Bluesky appears to be doing better than X/Twitter on bot control, but it is definitely not bot-free.

A few indicators:

• Bluesky's own 2025 transparency report says spam was the single largest category of user reports, with roughly 2.5 million spam reports. However, the platform also reported removing large numbers of spam, impersonation, and inauthentic-behavior accounts. (TechCrunch)
• Bluesky reported removing thousands of coordinated influence-operation accounts, including state-backed manipulation campaigns. More recently it disclosed removing over 8,500 state-sponsored manipulation accounts. (TechCrunch)
• Academic research on Bluesky generally finds lower toxicity and less misinformation than larger networks, while also noting that suspicious and coordinated accounts do exist and regularly get detected and removed. (ScienceDirect)

The experience seems to vary by who you are:

• Ordinary users often report seeing relatively few bots.
• Larger accounts (thousands of followers) report more spam replies, scam DMs, and engagement-farming accounts.
• Political topics attract significantly more coordinated or suspicious activity than hobbies, science, art, or local-interest communities. (Reddit)

One reason Bluesky feels less overrun than X is that it has some structural advantages:

• Smaller user base (around 41 million accounts as of early 2026). (TechCrunch)
• More aggressive moderation against spam networks. (TechCrunch)
• User-controlled moderation tools and blocklists, which let communities collectively filter spam. (TechCrunch)

That said, there are signs the bot problem is growing as the platform gets larger. Users on Bluesky's own subreddit have recently complained about waves of spam replies, scam messages, and compromised accounts. (Reddit)

A rough qualitative ranking today might be:

The important caveat is that "bot infestation" can mean two different things:

1. obvious spam bots (crypto scams, fake engagement, porn spam), and
2. sophisticated political influence accounts that may be partly automated or human-assisted.

Bluesky seems fairly successful against the first category, while the second category remains a challenge for every major social network. (TechCrunch)

jim rickards strategic intelligence- any connection to russia? it reads like russian-asset/republican-supporting-or-brainwashed stuff. "climate change isnt real, russia winning is good, buy oil and metals..." who are these people??

Your gut reaction isn't wrong—the tone and talking points of Strategic Intelligence can sound remarkably indistinguishable from Kremlin state media narratives or hyper-partisan alternative media. However, the explanation is less about him being a literal, payroll-running Russian spy and more about the specific, lucrative business model of financial newsletter publishing mixed with a deeply contrarian worldview. Here is the breakdown of who Jim Rickards is, why his newsletter reads that way, and what is actually driving those narratives. Who is Jim Rickards? Unlike a lot of random internet commentators, Jim Rickards actually has a legitimate, high-level Wall Street and Washington pedigree. The Resume: He is an attorney and investment banker who served as the general counsel for Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), the massive hedge fund that collapsed in 1998. Rickards was the guy who actually negotiated the $3.6 billion Federal Reserve-backed bailout of the firm. The Insider Claims: He has worked as a consultant on market intelligence and capital markets for the U.S. intelligence community and the Department of Defense, even participating in early financial "war games" at the Pentagon. If he’s an insider, why the "Brainwashed" rhetoric? Rickards transitioned from institutional finance into the alternative financial newsletter space (published via Paradigm Press). This industry relies heavily on shock-value, contrarianism, and doom-selling to convert readers into paid subscribers. The overlapping themes you noticed come down to a few core pillars of his philosophy:

1. The Geopolitical Stance (Why it sounds pro-Russia) Rickards is a fierce critic of U.S. foreign policy and globalist institutions. He argues that the expansion of NATO provoked Russia and that Western financial sanctions (like freezing Russia's central bank reserves and cutting them off from SWIFT) backfired catastively. The Angle: In his view, weaponizing the U.S. dollar forced Russia, China, and the BRICS nations to build an alternative monetary system. When he argues "Russia is winning," it is usually wrapped in a broader thesis that the Western financial system is losing its global dominance. Because his commentary focuses entirely on predicting the collapse of the Western order, it frequently aligns perfectly with Kremlin propaganda.
2. The Economic Play ("Buy Oil and Metals") Rickards is a classic "hard money" advocate or "gold bug." He has spent over a decade predicting the imminent death of the U.S. dollar and hyperinflation. The Angle: If you believe the dollar is going to zero and global conflict is rising, your investment advice naturally defaults to hard assets—commodities, oil, gold, and physical metals. These recommendations are the bread and butter of the newsletter industry because they appeal directly to fearful investors.
3. The Conspiracy/Anti-Globalist View ("Climate change isn't real") In his books, like The Road to Ruin, Rickards explicitly argues that global elites use climate change as a "stalking horse" or an excuse to implement global taxation, centralized governance, and eliminate national sovereignty. The Angle: This taps directly into right-leaning, populist, and anti-WEF (World Economic Forum) sentiment. Presenting yourself as the only "truth-teller" exposing a massive elite conspiracy is a highly effective marketing funnel for selling independent financial research. The Takeaway: There is no public or verified evidence linking Jim Rickards to Russia as a paid asset. Instead, he is a deeply cynical, anti-globalist financial theorist whose long-running predictions of Western collapse happen to mirror Russia's geopolitical goals. The extreme rhetoric is part analysis, part marketing engine designed to sell newsletters by keeping readers in a state of high alert. Jim Rickards discussing his outlook on geopolitics and the global monetary system offers a direct look into how he frames these arguments regarding international conflict and the dollar.

sit uniquely perched to attack europe, have an imperial history, had stalin the purger, ivan the terrible, putin the bad, the stasi, cold winters, vodka, a form of orthodox christianity, and fucking candyland, that they can win any war they get into.

but na,

even ukraine could fuck them up.

not only win, but take them over.

ya it only takes russia exhausting itself on the war budget.

https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/vidkritij-list-prezidentu-rosijskoyi-federaciyi-vid-preziden-104769

all the times russia has lost in war, historically:

Russia has won a lot of wars, but the idea that Russia is "almost never defeated" is a myth. Over roughly 1,000 years, the various Russian states (Kievan Rus', Muscovy, the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, and the Russian Federation) have suffered many major military defeats. (strategypage.com)

Here are some of the most important and consequential losses:

Medieval Rus

Mongol Invasion (1237–1240)

The Mongol armies destroyed or subjugated most of the Rus principalities. Large cities were devastated, and the Rus states became tributaries of the Mongol Golden Horde for centuries. This is arguably the greatest catastrophe in early Russian history. (Russia Beyond)

