Spyke

Replies

Comment on

'Starfleet Academy' Finale Built Villain's Collapse on Strontium's Actual Emission Spectrum

Reply in thread

Honestly, I'll defend the ideas underpinning the spore drive all day. Mycelial networks are deeply weird IRL, and the idea of "what if there was one that grows through subspace" is an interesting extrapolation from that. "Physics as biology" is a pretty fresh and interesting idea for the franchise to explore (and I'm totally here for the argument that they didn't explore it enough).

canada

Comment on

Carney, Ford announce nearly $9B partnership to support steel, auto, critical mineral sectors

Also in the joint package, Ottawa is easing greenhouse gas regulations as U.S. tariffs pressure Canada's automotive sector.

Canada's emissions standards are now set to flatline until 2030 — maintaining 2026 levels for new light-duty vehicles through the 2029 model year. Annual increases are set to resume in the 2030 model year.

Ottawa initially proposed increasing emissions standards from 2026 through 2035 to reach its goal of 75 per cent EV sales by 2035.

This change comes after the Trump administration made similar changes on Monday.

canada

Comment on

The other questions from the Alberta referendum

Reply in thread

I agree - the new government in Quebec has an obvious stake in reopening the Constitution, and Ford's the kind of guy who would jump on it. They meet the 50% of the population stipulation all by themselves, and between them and Alberta, they have 3 out of the 7 provinces required. It's not implausible that they could find four more.

BUT, the current version of Ford might not be too excited to be seen climbing into bed with separatists.

Comment on

Retrospective Discussion | Doctor Who (2005) | 3x02 "The Shakespeare Code"

I was prepared to come in with a half-assed gag about how this is one of the episodes of all time...but I disliked it even more than I remembered.

It's not silly enough to be a romp, and it's not scary enough to be a horror (despite seeming like a Halloween episode, this one apparently aired in April). It doesn't really engage with the time period or Shakespeare himself in a meaningful way. It's just blandly there, for the most part.

It's not very kind to Martha. The Doctor dismisses her concerns about being a Black woman in Elizabethan London. She doesn't get to do any meaningful doctoring, which would have given her some agency in the story. They didn't even make her a theatre nerd - she seems to have about as much familiarity with Shakespeare as the average person. But hey, she got to feel sad about the Doctor being hung up on Rose. Character development.

Shakespeare himself doesn't get much, either - I actually think his initial "rock star" introduction is pretty fun, but he's little more than a series of gags after that. Much is made about his genius, and his grief over losing Hamnet, but neither comes through in the writing or performance.

Sprinkle in too many references to Rowling that have aged like milk, and we've got an episode that I have no desire to revisit again any time soon.

Comment on

James McAvoy Pitched 'Star Trek' Series About "Young Picard"

Reply in thread

I don't think I can agree with that - plenty of Lower Decks episodes seemed reverse-engineered around whatever legacy actors they were able to book, and other legacy actors were just sort of...stuffed in there.

I would agree that they always crafted meaningful stories around that stuff, but that stuff is still pretty foundational - moreso than perhaps any show besides the third season of Picard, which I would enthusiastically hold up as an example of "fan service" (I don't love the term, but whatever, it fits) done very poorly.