translation: "I don't like you. Therefore, you deserve to have your civil liberties violated."

Yes I really should. Perhaps a professional would clarify whether I'm perceiving reality correctly -- that is, after having posted on incels.is, a fed honeypot forum, I came under intrusive monitoring and was placed on a watchlist for 1st amendment protected speech and whether feds trail me online to accuse me of being schizo whenever I make these claims. A professional could indeed help me make sense of these things but currently I am uninsured and have no choice but to seek the advice of the masses.

This is an obscure social media platform. I am censored on the major ones (facebook, twitter, youtube.) Twitter is the only major social media network I can speak my mind and you already how much they hate Musk. Also a lot of the people replying her and the same feds trailing me all over the web (except twitter where they're reluctant to engage me.)

thx fed

could you elaborate?

I wanted to hang out with men who felt romantically and sexually deprived. Instead I ended up at a space --incels.is -- run by the Department of Homeland Security. They have internet staff that larp as incels across various spaces. This is how they "disrupted" the incel scene. If government power is then deployed against incels, why shouldn't it also be deployed against globohomo types?

That's because they have no grounds to. However, that operation -- incels.is -- is illegal because they hack their users and even mere readers.

Okay. How about this. Look at these papers.

https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/24162/Hoffman_2020_SCT_Assessingthreat_AAM.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371229307_Beyond_violent_extremism_A_3N_perspective_of_inceldom

These are "security researchers" calling on the government to treat incels just like I've been treated. There. Now are my claims more plausible? Of course, these people have their own biases and political prejudices, whether feminist, whether concerned about Trump, whether concerned about "is it good for the Jews." But for sure they have the ear of the government.

yes, my schizo mind thought it was under "intrusive monitoring" under the "Countering Violent Extremism" program aimed at domestic dissidents. My schizo mind reached the conclusion that feds -- in order to better monitor me -- rented apartments next to mine. What a preposterous thing to believe, only a schizo would think feds would do that.

That did happen. Could be just schizo though. Feds would never be so hateful.

Of course the "issue" is "important" to me. "Countering Violent Extremism" is "precrime" and violates civil liberties. I've been subject to intrusive monitoring -- an open air prison. So yes, it bothers me because I haven't done anything wrong beyond speaking vociferously in favor of the "emergent polygyny" hypothesis. I have a fire in the belly indeed. I want the people who did this to go to jail.

Speaking of that:

https://twitter.com/WrongedIncel/status/1691768737710444917

But feds are selfish and lazy chodes and susceptible to (((bribery))). After all, the War on Terror has winded down and they constructed all these fusion centers for which they have no real use beyond targeting domestic dissidents. See Glenn Greenwald's critique of the new paradigm wherein DHS isn't as much concerned about foreign threats but more about domestic dissidents. Incels -- who only say they are romantically deprived and that emergent polygyny (women sharing Gorgeous Males) is not a non-factor -- have been deemed a threat on the flimsiest of pretenses because they (incels) give the jeebies to feminists and Jews who were supportive of the same Sexual Revolution that ultimately resulted in an incel class. The excerpt was written thirty years ago. It's gotten much worse. Why aren't incels then treated like a political party rather than as extremists? Who do the security agencies really serve? Why are some people so automatically trusting of them as if they aren't infallible and suspectable to influence while having selfish organizational interests?

"how do I know you're not a security agent yourself?" I am legit the only person willing to say incels.is = DHS. Would a security agent say that? Incels.is = DHS. They've "interrupted" the incel scene, surreptitiously banned incel spaces in order to direct would be incel posters to spaces they control. The novelty of my perspective should give me credibility.

https://twitter.com/WrongedIncel

When I posted on the web forum incels.is, to my surprise and shock I learned that it was a DHS operation. The feds there themselves encourage extremist rhetoric. Just imagine how unfair this is. They haven't publicly announced that they are censoring incels but have in fact done so. They then set up honeypot forums where feds larp as incels and feed the public image of incels as one of extremism and violence. A user ends up there thinking this is what incel culture is and then gets subject to being put on a watchlist. It's the government itself calling for censorship and restrictions on free speech, something I know all too well given my incels.is (run by DHS) experience.

so you justify the censorship of incels and their treatment as domestic terrorists?

note: feds have real time access to my digital activity. every time i make claims like this on this space, they appear like rats and insubstantially say "you need help, take your meds, blah blah" but never care to get to specific as to why my claims are unreasonable. also messages like the above

When you google "incels" at a place like google scholar, almost all the material is from globohomo type academics demonizing them and calling for their intrusive monitoring by the security sector. those two articles are but just two examples. because the war on terror has winded down, in incels wolfish feds see a bounty justifying their fed jobs.