Spyke

Replies

games

Comment on

Epic explains why it hasn't sued Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft over 30% fee

Reply in thread

I'll happily pay these 30% if it means I get quality services for them:

  • high speed download servers
  • reliable cloud saves
  • automatic, non intrusive updates
  • discussion forums
  • easy mod management
  • friend networking, multiplayer services
  • responsive and uncomplicated support

(using Steam as an example here)

People always act like those are to be taken as granted, but if you have ever worked in dev/devops, you would know that there's a lot of work maintaining each one of them.

Also, you can use these services for as long as you want, despite paying for them with a single one-time purchase.

Of course, if the platform doesn't provide any services or benefits, your point stands. In that case just avoid it.

games

Comment on

Starfield, is it getting review bombed?

Reply in thread

Metacritic's user rating system is just shit. You see the game rated higher than deserved and you can either

  • give it an honest rating resulting in the total score dropping by 0.01
  • give it a zero rating and have the score drop by 0.1

Of course most people chose to rate it in a way that has more impact on the total score, so it's no wonder we see 0/10 and 10/10 more than anything else.

This phenomenon will be even more exaggerated if critics ratings are undeservedly high, as is the case with Starfield.

games

Comment on

Starfield, is it getting review bombed?

Reply in thread

The reason it's lower on metacritic is mainly due to the fact that the critics rating is too high, imo. This leads to disappointed players leaving extra bad scores (i.e. 0/10) to offset the total score. In a way that's review bombing, but only as a reaction to the inflated critics' reviews (which I often suspect to be bought or bribed).

Usually the Steam reviews are a lot more reliable. As I said, metacritic's system is shit and encourages rating manipulation.

You reached the end