Source on the paper?

They had this Machine that told them lies and stories they really liked.

They were so fond of it, they kept building more and more processing machines to contain the lying Machine.

While they were in awe of how good the Machine was at talking and lying, they forgot about everything else and became obsessed by it.

They sacrificed all the resources they needed to make their lives better to the lying Machine, because they wanted to use the Machine even more.

Eventually, they had no resources left for themselves, as the lying Machine consumed it all.

It is said there was many early warnings about the dangers of the Machine.

But the Machine told them to only listen to the Machine.

Source: https://infosec.exchange/@Em0nM4stodon

I get the main idea of that board, but please remember: people don't "have" neurodiversity. Also the right terminology is neurodivergent. Diversity comes mainly from statistics' lingo, every brain in the world can be considered "within" the neurodiverse word. Divergence comes from systemic exclusion and oppression. That's why our community historically went for Ndivergent in the 90's 🌻❤️‍🩹

This is SO wholesome 🌻😊 tank you for coming up with it, I really liked the message on the previous post but I'm sick of seeing AGI stuff taking over the artistic/creative side of federated autistic comunities 🥲👉👈

Lots of queerfobic comments on this post tho 🤔 I get that tradwifes and conservative ppl are a big part of permacultural / solarpunk spaces sadly