RISC-V CPUs with H extension?
Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?
Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?
TIL that apparently capital one was assigned the entire 2630::/16 block...which is the largest assignment I've seen to date. Does anyone know of other absolutely massive allocations...are there even any others this large?
I've been using duckduckgo for years ever since I degoogled but I'm increasingly annoyed by its complete lack of IPv6 connectivity. I use NAT64 and so it works fine but it bothers me to use services that don't have v6. Does someone have a good non-google IPv6 search engine that's privacy respecting?
I'm curious about something so I'm going to throw this thought experiment out here. For some background I run a pure IPv6 network and dove into v6 ignoring any v4 baggage so this is more of a devils advocate question than anything I genuinely believe.
Onto the question, why should I run a /64 subnet and waste all those addresses as opposed to running a /96 or even a /112?
let's assume I don't care for whatever reason and I'm content with DHCP, maybe android actually supports DHCP in this alternate universe
No applications I care about are impacted by this breakage
I don't care
What advantages does running a /64 provide over smaller subnets? Especially subnets like a /96 where address count still far exceeds usage so filling subnets remains impossible.
This has been my setup for a long time now and I have to say I still absolutely love it.