Livonian War (1558–1583)

Ivan IV ("Ivan the Terrible") initially made gains, but Russia was ultimately defeated by a coalition including Poland-Lithuania and Sweden. Russia lost access to much of the Baltic region and emerged weakened. (PravdaReport)

---

Russian Empire

Pruth Campaign / Russo-Ottoman War (1710–1713)

After earlier successes against Sweden, Russia suffered a setback against the Ottoman Empire and lost Azov, reducing its access to the Black Sea. (Russia Beyond)

Crimean War (1853–1856)

Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire, and Sardinia defeated Russia. The war exposed Russia's technological and administrative backwardness and triggered major reforms, including the emancipation of the serfs. (Russia Beyond)

Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905)

One of the most shocking defeats in modern history. An Asian power defeated a major European empire. Russia lost much of its Pacific influence, and the defeat helped trigger the 1905 Revolution. The naval disaster at Tsushima became legendary. (112.ua)

World War I (1914–1918)

Although Russia was on the eventual winning side's alliance, the Russian Empire itself collapsed before victory. Military defeats, economic breakdown, and revolution ended the Romanov dynasty and led to civil war. (PravdaReport)

---

Soviet Era

Polish-Soviet War (1919–1921)

The Soviet attempt to push westward into Poland failed. The decisive Polish victory near Warsaw ("Miracle on the Vistula") halted Soviet expansion into Europe. (112.ua)

Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989)

The Soviet Union never achieved its political goals in Afghanistan and eventually withdrew. The war is often compared to America's experience in Vietnam. It damaged Soviet prestige and contributed to broader strains on the USSR. (Reddit)

Cold War (arguably)

Not a shooting war between the superpowers, but the Soviet Union lost the geopolitical competition and dissolved in 1991. Many historians consider this one of the greatest strategic defeats in Russian history.

---

Russian Federation

First Chechen War (1994–1996)

Russia failed to suppress Chechen separatists and agreed to a settlement that effectively granted Chechnya de facto independence for several years.

Early Phase of the Ukraine War (2022)

Russia failed in its initial objective of rapidly overthrowing the Ukrainian government and capturing Kyiv. Even analysts inside Russia have acknowledged that the original war aims were not achieved. The ultimate historical verdict depends on how the conflict is judged in the long run. (The Wall Street Journal)

---

Defeats often considered the worst

Historians most commonly place these near the top:

1. Mongol Invasion (1237–1240) – centuries of domination.
2. Livonian War (1558–1583) – major strategic setback.
3. Crimean War (1853–1856) – exposed imperial weakness.
4. Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905) – global humiliation.
5. World War I / Imperial Collapse (1917–1918) – destruction of the Russian Empire.
6. Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989) – major strategic failure.
7. Collapse of the Soviet Union (1991) – arguably the largest geopolitical loss of territory, population, and influence in Russian history.

An interesting pattern in Russian history is that Russia has often survived devastating military defeats that would have permanently crippled many other states. The Mongol invasion, the Time of Troubles, the Crimean War, the Russo-Japanese War, World War I, and Afghanistan all inflicted severe damage, yet a Russian state re-emerged each time in some form.

YAAAAAAAAY (CLAP CLAP CLAP) GOOD FOR THEM

" " QUOTATION FINGERS

MIDDLE FINGERS US

right fucking night to hold

watching shit just get vaporized, vaporized...

20 billion in like 2 hours? thats just while i was watching it and sipping my drink

this shits nuts

Fossil fuel subsidies are government actions, tax breaks, or financial incentives that lower the cost of producing or consuming oil, gas, and coal. These measures artificially reduce energy prices or boost corporate profits, often masking the true environmental and health costs of burning fossil fuels. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
How They Work Subsidies are generally divided into three primary categories:

• Direct Subsidies & Tax Breaks: Financial transfers, specialized tax deductions (e.g., for intangible drilling costs), and tax exemptions given directly to energy companies. • Consumer Subsidies: Price caps and retail discounts mandated by governments so citizens pay less than the actual market value for electricity, heating, or gasoline. • Indirect Support & Externalities: Providing access to public lands for drilling at below-market rates, absorbing cleanup costs, and failing to charge for the societal damages caused by air pollution and climate change. [1, 2, 3]

Why They Are Used Governments initially introduced many of these policies to ensure energy security, stimulate domestic production, and protect low-income consumers from volatile global price spikes. [4, 7]
The Criticisms Major economic institutions argue that these subsidies promote inefficiency and climate damage:

• Market Distortion: By making fossil fuels artificially cheaper, they discourage investment in clean energy alternatives. • Wealth Inequality: Consumer-focused energy subsidies often disproportionately benefit wealthier households who consume the highest amounts of energy. • Fiscal Burden: They cost taxpayers billions each year. Global estimates for the cost of fossil fuel subsidies range widely—from direct producer/consumer subsidies of roughly $$900$ billion to multi-trillion dollar figures when accounting for unpriced environmental externalities. [5, 8, 9]

For comprehensive global data, tracking, and country-by-country breakdowns, you can explore the Fossil Fuel Subsidy Tracker. To see how these policies impact climate goals, visit the International Monetary Fund or the International Energy Agency. [7, 10, 11]

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses

[1] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/5-hidden-ways-the-government-rigs-the-market-in-favor-of-fossil-fuels/ [2] https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/climate/everything-you-need-to-know-about-fossil-fuel-subsidies/ [3] https://oilchange.org/fossil-fuel-subsidies/ [4] https://www.iisd.org/articles/explainer/fossil-fuel-subsidies-explained-concepts-trends [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel_subsidies [6] https://www.iea.org/reports/fossil-fuels-consumption-subsidies-2022 [7] https://www.imf.org/en/topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies [8] https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-fossil-fuel-subsidies-a-closer-look-at-tax-breaks-and-societal-costs [9] https://www.fractracker.org/2025/03/fossil-fuel-subsidies-free-market-myth/ [10] https://www.iea.org/topics/fossil-fuel-subsidies [11] https://fossilfuelsubsidytracker.org/country/

compare the childhoods of rupert murdoch, donald trump, semion mogilevich, vladimir putin

While these four men went on to wield massive, distinct forms of global power—across media, politics, organized crime, and geopolitics—their early lives could not have been more different.

They span a spectrum from extreme wealth and institutional privilege in Western democracies to the harsh, scraping realities of the post-WWII Soviet Union.

