Google says that SafetyCore “provides on-device infrastructure for securely and privately performing classification to help users detect unwanted content. Users control SafetyCore, and SafetyCore only classifies specific content when an app requests it through an optionally enabled feature.”

GrapheneOS — an Android security developer — provides some comfort, that SafetyCore “doesn’t provide client-side scanning used to report things to Google or anyone else. It provides on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content as being spam, scams, malware, etc. This allows apps to check content locally without sharing it with a service and mark it with warnings for users.”

But GrapheneOS also points out that “it’s unfortunate that it’s not open source and released as part of the Android Open Source Project and the models also aren’t open let alone open source… We’d have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they’d have to be open source.” Which gets to transparency again.

TLDR: some government/military official added a reporter to a Signal group were some high profile people were discussing and sharing war plans. The app's encryption is perfectly fine. It's just clickbait.

Lol, Trump is a clown. If netflix or other big tech is charging me for using their service in my country, and they have legal presence and activity in my country, they should be charged taxes in my country because they are generating econimic activity.

I can't believe this is happening in the land of liberty. surprised pikachu face

And they called me a madman for spending months tuning the CO of my 5800X3D to its limits and also OCing my 3200 mhz Crucial Memory to 3800 Mhz. It seems this setup will stay with me until DDR6 arrives. I hope the prices get back to normal by then.

The data they have compiled from years of people using Win 10 and Msoft Edge.

I'm going to copy two comments from TPU that i think are the most accurate regarding this proposal:

This doesn't solve anything at all. You still have to plug power into the motherboard, likely via the problematic 12V6X2 connector once they extend it beyond 250W. Now you also need to dedicate additional (expensive) PCB layers and throw a lot more copper traces (expensive) at it too. It's just a glorified extension cable that adds another connector to the equation. Why go from the PSU directly to the GPU when you can now do it with extra steps!! (/s) Cable still required, but now you need a new motherboard, too.... Why? Because cables are evil, apparently and this fits the dumb BTF form factor that's all about form over function, for people with infinite wallets.

This is a stupid idea. It should be separate as always. It also makes problems worse if connector-gate happens again, as now you fry a much larger PCB instead of tiny GPU board. And high power means you need to worry about heat on the mobo now too. It makes repair difficult too. But I'm not surprised. Asus always sucked on the user friendly aspect. Worst customer support. Apparently that's the trend to keep up with the "You'll own nothing and be happy" motto of stream everything, throwaway everything, get in debt all the time mentality.

Nope. Third world's are better… actually, third world countries are trying to emulate us labor laws to make the employees easier to fire.

William: hates his uncle. Also william: i'm gonna name my first born Alexander Adolf

XDA is asking for disabling my adblocker? WTF? I guess i won't be reading the article.

Netflix tried to buy, but WB CEO is asking stupid amounts of money.

List of models affected?

That's exactly what's going on here. Narrative / concepts are in stake here. By controlling the narrative you can influence or alter the perception of people about things.

Interesting article.

Data center buildouts take about three to six years to complete, and the largest hyperscale facilities can easily cost several billion dollars, meaning that these moves are extremely forward-looking. You don’t build a data center for the demand you have now, but for the demand you expect further down the line. This suggests that Microsoft believes its current infrastructure (and its likely scaled-back plans for expansion) will be sufficient for a movement that CEO Satya Nadella called a "golden age for systems" less than a year ago.

To explain here, TD Cowen is effectively saying that Microsoft is responding to a "major demand signal" and said "major demand signal" is saying "you do not need more data centers." Said demand signal that Microsoft was responding to, in TD Cowen's words, is its "appetite for capacity" to provide servers to OpenAI, and it seems that said appetite is waning, and Microsoft no longer wants to build out data centers for OpenAI.

I believe the reason Microsoft is cutting back is that it does not have the appetite to provide further data center expansion for OpenAI, and it’s having doubts about the future of generative AI as a whole. If Microsoft believed there was a massive opportunity in supporting OpenAI's further growth, or that it had "massive demand" for generative AI services, there would be no reason to cancel capacity, let alone cancel such a significant amount.

This is great news. It's unfortunate that the 8 years of updates is limited to qualcomm flagship chip, anyway it's still a step in the right direction. My phone will be 8 years this year and it survived this long because of custom ROMs that don't support this device anymore, so i'm all in for this types of policies.

Exactly my thoughts.

Couldn't they just go to Tor like zlib did?

Here's a reply from an ―allegedly― ex-employee at Msft you can find in the comment section of the article:

There is a lot of confusion on this thread between NVMe Storage Controller drivers and Disk drivers, e.g. "we have always been able to replace NVMe drivers". Previous driver releases, e.g. by Samsung, are for the NVMe Storage Controller, which you don't see in Device Manager unless you view by connection. The inbox driver is "Standard NVM Express Controller" or stornvme.sys. Samsung's driver was secnvme.sys.

The title of this TPU story is misleading; there is no new NVMe (controller) driver, there is a new disk layer driver nvmedisk.sys that is just an optimization of disk.sys that provides marginally better performance for NVMe drives (some SCSI command translations removed; multiple queues supported; presumably latency optimization and cache flush behavior). This is not really an "NVMe driver" because it's not the controller driver. The disk layer driver is not super specific to a particular storage medium; this is just optimization to pair better with stornvme. It's possible that you could force install nvmedisk.sys on HDD and it may even work, albeit unreliably and/or slowly.

Source: I worked at MS for decades. You know that checkbox in Device Manager for drives that says "Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device"? That was me.

It doesn't matter now. All those idiots who wrote books about how good the mataverse was, how it was going to change our lives, how we will be able to talk to costumer support in a virtual office from our house… all those people who wrote about it did the leap to talk about AI and now are writing about how good AI is… goshhhh

Curiosity matters.