented.

Turns out that timekeeping was crucial for navigation so in a sense, making clocks better became a precondition of navigating the globe and a lot of advancements in (micro)mechanics started there.

Of course, these days we keep all but perfect time and position using atoms and satellites and software, but a lot of people are attracted to these marvelous mechanical devices that measure time. So learning about (mostly mechanical) watches and clocks, what makes them tick, how to maintain them and how to repair them is usually the topic of discussion for horology forums.

It's a very deep rabbit hole. But a fun one.

I started going down it because I like tinkering, doing fine motoric stuff but found spending money on Lego sets got boring and I ran out of space to display them. Watches are much more space efficient and when done with them, you can sell them :)

My next step is asking government institutions like Environment Canada to move off X and onto Mastodon.

Politely, of course.

The sort of protections that you're offered by your CPU and modern OSes aren't offered by GPUs and their libraries, yet. So you're back in the '80s, when your Mac or MS-DOS machine would crash hard on the smallest issue. That's life, I'm afraid.

It's on my (ever shrinking) list of clocks I'd like to own. And be able to maintain :-). Thanks for sharing.

My favorite watch is my smart watch. It's actually smart: it never needs a charge, it sets time from atomic time signals, has a clearly readable mixed analog/digital display, and comes with some handy extras like a compass and baro/altimeter. Oh, and I can wear it while logging, as it's virtually indestructable. Try that, Apple! (it's a Casio G-Shock Mudmaster GWG-1000).

My second favorite watch is what I'm now wearing - a CA$129 Seagull. It's a skeleton watch with no dial and transparent front and back case, so I can brag about my skills ("I disassembled and cleaned this watch, try to find any scratch marks on the screws!" - there are some tiny ones, I must admit), and, more importantly, show people how mechanical watches work :-). It's also a darn good timekeeper for the money.

Gorgeous thing. Is that mercury in the glass tubes in the pendulum?

Yes you do! ;-)

Is that 285 under the Omega sign on the movement? Calibre 285 from 1952 according to the serial number. That's gonna be a heck of a restoration job :)

I have a decent Geiger counter these days (well, technically a dosimeter) for that. But in case of doubt, my recommendation is to submerge the dial in IPA, use Q-tips to wipe off the lume, flush IPA and double-wrap Q-tips before they dry then in the trash. It's quick and safe that way and you probably want to relume anyway.

My absolutely not-fake Rolex has an acrylic crystal and it scratches up like there's no tomorrow. Not a guarantee in general, therefore (dunno about this specific model, though)