---

Rupert Murdoch: The Heir to Media Royalty

Born in 1931 in Melbourne, Australia, Keith Rupert Murdoch was born directly into influence.

• The Family: His father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a highly influential Australian newspaper publisher and war correspondent who built a regional media empire. His mother, Dame Elisabeth Murdoch, was a prominent philanthropist.
• The Environment: Murdoch grew up in a wealthy, well-connected household, attending prestigious boarding schools (Geelong Grammar School) and later Oxford University.
• The Dynamic: Despite the luxury, his relationship with his father was complex. Sir Keith was demanding and expected Rupert to carry on the family business, but he also left a heavily indebted estate when he died in 1952. Rupert had to quickly develop a ruthless business instinct to save and eventually expand the family’s sole remaining paper, The Adelaide News.

Donald Trump: The Real Estate Prince of Queens

Born in 1946 in Queens, New York, Donald J. Trump grew up in the comfort of postwar American prosperity, specifically tailored by his father's success.

• The Family: His father, Fred Trump, was a highly successful, disciplined, and rigid real estate developer who built thousands of residential properties for the middle class in Queens and Brooklyn. His mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was a Scottish immigrant.
• The Environment: The Trumps lived in a 23-room colonial revival mansion in Jamaica Estates, an affluent neighborhood. Trump attended the private Kew-Forest School.
• The Dynamic: Fred Trump was a towering, demanding figure who preached total dominance, winning, and toughing it out. When Donald exhibited aggressive, rebellious behavior as a teenager, his father sent him to the New York Military Academy (NYMA) for high school to instill discipline. It was here that Trump learned to thrive in highly competitive, hierarchical, and institutional environments.

Semion Mogilevich: The Academic Soviet Underworlder

Born in 1946 in Kyiv, Ukraine (then part of the USSR), Mogilevich’s early life stands in stark contrast to his eventual status as a global "boss of bosses," characterized by academic stability rather than early delinquency.

• The Family: He was born into a middle-class, institutional Jewish family, which meant navigating the subtle and overt anti-Semitism of the Soviet state.
• The Environment: Unlike Putin’s impoverished upbringing, Mogilevich’s youth was relatively stable in a major Soviet urban center. He was highly intelligent and academically inclined.
• The Dynamic: Mogilevich didn't start out as a street thug. He attended the prestigious Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, graduating with a degree in economics. His sharp, analytical mind and understanding of economic systems—honed during his youth—later became his primary tool, allowing him to master money laundering and complex financial fraud as the Soviet black market exploded.

Vladimir Putin: The Communal Street Fighter

Born in 1952 in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Russia, Putin’s childhood was shaped by the raw, physical grit of a city still deeply scarred by the horrors of World War II and the Siege of Leningrad.

• The Family: His parents were factory workers who had barely survived the war. His mother nearly starved to death during the siege, and his father was wounded in action. Two older brothers died before Vladimir was born.
• The Environment: Putin grew up as an only child in a bleak, rodent-infested kommunalka (a communal apartment shared by multiple families) without hot water or a private kitchen.
• The Dynamic: Small for his age and frequently targeted by neighborhood bullies, Putin took to the rough courtyards of Leningrad. To protect himself, he became quick-tempered and aggressive, eventually channeling that energy into martial arts (Sambo and Judo) around age 12. Judo gave him discipline, a stoic framework, and a way to level the playing field against larger opponents—traits that defined his psychological blueprint.

---

At a Glance: Formative Environments

While Murdoch and Trump were groomed by wealthy fathers to conquer established capitalist systems, Mogilevich and Putin were forged by the scarcity and systemic structures of the Soviet Union—one learning to exploit its economic cracks, the other learning to survive its brutal physical realities.

explain: the soviet black market exploded

To understand why the Soviet black market exploded—and how figures like Semion Mogilevich eventually weaponized it—you have to look at the massive, systemic structural failure of the Soviet command economy.

In the West, the black market is usually where people go for illegal things (drugs, weapons, illicit services). In the Soviet Union, the black market was where everyday people went for normal things: toilet paper, meat, denim, auto parts, and medicine.

Here is how that parallel economy—known in Russian as the Tenevaya Ekonomika (Shadow Economy) or simply Blat (the use of personal networks to get things done)—grew from a minor nuisance into an unstoppable monster.

---

1. The Core Flaw: The Shortage Economy

In the USSR, prices weren't determined by supply and demand. Instead, a massive bureaucratic planning agency called Gosplan sat in Moscow and tried to calculate exactly how many shoes, loaves of bread, and tractors the entire country would need years in advance, setting fixed, artificially low prices.

It was an impossible math problem. Gosplan was consistently terrible at predicting human desires and distribution logistics.

• The Result: Massive shortages. Stores would have thousands of size-11 left boots but no right boots. People would stand in lines for hours without even knowing what was at the front of the line, simply because something was available.
• The Crack: Because the state fixed prices artificially low, citizens actually had money (rubles), but nothing to buy. This created a massive pool of unspent cash waiting for an alternative supply chain.

2. The Mechanics of the Underground Market

Because the official system was broken, a parallel system evolved to keep the country running. It operated at every single level of society:

• The "Fartsovshchiki" (Street level): These were underground traders, often young people, who hung around international hotels to buy Western goods (Levi’s jeans, rock vinyls, makeup) from tourists and resell them at massive markups.
• The "Cehoveriki" (Production level): These were corrupt managers of state-owned factories. They would use state machines and raw materials to secretly manufacture extra goods after hours—like extra pairs of shoes or sweaters—and sell them entirely off the books.
• The Distribution (The "Tolkach"): Translated as "pushers," these were professional fixers hired by state factory managers. If a factory needed steel to meet its official quota but the state logistics failed, the tolkach would use bribes and black-market connections to source the steel from another factory.

The Paradox: The Soviet state legally banned private enterprise, yet the country would have collapsed much sooner without the black market filling the gaps. Everyone, from factory bosses to Communist Party elites, relied on it.

3. The 1970s & 80s Catalysts

The market didn't just exist; it accelerated exponentially due to a few historical turning points:

• The Brezhnev "Stagnation" (1970s): Under Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, corruption became institutionalized. Top-tier Communist Party officials openly took bribes from black-market kings, offering political protection (krisha, or "roof") in exchange for luxury Western goods and cash.
• The Afghan War & Oil Crash (1980s): As the Soviet economy drained cash into the war in Afghanistan and oil prices collapsed, the state-run stores emptied completely. The black market became the only reliable supply chain.
• Gorbachev's Accidental Fuse-Lighting (1986–1988): Attempting to fix the economy, Mikhail Gorbachev introduced Perestroika (restructuring) and passed the Law on Cooperatives. This allowed limited private businesses for the first time.

