There are no "semitic people". The term was invented 1879 by William Marr and he definetly meant jews and not arabs.

I am using Ultra.cc, and do not have issues with seeding

You call everyone who does not fully support your view a "genocide denier" and "disgusting"? Comon... Is this your argument?

Yes, after the horrific attack on Israeli civilians, many politicians were emotional and understandably so, I might add. But yes, there are obviously some right wingers in the Israeli government who might commit a genocide or at least ethnic cleansing. I don't deny that. But the most important part of the government does not have the intention for genocide.

The IDF warns civilians in gaza before attacks, has field hospitals, hospital ships and even let's in humanitarian aid to gaza, even when a big majority in the population of Israel is against such aid. How does this fit with it this narrative of genocide.

Like I said: Words matter here. There are war crimes in this war, which is bad enough, but genocide is the worst crime in international law, and the word gets thrown around like it's nothing. This trivializes the whole debate...

This claim, which is older than the war in gaza is a way to demonize Israel.

I agree that this is whataboutism.

But all this being called names on Lemmy makes me a bit cynical. I honestly apologize and edit my post.

Words are cheap nowadays. Read the Israeli answer to the South African claim in The Hague. The intent, which is important in the definition of genocide, is completly lacking. There are some war crimes, but not genocide, at least not at the moment.

Just one more thing: The IDF warns civilians before bombing. Which other army in the world does that? (To be fair: according to the BBC there are some mistakes in the information.)

::: spoiler whataboutism So Hamas is not using human shields and hospitals as bases? :::

Like I implied, obviously not everything is well in Israel. But generally, the term "pink washing" is not useful. Also the war in gaza is not a genocide, but that's a different topic, I guess.

Edit: Andrei S. Markovits https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Markovits

Edit 2: This is no appeal to authority, the argument is good.

Like Andrei S. Markovits once said, some criticisim of Israel is really "damned if you do, and damned if you don't". When Israel would discriminate against LGBTQ like other countries in the middle east, it would be used against them. But if it does not, it is still used against Israel. What do you want Israel to do? Discriminate against LGBTQ or not? You're just against Israel per se, let's be honest. I think this is really unfair criticism.

You could name Netanyahu anything in the world. Why call him a nazi?

Sorry, the claim that Netanyahu is a nazi, is historically wrong and trivializes the nazis.