I know the admins have unquestionable integrity (they certainly pretend as much) so surely they are going to retroactively pay every user who contributed their benchmarks for free. Right? When should I expect my first royalty check?

nobody cares about your "friendly remainders". We're talking about software here, not politics.

Nah. I care. You dont speak for me. I cant tell if you're a shill for Brave or a MAGAt or both.

Good. Fuck everything about Facebook and their advertising empire. Let it burn.

Hmm. On second thought, I'll fire up A1111 and start making fakes to fuel the fire.

Sorry, best we can do is some unrelated ASCII art.

BetterHelp is a scam.

the morning light hit my stove’s greasy backsplash in just the right way to reveal a finger-traced drawing of a dick ’n’ balls spraying a few fingertip-dots of jizz.

Us mere mortals can only dream of writing this perfect, for indeed here we have an example of prose from an artist at the pinnacle of the form.

Intentionally inflammatory and misleading headlines on Lemmy? Pshaw. The hell you say.

I like how the secret control room is below the ancient nameless evil.

It sounds like exactly what I would want, if it were open source, audited, and under my direct control.

https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues//Charlie.html

You heard it here first.

2024: Year of the Linux Desktop

Upvoted solely on the basis of having a video thumbnail that isn't cancer.

which is not that uncommon at a tech company.

That's a super tenuous connection. Having their name listed as a partner of a cyber alliance doesnt mean much.

Quad9 is entirely subject to Swiss privacy law, and the Swiss government extends that protection of the law to Quad9's users throughout the world, regardless of citizenship or country of residence

They are not at all subject to City of London laws.

Got anything concrete or...?

Of course not. This is Lemmy, where like 90% of our memes are hand-me-downs. It was about a year ago.

https://boingboing.net/2022/02/10/brilliant-star-trek-vs-star-wars-trick-in-the-new-york-times-crossword-puzzle.html

Source? That doesn't match up with their published numbers, so I'm skeptical. Post up a source if you're going to make such an absurd claim.

Their endowment is around $100MM USD, as of 2021, which is nowhere near enough to cover their operating costs just from interest. Unless they're somehow obtaining 112% interest...

Revenue: $162.9 million (2021)

Expenses: $111.8 million (2021)

Endowment: $100 million (2021)

Source(s) here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation

So you could argue that they got plenty of donations in 2021, I suppose. But that's a very different claim.

More likely, though, you're just talking out of your ass and have no idea how finances work.

People couldnt see the Grand Pricks because of the condoms. Dick move.

Because reasons.

Right-of-way, right-o'way, utility easement

It's said brain.

OGLAF