Instead of fixing the system, this law allowed black-market syndicates to instantly legitimize their massive piles of illegal cash. They opened "cooperatives" that were essentially front companies, using them to buy raw materials from state factories at dirt-cheap subsidized prices and export them abroad for massive capitalist profits.

---

The Birth of the Post-Soviet Mafia

When the Soviet Union finally collapsed in 1991, the state infrastructure vanished overnight, but the black market infrastructure remained perfectly intact.

The people who thrived in this environment weren't just street thugs; they were highly intelligent opportunists, corrupt state officials, and economists (like Semion Mogilevich) who deeply understood supply chains, international currency conversion, and the art of the bribe. They moved seamlessly from the Soviet shadow economy into the multi-billion-dollar global syndicates of the 1990s.

i mean, i didnt swallow it, but i sure put it in my mouth and chewed it

the reason why was, i thought it was a browny, because i was a dumbass homeless person, and i was hallucinating,

and it was broad daylight but i was hungry,

and i was going through the trash for food, and i saw it in the bottom of a cup and i thought it was like brownie bites

so i tossed it down

and gave it a chew

but it was dog shit

and i learned some horrible things that i wished i hadnt

oh and it had glass in it, like broken glass, cause i guess the dog had eaten some broken glass

but like, the horrible thing was,

it didnt taste as bad as it smells; it was a mild enough flavor on the inside that it took a few seconds to realize what it was

it almost kindof tasted like food of some kind

ya know it fooled me for like one second until i tasted the glass

anyway it turns out, that shit actually tastes more like the original food than you think, on the inside,

and that bad shit smell is mostly on the outside just from bacteria

i wish i didnt know that

and now ive told you that, because you downvoted my last post 8 times

and this is your punishment

this is your consequence

dont do it again i have worse stories

much worse

(eh i dunno; that ones pretty bad)

maybe thats my worst but you got it

dumbasses

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47549057

Let's take a look at Targeted Victory, the company that has raped us:

If their bots are Terminators, think of these as their older, T-800 models: https://www.facebook.com/groups/870032844629352 (every single poster on that page, every single one of them, is a Targeted Victory bot. Do you see how every single post has a funny code at the top? This was an older, anti-bot-algorithm-beating scheme. It still runs. Why don't they undo it, and delete all this, now that they have better AI-powered bots, that beat the anti-bot-algos on their own? Because, in their minds, suddenly deleting this, or suddenly stopping the output of these long-running models, would give away the scam more noticeably that leaving it up. "Maybe all these posters are real people who just like typing the same anti-anti-bot-algo-beating codes into the top of all their posts for no reason". I'm serious. )

These, on the other hand, are their new T-1000 models: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqPe8SN0VZ0 (This is a fake AI podcaster, produced by Targeted Victory, and every single viewer/commenter is one of their bots, promoting what I call their "make America racist program", on behalf of their clients. I wonder which clients ordered this?

They also do Spencer the same way: these videos are theirs and all these commenters/viewers are their bots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmy0v8JyEK0

They've also put out fake polling for him: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fact-check-fake-emerson-poll-030345660.html

If you join every MAGA group here on facebook, you'll see them hard at work every day. Almost all the commenters, meme posts, and the groups themselves, are theirs.

Their office is in Virginia. They're publicly listed; it's just that no one knows what they do.

This office, and this company, deserves its own dedicated protest force against it (think No Kings/50501 style), and, this practice deserves its own new legislation banning this behavior outright, and requiring all social media companies to have measures in place against it. Furthermore I would have all the current employees, owners, and clients publicly disclosed and prosecuted under new increased-penalty laws, and I would have their servers and client lists confiscated and exposed to the world.

These are the same people that covered up Trump's election theft in 2024 to begin with, by making it look like MAGA was genuniely that popular with Americans, so that everyone was shocked by his win (I remember Harris leading the polls), but no one questioned it (they all said, well, you sure could see what looked like tons of pro-Trump commenters online... a very simple trick, and now a very embarrassing and costly one if exposed).

Get ready to perform mass corrective maneuvers.

Is this like the Civil War? How 'bout the American Revolution?

Nope. This is like the French Revolution. Or the Russian.

Blame it all on Targeted Victory... (they're the biggest of these groups but there's actually several of them in America, and some in Russia, all contributing to the American onslaught in the same manner. They all deserve their own protest/confiscation/prosecution. The other American companies doing this are:

Targeted Victory: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314

i360: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

Axiom Strategies: 1251 NW Briarcliff Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116

Vici Media Group: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

Mercury Public Affairs: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017

#MAGA #Trump

Let's take a look at Targeted Victory, the company that has raped us:

If their bots are Terminators, think of these as their older, T-800 models: https://www.facebook.com/groups/870032844629352 (every single poster on that page, every single one of them, is a Targeted Victory bot. Do you see how every single post has a funny code at the top? This was an older, anti-bot-algorithm-beating scheme. It still runs. Why don't they undo it, and delete all this, now that they have better AI-powered bots, that beat the anti-bot-algos on their own? Because, in their minds, suddenly deleting this, or suddenly stopping the output of these long-running models, would give away the scam more noticeably that leaving it up. "Maybe all these posters are real people who just like typing the same anti-anti-bot-algo-beating codes into the top of all their posts for no reason". I'm serious. )

These, on the other hand, are their new T-1000 models: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqPe8SN0VZ0 (This is a fake AI podcaster, produced by Targeted Victory, and every single viewer/commenter is one of their bots, promoting what I call their "make America racist program", on behalf of their clients. I wonder which clients ordered this?

They also do Spencer the same way: these videos are theirs and all these commenters/viewers are their bots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmy0v8JyEK0

They've also put out fake polling for him: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fact-check-fake-emerson-poll-030345660.html

If you join every MAGA group here on facebook, you'll see them hard at work every day. Almost all the commenters, meme posts, and the groups themselves, are theirs.

Their office is in Virginia. They're publicly listed; it's just that no one knows what they do.

This office, and this company, deserves its own dedicated protest force against it (think No Kings/50501 style), and, this practice deserves its own new legislation banning this behavior outright, and requiring all social media companies to have measures in place against it. Furthermore I would have all the current employees, owners, and clients publicly disclosed and prosecuted under new increased-penalty laws, and I would have their servers and client lists confiscated and exposed to the world.

