A24's success was always its marketing scheme: make all the movies, advertise the good ones. Once people started having expectations about the upcoming releases it was doomed.

I mean, that would be ideal. But I was talking realistic. Better pensions would be available if people stopped voting against their interests. But we don't even have that, so a revolt against billionaires doesn't seem likely to me anytime soon.

NTFS drives have an index built-in. It's not fit for search, but it comes with a journal and you can update a search index incrementally. That's what Voidtools Everything does. It's very fast and doesn't need a background index. (I assume modern Linux drive formats can do the same)

For this proof to work, you'd have to prove that you can't. And we can simulate whole worm brains and fly brains, and they behave like real in simulated worlds, so you'd have to prove that there's something different about humans. This paper doesn't offer anything like that.

• Isn't "overproduced" not an antonym of slop?
• That you won't buy it won't make its (probable?) success less of a counterargument to this ceo's ramblings.

It's a cabaret, there's many versions of this poster

Why can't ripgrep? "Everything" search does this. https://www.voidtools.com/downloads/

That would make it more expensive. That's not realistic, especially with aging populations. Retirement age should always have been life expectancy (like it was in the beginning). And should have been a fixed amount, dignified living, not to fund the life you've gotten used to. And on top of UBI, of course.

AI would be overwhelmingly embraced if this was the case. Even a basic income program would have made it palpable.

Dot-com bubble took about 5 years before it burst, and that was crazier. Why would you think this one would pop quicker?

Nah, like a 5th of the market was tied up in dot com. Hundreds of start-ups that were all supposed to take over their sector. AI is not sustainable, but it's nothing like that.

I haven't heard this much bubble talk ever. It's not the same prediction made by the same people again this time. I don't even know anybody irl who likes vibecoding (myself included) who thinks this is sustainable.

Even the ones saying it before the Dot Com bubble didn't get it right because their doomerism made all predictions "end of the world" level.

I don't know what you're trying to say. People had bad takes about that bubble so all bubble scepticism is discredited? But it popped, which means all these investors had bad takes as well. So...

Nobody worth listening to thinks this bubble is going to be worse than the dotcom bubble. It's simply not that big to begin with. I guess there's some wishful thinking too, but what's the alternative to this investors-expected AI growth? Everything except the AI market crashes?

The pyramids were not built by slaves. They were built by farmers during downtime, they were treated well. Pharaohs were living gods, so building for them and getting paid for it mustn't have been that different from building a cathedral.

They said the same in Massachusetts and then didn't https://www.wonkette.com/p/massachusettss-millionaire-tax-still

The article isn't about the technology. This "experiment" is pure techbro fantasy.

the real purpose of the ban is to curb the growing political awareness of young people

Hot take. Maybe people shouldn't be getting their political awareness from algorithmic sites. For every teen who learns Gaza etc there's 10 that learn about the Manosphere and how bad vaccines are.

40% of gamers: cause I didn't build it those years ago

But it only does 16x16 matrix inversion.

If you think it's a raven, it's a crow. If you think it's a cat, it's a raven.

She platformed on this, they willingly voted for it.