Comment on
Better times back then
Now the virus is the operating system.
Comment on
Better times back then
Now the virus is the operating system.
Comment on
When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken
Reply in thread
Pug J right now:
Comment on
Trump Team Refuses to Explain Imported Beef Origin as Backlash Grows
Reply in thread
Nice investigative work - this is the first I've heard about the contamination. It looks like China caught the issue back in March, and its highly likely more of the supply chain was compromised. This would make it subject to further Chinese boycotts, endangering the Argentian economy and screwing Milei because it makes things bumpy for Peter Thiel in his new home.
This is why Trump is both helping Milei and refusing to say where the beef is from.
Btw, these are the side effects of chloramphenicol:
Serious and fatal blood dyscrasias (aplastic anemia, hypoplastic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia) are known to occur after the administration of chloramphenicol.
There have been reports of aplastic anemia attributed to chloramphenicol which later terminated in leukemia.
Blood dyscrasias have occurred after both short-term and prolonged therapy with this drug.
Comment on
When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken
Reply in thread
Have you ever met a pug? They're ALL like that. Try arguing philosophy with one - you'll end up with piss all over your shoes.
But I ask you this, how many pugs post historical content in meme format?
We only know of one, a most extraordinary one, one who only wanted to upvote more.
Now, because of Piefed's pedantry, Dog has abandoned us, and you're saying good riddance because he got some mud on the carpet once. Shame on you, sir. I hope you have the wisdom to never own pets.
Comment on
When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken
Reply in thread
The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works.
Comment on
When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken
Reply in thread
Looks like their Piefed instance incorporated a vote limit impacting a users ability to interact with their audience, and the holy one just threw up their hands at the thought of having to migrate due to instance dumbfuckery again.
Comment on
Nitter receives Cease & Desist from X/Twitter
Sounds like Elon's Bitter.
Comment on
When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken
Reply in thread
If he is, I hope he knows the Fediverse reached out and touched faith...
Comment on
Dolly Bill
Naw, call it a Dollyar.
Comment on
CIA Director John Ratcliffe Makes Surprise Trip to Moscow
JFC... history isn't just rhyming anymore, it's full out rapping.
Comment on
A photo taken of a man dressed up as Spider-Man fighting a white supremacist by Chris Juhn
Reply in thread
Spider Noir I believe, but I don't have sourcing for it unfortunately.
Comment on
AI = Fascism
Reply in thread
It's drastically cooler underground until you get really deep in the mantle, and most importantly, the temperature is stable. No weather fluctuations.
This is why wine caves were invented before refrigeration - consistently cool, stable temperatures.
Comment on
A photo taken of a man dressed up as Spider-Man fighting a white supremacist by Chris Juhn
This is the Avengers movie we need right now:
Comment on
AI = Fascism
I think the overall sentiment is correct given how the current manifestation of AI is built primarily to build a system of control over human information, with the principle players (Oracle, Amazon, Google) attempting to execute the strategic goal of controlling human intelligence for the purposes of political power.
I also agree that the way the supporting network for AI is being built out is an environmental catastrophe, both in terms of data centers physical ecological footprint and the additional power they consume.
But I fully believe that it's not the technology at fault - rather, its how its being used by the power players that control it.
A data center doesn't have to be an ecological nightmare, for instance. An underground facility powered by above ground wind and solar could provide both the needed power and temperature control, while containing the impacts from sound and machinery. But it's more expensive to build underground than it is to buy off the city council in bumfuck Alabamistan.
Let's look the technology itself. What AI has become is not intelligence or consciousness in any sense of the word. It has become a text based interface with an engine capable of processing large datasets and performing complex operations on the level of a human operator (sometimes).
This in itself is not fascist -but it absolutely has the power to enable fascism in the wrong hands, and all of the principal players in the space have proven themselves amoral (save perhaps Anthropic in certain cases). Conversely, I also believe it has the power to enable democracy in the right hands.
The key word here is power. Power means the power to either disrupt the status quo or build it. AI is a power we've only come to live with for about two years now, and its terrifying because its already in the hands of the wrong people.
But it's not going away, no more than nukes will or guns or anything humanity has found a use for. I think blanket statements like AI = fascism do more harm than good because they give responsibility to a tool, when in fact it should lie with the people who use those tools towards nefarious ends.
In conclusion, I'd like to end with this loving message to any Anonymous who haven't sold out to the feds:
Comment on
You get a Pope! And you get a Pope!
Reply in thread
Comment on
Clarence Clemons kissing Bruce Springsteen, 1980(?)
Sounds like they rode through that Tunnel of Love...
Comment on
Reddit alternative Oddsrabbit added a gallery view for visual communities
Reply in thread
When your political affiliation and ideology become the center of your opinion rather than trying to come close to truth
So that's your line of censorship, and it's subjective. "Trying to come close to the truth" is a subjective analysis of the content the user posts. If a user posts that Taiwan is Chinese, do you censor them? What if a user posts that Taiwan is not Chinese? Both are subjective truths depending on one's political stance. Regardless of what you decide, unless you let them both speak, you're making an editorial decision to support one side or the other.
If you don't let them speak at all, then you're removing the conversation to avoid damaging the morale of your users (your words in the previous post, not mine). This is propaganda by omission - pretending the discussion of the topic doesn't exist, and thus presenting the illusion that the problem doesn't exist.
But I get it (have run social media sites in the past) - you're looking for a certain level of quality conversation to appear, in the hopes that it generates the quality content needed to draw enough eyes to your project to ensure long-term visibility. A couple of trolls can kill that in the early stages of growth, and politics is a breeding ground for trolls.
But its also going to draw more of an audience than most other topics, and it will generate far more discussion. Like it or not, understanding the political forces that control your life is a matter of survival these days.
There are people who don’t like politics and want a space political free
So why not allow them to independently censor their feeds instead locking down the contributions of people who do like politics? The tech exists on both Reddit and Lemmy (and works pretty well). Besides, you're already taking a political stance by funding non-profits - unless they're shelters for homeless nazis, it's likely you're providing funding to a left-leaning cause. What happens when one of your non-profits runs afoul of the Trump administration? Will you allow them to post?
But hey, it's your space, it looks slick, and its a neat idea - I wish you luck. But it's not worth my time to create an account there - there are plenty of outlets where my content won't be censored by default if it strays into politics.
Comment on
Reddit alternative Oddsrabbit added a gallery view for visual communities
Hmm... good concept for a community site, particularly the non-profit support, but the no politics rule is going to keep it from every becoming relevant and will eventually lead to censorship within the platform. For instance, will they allow posts about climate change? It's clearly a political issue, but much more of an environmental one, and something that is affecting us every day - does this mean it's a topic non-grata on Oddsrabbit?
I also don't trust the "no surveillance" pledge, regardless of the developer's intent. The legal framework that would keep that information private doesn't really exist in the US any more in a practical sense, and its disingenuous to imply they can protect it.
Source: their about page
Comment on
Reddit alternative Oddsrabbit added a gallery view for visual communities
Reply in thread
Censorship is still censorship. Where's the line when a topic becomes too political?
If you're looking to improve people's morale, then what you're running is not a discussion forum, but a propaganda machine. Once you cross the line from the presentation of ideas to the manipulation of the reaction to those ideas, you've ceased to become a voice for the people, and you've just become another voice telling them how to feel and what to think.
Comment on
Let there be peace
If you want to see some of the most amazing dogfights in your life, put up three or four, all within sight of each other about 30' - 40' apart. This attracts multiple birds, and the distance is too great for one bird to dominate the food source, but just close enough to keep them pissed off at each other.