These are the same people that covered up Trump's election theft in 2024 to begin with, by making it look like MAGA was genuniely that popular with Americans, so that everyone was shocked by his win (I remember Harris leading the polls), but no one questioned it (they all said, well, you sure could see what looked like tons of pro-Trump commenters online... a very simple trick, and now a very embarrassing and costly one if exposed).

Get ready to perform mass corrective maneuvers.

Is this like the Civil War? How 'bout the American Revolution?

Nope. This is like the French Revolution. Or the Russian.

Blame it all on Targeted Victory... (they're the biggest of these groups but there's actually several of them in America, and some in Russia, all contributing to the American onslaught in the same manner. They all deserve their own protest/confiscation/prosecution. The other American companies doing this are:

Targeted Victory: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314

i360: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

Axiom Strategies: 1251 NW Briarcliff Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116

Vici Media Group: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

Mercury Public Affairs: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017

#MAGA #Trump

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47420835

READ- SHARE- PROTEST- MARCH- TELL YOUR FRIENDS- THIS IS WHERE THE CLEANUP BEGINS- FIND THESE PLACES- STAND OUTSIDE- SHUT THEM DOWN- SPREAD THE NEWS-

Domestic U.S. Operations: Do they run out of D.C. PACs?

If you are looking for physical "farms" of computers or human trolls operating inside Washington, D.C. Political Action Committees (PACs), you won't find them there. D.C. PAC offices are primarily white-collar spaces for lawyers, strategists, and fundraisers.

Instead, domestic astroturfing (fake grassroots) and automated amplification are heavily outsourced through a decentralized network:

The "Adfarm" and Digital Vendor Model

PACs do not build bot software in-house. They hire digital consulting firms, public relations agencies, and data analytics vendors. These vendors are scattered across the country—frequently in tech hubs like Austin, Texas, parts of Florida, and Northern Virginia (just outside D.C.).

Outsource to Independent Contractors

When domestic campaigns utilize large-scale text-blasting, coordinated comment amplification, or meme-propagation networks, they typically use decentralized networks of paid contractors. Rather than a single physical building, these are often "click farms" or network clusters of remote workers using commercial engagement tools (like peer-to-peer texting platforms and social media management dashboards) to coordinate message delivery at scale.

The Legal Shield of "Data Services"

When PACs file their mandatory financial disclosures with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), expenditures for these operations are hidden under broad, legal line items like:

• "Digital Consulting"
• "Data Analytics Services"
• "Online Advertising Production"

This makes it incredibly difficult to trace exactly how much money flows from a specific PAC into automated or semi-automated social media manipulation.

---

Summary of the Interface

The intersection of these two forces isn't a physical meeting in a D.C. basement; it is an algorithmic alignment.

Russia's state-backed centers (operating from Moscow/St. Petersburg via masked U.S. servers) watch what domestic U.S. political actors, PACs, and influencers are posting. When a divisive domestic narrative gains traction, Russian bot networks immediately use generative AI to clone, amplify, and weaponize that exact topic to maximize domestic polarization.

---

When looking at the domestic digital political pipeline, the term "bot software" can sometimes obscure how modern American political campaigns actually manipulate social media.

Domestic vendors rarely use completely automated ghost accounts (like the Russian state-backed farms). Instead, they specialize in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and algorithmic amplification. They build and rent proprietary databases, use peer-to-peer (P2P) mass communication tech, deploy generative AI scripts for comment sections, and coordinate "astroturf" (fake grassroots) campaigns where real people or highly curated semi-automated personas sync their messaging simultaneously.

Because FEC disclosures only require tracking the primary entity paid, a handful of massive firms control the vast majority of the right-of-center digital infrastructure.

---

1. The Giants: Largest Right-of-Center Digital & Data Vendors

Targeted Victory

• What they do: By far the largest and most influential digital agency for the Republican party. They handle massive email/SMS marketing infrastructure, targeted digital advertising, and online audience mobilization. They essentially manage the digital engine for the NRSC, NRCC, and hundreds of national campaigns.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Located in Northern Virginia, just across the river from Washington, D.C.)

i360 (A subsidiary of Koch Industries / Stand Together)

• What they do: The premier data-analytics power broker for conservative organizations and Super PACs (like Americans for Prosperity). They maintain a proprietary database tracking over 250 million U.S. consumers and voters, tracking thousands of data points per person. Their technology powers predictive modeling used by digital vendors to feed targeted content and programmatic ad networks.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201 (Northern Virginia)

Axiom Strategies

• What they do: The largest political consulting conglomerate on the right. While they handle full campaign operations, their digital arms (such as Arrington Horizon and Cannon Research) execute highly aggressive online target marketing, data analysis, and peer-to-peer amplification programs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 1251 NW Briarcliff完成 Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116 (Though they maintain major satellite hubs in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.)

---

2. The Tech Hub Ecosystem: Austin, Texas

Austin hosts several digital consulting firms that focus heavily on the mechanical side of digital engagement—building custom web scraping tools, deploying mass SMS platforms, and programmatic ad targeting.

Vici Media Group

• What they do: A prominent right-of-center digital agency specializing in grassroots activation, digital ad targeting, and online persuasion campaigns for conservative organizations, political committees, and PACs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

---

3. The Closest Major Enterprise to Los Angeles, California

Because California is heavily blue, major right-of-center digital powerhouses do not maintain massive physical headquarters within LA proper. Instead, they operate out of bipartisan megallcs with local offices, or they base themselves out of the more conservative Orange County/San Diego corridor.

The most prominent equivalent firm operating a physical office near Los Angeles is:

Mercury Public Affairs (Los Angeles Office)

• What they do: Mercury is a massive, high-stakes public affairs and political consulting firm. While technically bipartisan, it houses prominent senior Republican strategists, digital directors, and PAC advisors. They excel at "grassroots coalition building" and digital advocacy, which involves using digital media networks to manufacture public pressure and shape online narratives for corporate clients and political groups.
• Los Angeles Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Located in Downtown LA)

The Digital Blueprint: How They Mask Operations

If you walked into Mercury's downtown LA office or Targeted Victory's Virginia office, you wouldn't see server racks humming with dummy social media accounts. The operation is entirely white-collar.

