By the way, I'm the only one of us that ever got upvoted, so sure you won the hearts and minds (who the fuck cares about that lmao) and noone's reading this shit now

You were the one making unnecessary corrections when quoting me to begin with, and now you're so upset about it that you typed up another paragraph. Anyways, lemmy.ml does not engage in censorship while the liberal instances that keep accusing it of doing so do, and you have not provided a single argument against that even once, so I guess you must agree. Good luck becoming an English teacher or something!

Reading comprehension != grammar and spelling, you completely missed the mark there, bud. Also, you're wrong with the "y'all" thing. "Y'all" means "you all", while "ya'll" means "you will". (I do not care what Wikipedia says.)

You're a walking Dunning-Kruger lol

And your definition of censorship (which is a pretty bad and inaccurate one imo) is functionally useless here: of course it's technically also censorship when you ban a zionists account spreading hate speech, but that's you getting hung up on technicalities once again, it's getting tiring.

It's very obvious that banning single posts or users because of their own behavior is not the same a banning tens of thousands of users because of their alleged ideological alignment.

(Also very funny how you're trying to use increasingly complex grammatical structures and obscure phrasing in an attempt to sound smart, especially after you heard that English is my third language lmao. Must suck that my writing is still generally more legible than yours, even with all the grammar checks in the world.)

Look, a really easy to understand analogy:

Let's imagine there's a gang from Denmark that Swedish people allege always come across the border to yell insults at Swedes. Swedes don't like this. The lemmy.world (and other liberal instances) approach would be to close the border to Denmark, because clearly Danish people are evil. They also find it quite nice that those pesky Danes can't come over and make them question their extremely ideologicalized worldview anymore, but of course they won't admit to that reason.

The .ml approach would be to ban the people crossing the border to yell insults while letting the other Danes still cross without issue, because anything else would be ridiculous. They accept that people have opinions, and also lemmy would be quite boring without liberal idealists to poke fun at.

Capiche?

Where do you shit? How is the sewage system constructed? Who owns it? Who operates it? What wages are they paid? Entirely unpolitical, yes?

Also, if you're going to introduce superfluous corrections when quoting someone speaking their third language, at least spell "y'all" correctly. Ya won't. (Maybe use that grammar checker you seem to be so fond of?)

As I said, it's not a minor difference in moderation style, it's a complete qualitative difference. One is censorship, the other isn't, and it's pretty funny how you're trying to pretend otherwise

I mean you can tell yourself that and create insane high effort grammar analysis, or you can accept that there's a qualitative difference between selective moderation of content that infringes on rules and defederation from huge instances and all of their content.

One is in fact totally fair and something I expect from my instances moderation, the other is ideologically motivated blanket censorship for the purpose of keeping dissenting opinions from spreading.

You still haven't provided any proof of your accusations, you're mostly just being annoying.

Nothing a human in society has ever done is unpolitical.

Reading comprehension really is in a bad state, huh? Banning an entire instance for wrongthink is what the liberal instances like lemmy.world are doing, 'defederating', while .ml acts on a case to case basis. Please start reading properly instead of going on these long rants.

Even if your accusation were true, I'd much rather have content blocks handled on a user/post basis rather than defederating from huge instances because they supposedly contain wrongthink, like most liberal instances do.

The topic that was being discussed was your claim that lemmy.ml suppresses any dissenting opinion. You have yet to provide evidence for this claim, instead you typed up a bunch of paragraphs comparing me to two different species of animal trying to tie it all together into some kind of gotcha?

That wasn't the issue that was being discussed, but sure, I'm happy that my instance censors fascist scum. You seem to have an issue with that, which seems to be a common theme with liberals.

Yes, censorship is important for some topics, for example Zionists should not be able to spread their opinions. Neither should racists or sexists. Sure, you can disagree with that, but that'd be pretty wack.

No, it just doesn't accept wack opinions, which is totally fair. World consists of mostly wack opinions, while piefed is created with the purpose of only showing wack opinions.

Is this post satire?

"Stalin was a communist leader inspired by Leon Trotsky"??? The two were massive rivals with completely different ideologies.

Because Rosie the Riveter was also war propaganda designed to get more women involved in the slaughter of innocents. It has nothing to do with Socialist ideals.

Love how you can clearly see people still benefitting from Socialism, decades after it's been abolished.

The Prusa printers are nice enough, but very expensive for what you get. There are a lot of far better value options, especially the Prusa bedslingers are quickly becoming very noticably outdated.

If you want a reason to dislike them, they collaborated with an Israeli company called Filament2 not too long ago.

However, noone can inspect the source code and see if encryption is implemented properly, or at all.

Small businesses are often worse, since there's less oversight, more willingness to gamble on 'risks', a need for higher margins to stay afloat and generally fewer different interests at stake. The issue is private ownership in itself, not how that private ownership is structured.

It really is your own decision to get offended at people trying to educate you by citing sources.