Comment on
Looks like r/Lemmy was banned
Interesting. I didn't know it was active really. People tend to use r/fediverse or r/redditalternatives.
Comment on
Looks like r/Lemmy was banned
Interesting. I didn't know it was active really. People tend to use r/fediverse or r/redditalternatives.
Comment on
'This affair is far from over': Disney shareholders are now revolting over Jimmy Kimmel
Reply in thread
I think the difference there is that there's no evidence of government meddling and intervention. Whereas here, there is.
Comment on
You look a bit skinny, son.
It is what it is. I have no idea how to incite a new wave short of Reddit shitting itself in some way
Comment on
What can we do about the increasing problem of these self-deleting bot accounts?
Piefed already automatically has a toggle in its settings that can be activated. On piefed.social any account that self-deletes within 24 hours has all of its posts purged.
This is a lemmy problem.
Comment on
Digg lays off staff and pulls app from stores
They launched without any community mod tools beyond "delete post" for their entire run. The site predictably got overrun as site admins had to bear all the weight.
Comment on
Lemmy walked so PieFed could run
Reply in thread
What do you mean "another migration"? Piefed and Lemmy communities and instances can be viewed from both.
Comment on
The problem of cross-community posting
Piefed groups comment boxes from crossposts into one post. So no matter which crosspost you're looking at, you'll see all responses.
Comment on
Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test
Have any of Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord implemented age-checks in Mississippi then?
If not, why is Bluesky the only one going dark there?
Comment on
Hi guys, how many of you are here as an alternative to Reddit?
I'm not banned, but I'm here because Reddit essentially in active decay. It's old. All the community names are taken. Some taken years ago. The site is too big to be effectively maintained by admins, leaving many communities badly-run, half-abandoned and being swamped by bots, trolls and whatever else. You can't grow anything there.
You can on the Fediverse. Community discoverability is by far much better on here, and the federated structure of it means that no-one can camp on communities to stop others from making it. You can just be replaced by someone else if you run it poorly.
There are many other problems too such as the site using AI to ban people, buggy notification system etc.
Comment on
[Update] AtomicPoet has deleted the piefed.social communities where he was the sole moderator ([email protected] being the exception). Content is still available, details in the linked post
Reply in thread
He wasn't moderating any large communities.
The difference here is that if this was Reddit, an out-of-control community moderator would be untouchable and they'd have a monopoly on the community name. This doesn't happen on the Fediverse.
Comment on
Meanwhile...
Said this elsewhere, but:
What's interesting to me here regarding this, is Reddits current preparation timescale for the changes here. This isn't going to be enforced until March 31st, 2026. This tells me that Reddit would have been unprepared for a complete mass-walkout of community moderators during the 2023 Reddit API strikes. A large chunk of Reddit during that period was genuinely inaccessible. But after a few token gestures and a few examples made of some especially rebellious mod-teams, most of the striking moderators returned.
A huge opportunity was missed by people running major communities to functionally degrade Reddit in at least the medium-term as a website. You can't just hastily promote random people to replace moderators Reddit is either forced to remove or who leave voluntarily. The average person is likely too lazy, too arbitrary and too corrupt to effectively oversee communities of notable sizes.
People whine about terminally online moderators being power-hungry and garbage, but I can assure you hastily promoted randoms given the keys are far worse in most cases.
Comment on
Do we need more users ?
Yes.
Do we want Reddit amounts of users? No.
But there's a lot of growth between here and there.
Comment on
Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators? Analysis inside
Reply in thread
Dbzer0 itself is very pro-AI. Or at least it has a lot of pro-AI communities.
Comment on
PieFed 1.4 is released - emoji, federated stackoverflow and AI content filters
Reply in thread
Piefed is an entirely different software. You would have to sign up to a piefed instance.
Comment on
What Reddit has become lately...
Rules of r/AskSocialScience:
All claims in top level comments must be supported by citations to relevant social science sources. No lay speculation.
This is likely why you see that.
Comment on
Bluesky blocks Mississippi users over age verification law
Also, a detail but:
https://www.pcmag.com/news/supreme-court-lets-mississippi-age-verification-law-go-into-effect-for
It's considered likely to be unconstitutional.
The ruling now allows Mississippi to enforce its social media law while case continues in the lower court. In the ruling, Kavanaugh also cited several district court rulings opposing similar age-verification laws, concluding that "the Mississippi law is likely unconstitutional."
Comment on
Just received an email from feddit.online saying they've geoblocked UK IPs due to the Online Safety Act
Reply in thread
Currently Twitter is doing the bare minimum by simply allowing UK users to bypass the age-checks by setting their location to another country.
Comment on
How will Australia's ban on youth access to social media affect instances hosted in Australia?
Apparently aussie.zone is asking users to DM evidence of being over 16, and the implication is that of those who don't - he'll ban/delete their accounts.
But absurdly enough, 4chan is exempt from this because all activity on there is anonymous. Not through accounts. So if the Fediverse had anonymous, non-account posting on-top of regular account-based posting then people could post anonymously happily, but anyone with an account would have to verify.
Make it make sense.
Comment on
Mods react as Reddit kicks some of them out again: “This will break the site”
Reply in thread
True, but Reddit let this problem fester for a long time.
What's interesting to me here regarding this, is Reddits current preparation timescale. This isn't going to be enforced until March 31st, 2026. This tells me that Reddit would have been unprepared for a complete mass-walkout of community moderators during the 2023 Reddit API strikes. A large chunk of Reddit during that period was genuinely inaccessible. But after a few token gestures and a few examples made of some especially rebellious mod-teams, most of the striking moderators returned.
A huge opportunity was missed by people running major communities to functionally degrade Reddit in at least the medium-term as a website. You can't just hastily promote random people to replace moderators Reddit is either forced to remove or who leave voluntarily. The average person is likely too lazy, too arbitrary and too corrupt to effectively oversee communities of notable sizes.
Comment on
Congratulations guys, we worked hard to build Lemmy. so we could replace Reddit dictators with Lemmy dictators
Reply in thread
The claim wasn't that the original, badly-run community no longer exists - but that viable alternative communities on other instances also do.