Instead, the actual "spam" infrastructure—the code that triggers peer-to-peer text messages, the software that buys micro-targeted programmatic banner ads, or the APIs that auto-post coordinated graphics—is cloud-hosted via standard corporate cloud infrastructure (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). The PAC writes a check to a firm like Targeted Victory for "Digital Consulting," and that firm uses its cloud tools to deploy the digital wave, completely shielding the mechanics from public view.

...the worst part is, this is used also to hack elections- like 2024, maybe like upcoming los angeles mayor and california governor- you just hack the election, and everyone thinks you really won it, if you covered social media with spam, making it look like your party is more popular than it is. THIS ISNT FREE SPEECH- THIS IS MANIPULATION- if youve ever protested anything before, get people together, stand in front of these buildings.

#MAGA #spencerpratt #californiapost #NewYorkPost #FraudAlert #propaganda #FBI #Trump #putin #russia #politicalmanipulation #electionfraud #coverup #usa #democracy #democrat #left #blue #red #donttreadonus

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47420835

READ- SHARE- PROTEST- MARCH- TELL YOUR FRIENDS- THIS IS WHERE THE CLEANUP BEGINS- FIND THESE PLACES- STAND OUTSIDE- SHUT THEM DOWN- SPREAD THE NEWS-

Domestic U.S. Operations: Do they run out of D.C. PACs?

If you are looking for physical "farms" of computers or human trolls operating inside Washington, D.C. Political Action Committees (PACs), you won't find them there. D.C. PAC offices are primarily white-collar spaces for lawyers, strategists, and fundraisers.

Instead, domestic astroturfing (fake grassroots) and automated amplification are heavily outsourced through a decentralized network:

The "Adfarm" and Digital Vendor Model

PACs do not build bot software in-house. They hire digital consulting firms, public relations agencies, and data analytics vendors. These vendors are scattered across the country—frequently in tech hubs like Austin, Texas, parts of Florida, and Northern Virginia (just outside D.C.).

Outsource to Independent Contractors

When domestic campaigns utilize large-scale text-blasting, coordinated comment amplification, or meme-propagation networks, they typically use decentralized networks of paid contractors. Rather than a single physical building, these are often "click farms" or network clusters of remote workers using commercial engagement tools (like peer-to-peer texting platforms and social media management dashboards) to coordinate message delivery at scale.

The Legal Shield of "Data Services"

When PACs file their mandatory financial disclosures with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), expenditures for these operations are hidden under broad, legal line items like:

• "Digital Consulting"
• "Data Analytics Services"
• "Online Advertising Production"

This makes it incredibly difficult to trace exactly how much money flows from a specific PAC into automated or semi-automated social media manipulation.

---

Summary of the Interface

The intersection of these two forces isn't a physical meeting in a D.C. basement; it is an algorithmic alignment.

Russia's state-backed centers (operating from Moscow/St. Petersburg via masked U.S. servers) watch what domestic U.S. political actors, PACs, and influencers are posting. When a divisive domestic narrative gains traction, Russian bot networks immediately use generative AI to clone, amplify, and weaponize that exact topic to maximize domestic polarization.

---

When looking at the domestic digital political pipeline, the term "bot software" can sometimes obscure how modern American political campaigns actually manipulate social media.

Domestic vendors rarely use completely automated ghost accounts (like the Russian state-backed farms). Instead, they specialize in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and algorithmic amplification. They build and rent proprietary databases, use peer-to-peer (P2P) mass communication tech, deploy generative AI scripts for comment sections, and coordinate "astroturf" (fake grassroots) campaigns where real people or highly curated semi-automated personas sync their messaging simultaneously.

Because FEC disclosures only require tracking the primary entity paid, a handful of massive firms control the vast majority of the right-of-center digital infrastructure.

---

1. The Giants: Largest Right-of-Center Digital & Data Vendors

Targeted Victory

• What they do: By far the largest and most influential digital agency for the Republican party. They handle massive email/SMS marketing infrastructure, targeted digital advertising, and online audience mobilization. They essentially manage the digital engine for the NRSC, NRCC, and hundreds of national campaigns.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Located in Northern Virginia, just across the river from Washington, D.C.)

i360 (A subsidiary of Koch Industries / Stand Together)

• What they do: The premier data-analytics power broker for conservative organizations and Super PACs (like Americans for Prosperity). They maintain a proprietary database tracking over 250 million U.S. consumers and voters, tracking thousands of data points per person. Their technology powers predictive modeling used by digital vendors to feed targeted content and programmatic ad networks.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201 (Northern Virginia)

Axiom Strategies

• What they do: The largest political consulting conglomerate on the right. While they handle full campaign operations, their digital arms (such as Arrington Horizon and Cannon Research) execute highly aggressive online target marketing, data analysis, and peer-to-peer amplification programs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 1251 NW Briarcliff完成 Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116 (Though they maintain major satellite hubs in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.)

---

2. The Tech Hub Ecosystem: Austin, Texas

Austin hosts several digital consulting firms that focus heavily on the mechanical side of digital engagement—building custom web scraping tools, deploying mass SMS platforms, and programmatic ad targeting.

Vici Media Group

• What they do: A prominent right-of-center digital agency specializing in grassroots activation, digital ad targeting, and online persuasion campaigns for conservative organizations, political committees, and PACs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

---

3. The Closest Major Enterprise to Los Angeles, California

Because California is heavily blue, major right-of-center digital powerhouses do not maintain massive physical headquarters within LA proper. Instead, they operate out of bipartisan megallcs with local offices, or they base themselves out of the more conservative Orange County/San Diego corridor.

The most prominent equivalent firm operating a physical office near Los Angeles is:

Mercury Public Affairs (Los Angeles Office)

• What they do: Mercury is a massive, high-stakes public affairs and political consulting firm. While technically bipartisan, it houses prominent senior Republican strategists, digital directors, and PAC advisors. They excel at "grassroots coalition building" and digital advocacy, which involves using digital media networks to manufacture public pressure and shape online narratives for corporate clients and political groups.
• Los Angeles Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Located in Downtown LA)

The Digital Blueprint: How They Mask Operations

If you walked into Mercury's downtown LA office or Targeted Victory's Virginia office, you wouldn't see server racks humming with dummy social media accounts. The operation is entirely white-collar.

Instead, the actual "spam" infrastructure—the code that triggers peer-to-peer text messages, the software that buys micro-targeted programmatic banner ads, or the APIs that auto-post coordinated graphics—is cloud-hosted via standard corporate cloud infrastructure (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). The PAC writes a check to a firm like Targeted Victory for "Digital Consulting," and that firm uses its cloud tools to deploy the digital wave, completely shielding the mechanics from public view.

...the worst part is, this is used also to hack elections- like 2024, maybe like upcoming los angeles mayor and california governor- you just hack the election, and everyone thinks you really won it, if you covered social media with spam, making it look like your party is more popular than it is. THIS ISNT FREE SPEECH- THIS IS MANIPULATION- if youve ever protested anything before, get people together, stand in front of these buildings.

#MAGA #spencerpratt #californiapost #NewYorkPost #FraudAlert #propaganda #FBI #Trump #putin #russia #politicalmanipulation #electionfraud #coverup #usa #democracy #democrat #left #blue #red #donttreadonus

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47420835

READ- SHARE- PROTEST- MARCH- TELL YOUR FRIENDS- THIS IS WHERE THE CLEANUP BEGINS- FIND THESE PLACES- STAND OUTSIDE- SHUT THEM DOWN- SPREAD THE NEWS-

Domestic U.S. Operations: Do they run out of D.C. PACs?

If you are looking for physical "farms" of computers or human trolls operating inside Washington, D.C. Political Action Committees (PACs), you won't find them there. D.C. PAC offices are primarily white-collar spaces for lawyers, strategists, and fundraisers.

Instead, domestic astroturfing (fake grassroots) and automated amplification are heavily outsourced through a decentralized network:

The "Adfarm" and Digital Vendor Model

PACs do not build bot software in-house. They hire digital consulting firms, public relations agencies, and data analytics vendors. These vendors are scattered across the country—frequently in tech hubs like Austin, Texas, parts of Florida, and Northern Virginia (just outside D.C.).

Outsource to Independent Contractors

When domestic campaigns utilize large-scale text-blasting, coordinated comment amplification, or meme-propagation networks, they typically use decentralized networks of paid contractors. Rather than a single physical building, these are often "click farms" or network clusters of remote workers using commercial engagement tools (like peer-to-peer texting platforms and social media management dashboards) to coordinate message delivery at scale.

The Legal Shield of "Data Services"

When PACs file their mandatory financial disclosures with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), expenditures for these operations are hidden under broad, legal line items like:

• "Digital Consulting"
• "Data Analytics Services"
• "Online Advertising Production"

This makes it incredibly difficult to trace exactly how much money flows from a specific PAC into automated or semi-automated social media manipulation.

---

Summary of the Interface

The intersection of these two forces isn't a physical meeting in a D.C. basement; it is an algorithmic alignment.

Russia's state-backed centers (operating from Moscow/St. Petersburg via masked U.S. servers) watch what domestic U.S. political actors, PACs, and influencers are posting. When a divisive domestic narrative gains traction, Russian bot networks immediately use generative AI to clone, amplify, and weaponize that exact topic to maximize domestic polarization.

---

When looking at the domestic digital political pipeline, the term "bot software" can sometimes obscure how modern American political campaigns actually manipulate social media.

Domestic vendors rarely use completely automated ghost accounts (like the Russian state-backed farms). Instead, they specialize in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and algorithmic amplification. They build and rent proprietary databases, use peer-to-peer (P2P) mass communication tech, deploy generative AI scripts for comment sections, and coordinate "astroturf" (fake grassroots) campaigns where real people or highly curated semi-automated personas sync their messaging simultaneously.

Because FEC disclosures only require tracking the primary entity paid, a handful of massive firms control the vast majority of the right-of-center digital infrastructure.

---

1. The Giants: Largest Right-of-Center Digital & Data Vendors

Targeted Victory

• What they do: By far the largest and most influential digital agency for the Republican party. They handle massive email/SMS marketing infrastructure, targeted digital advertising, and online audience mobilization. They essentially manage the digital engine for the NRSC, NRCC, and hundreds of national campaigns.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Located in Northern Virginia, just across the river from Washington, D.C.)

i360 (A subsidiary of Koch Industries / Stand Together)

• What they do: The premier data-analytics power broker for conservative organizations and Super PACs (like Americans for Prosperity). They maintain a proprietary database tracking over 250 million U.S. consumers and voters, tracking thousands of data points per person. Their technology powers predictive modeling used by digital vendors to feed targeted content and programmatic ad networks.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201 (Northern Virginia)

Axiom Strategies

• What they do: The largest political consulting conglomerate on the right. While they handle full campaign operations, their digital arms (such as Arrington Horizon and Cannon Research) execute highly aggressive online target marketing, data analysis, and peer-to-peer amplification programs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 1251 NW Briarcliff完成 Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116 (Though they maintain major satellite hubs in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.)

---

2. The Tech Hub Ecosystem: Austin, Texas

Austin hosts several digital consulting firms that focus heavily on the mechanical side of digital engagement—building custom web scraping tools, deploying mass SMS platforms, and programmatic ad targeting.

Vici Media Group

• What they do: A prominent right-of-center digital agency specializing in grassroots activation, digital ad targeting, and online persuasion campaigns for conservative organizations, political committees, and PACs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

---

3. The Closest Major Enterprise to Los Angeles, California

Because California is heavily blue, major right-of-center digital powerhouses do not maintain massive physical headquarters within LA proper. Instead, they operate out of bipartisan megallcs with local offices, or they base themselves out of the more conservative Orange County/San Diego corridor.

The most prominent equivalent firm operating a physical office near Los Angeles is:

Mercury Public Affairs (Los Angeles Office)

• What they do: Mercury is a massive, high-stakes public affairs and political consulting firm. While technically bipartisan, it houses prominent senior Republican strategists, digital directors, and PAC advisors. They excel at "grassroots coalition building" and digital advocacy, which involves using digital media networks to manufacture public pressure and shape online narratives for corporate clients and political groups.
• Los Angeles Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Located in Downtown LA)

The Digital Blueprint: How They Mask Operations

If you walked into Mercury's downtown LA office or Targeted Victory's Virginia office, you wouldn't see server racks humming with dummy social media accounts. The operation is entirely white-collar.

Instead, the actual "spam" infrastructure—the code that triggers peer-to-peer text messages, the software that buys micro-targeted programmatic banner ads, or the APIs that auto-post coordinated graphics—is cloud-hosted via standard corporate cloud infrastructure (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). The PAC writes a check to a firm like Targeted Victory for "Digital Consulting," and that firm uses its cloud tools to deploy the digital wave, completely shielding the mechanics from public view.

...the worst part is, this is used also to hack elections- like 2024, maybe like upcoming los angeles mayor and california governor- you just hack the election, and everyone thinks you really won it, if you covered social media with spam, making it look like your party is more popular than it is. THIS ISNT FREE SPEECH- THIS IS MANIPULATION- if youve ever protested anything before, get people together, stand in front of these buildings.

#MAGA #spencerpratt #californiapost #NewYorkPost #FraudAlert #propaganda #FBI #Trump #putin #russia #politicalmanipulation #electionfraud #coverup #usa #democracy #democrat #left #blue #red #donttreadonus

READ- SHARE- PROTEST- MARCH- TELL YOUR FRIENDS- THIS IS WHERE THE CLEANUP BEGINS- FIND THESE PLACES- STAND OUTSIDE- SHUT THEM DOWN- SPREAD THE NEWS-

Domestic U.S. Operations: Do they run out of D.C. PACs?

If you are looking for physical "farms" of computers or human trolls operating inside Washington, D.C. Political Action Committees (PACs), you won't find them there. D.C. PAC offices are primarily white-collar spaces for lawyers, strategists, and fundraisers.

Instead, domestic astroturfing (fake grassroots) and automated amplification are heavily outsourced through a decentralized network:

The "Adfarm" and Digital Vendor Model

PACs do not build bot software in-house. They hire digital consulting firms, public relations agencies, and data analytics vendors. These vendors are scattered across the country—frequently in tech hubs like Austin, Texas, parts of Florida, and Northern Virginia (just outside D.C.).

Outsource to Independent Contractors

When domestic campaigns utilize large-scale text-blasting, coordinated comment amplification, or meme-propagation networks, they typically use decentralized networks of paid contractors. Rather than a single physical building, these are often "click farms" or network clusters of remote workers using commercial engagement tools (like peer-to-peer texting platforms and social media management dashboards) to coordinate message delivery at scale.

The Legal Shield of "Data Services"

When PACs file their mandatory financial disclosures with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), expenditures for these operations are hidden under broad, legal line items like:

• "Digital Consulting"
• "Data Analytics Services"
• "Online Advertising Production"

This makes it incredibly difficult to trace exactly how much money flows from a specific PAC into automated or semi-automated social media manipulation.

---

Summary of the Interface

The intersection of these two forces isn't a physical meeting in a D.C. basement; it is an algorithmic alignment.

Russia's state-backed centers (operating from Moscow/St. Petersburg via masked U.S. servers) watch what domestic U.S. political actors, PACs, and influencers are posting. When a divisive domestic narrative gains traction, Russian bot networks immediately use generative AI to clone, amplify, and weaponize that exact topic to maximize domestic polarization.

---

When looking at the domestic digital political pipeline, the term "bot software" can sometimes obscure how modern American political campaigns actually manipulate social media.

Domestic vendors rarely use completely automated ghost accounts (like the Russian state-backed farms). Instead, they specialize in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and algorithmic amplification. They build and rent proprietary databases, use peer-to-peer (P2P) mass communication tech, deploy generative AI scripts for comment sections, and coordinate "astroturf" (fake grassroots) campaigns where real people or highly curated semi-automated personas sync their messaging simultaneously.

Because FEC disclosures only require tracking the primary entity paid, a handful of massive firms control the vast majority of the right-of-center digital infrastructure.

---

1. The Giants: Largest Right-of-Center Digital & Data Vendors

Targeted Victory

• What they do: By far the largest and most influential digital agency for the Republican party. They handle massive email/SMS marketing infrastructure, targeted digital advertising, and online audience mobilization. They essentially manage the digital engine for the NRSC, NRCC, and hundreds of national campaigns.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Located in Northern Virginia, just across the river from Washington, D.C.)

i360 (A subsidiary of Koch Industries / Stand Together)

• What they do: The premier data-analytics power broker for conservative organizations and Super PACs (like Americans for Prosperity). They maintain a proprietary database tracking over 250 million U.S. consumers and voters, tracking thousands of data points per person. Their technology powers predictive modeling used by digital vendors to feed targeted content and programmatic ad networks.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201 (Northern Virginia)

Axiom Strategies

• What they do: The largest political consulting conglomerate on the right. While they handle full campaign operations, their digital arms (such as Arrington Horizon and Cannon Research) execute highly aggressive online target marketing, data analysis, and peer-to-peer amplification programs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 1251 NW Briarcliff完成 Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116 (Though they maintain major satellite hubs in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.)

---

2. The Tech Hub Ecosystem: Austin, Texas

Austin hosts several digital consulting firms that focus heavily on the mechanical side of digital engagement—building custom web scraping tools, deploying mass SMS platforms, and programmatic ad targeting.

Vici Media Group

• What they do: A prominent right-of-center digital agency specializing in grassroots activation, digital ad targeting, and online persuasion campaigns for conservative organizations, political committees, and PACs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

---

3. The Closest Major Enterprise to Los Angeles, California

Because California is heavily blue, major right-of-center digital powerhouses do not maintain massive physical headquarters within LA proper. Instead, they operate out of bipartisan megallcs with local offices, or they base themselves out of the more conservative Orange County/San Diego corridor.

The most prominent equivalent firm operating a physical office near Los Angeles is:

Mercury Public Affairs (Los Angeles Office)

• What they do: Mercury is a massive, high-stakes public affairs and political consulting firm. While technically bipartisan, it houses prominent senior Republican strategists, digital directors, and PAC advisors. They excel at "grassroots coalition building" and digital advocacy, which involves using digital media networks to manufacture public pressure and shape online narratives for corporate clients and political groups.
• Los Angeles Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Located in Downtown LA)

The Digital Blueprint: How They Mask Operations

If you walked into Mercury's downtown LA office or Targeted Victory's Virginia office, you wouldn't see server racks humming with dummy social media accounts. The operation is entirely white-collar.

Instead, the actual "spam" infrastructure—the code that triggers peer-to-peer text messages, the software that buys micro-targeted programmatic banner ads, or the APIs that auto-post coordinated graphics—is cloud-hosted via standard corporate cloud infrastructure (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). The PAC writes a check to a firm like Targeted Victory for "Digital Consulting," and that firm uses its cloud tools to deploy the digital wave, completely shielding the mechanics from public view.

...the worst part is, this is used also to hack elections- like 2024, maybe like upcoming los angeles mayor and california governor- you just hack the election, and everyone thinks you really won it, if you covered social media with spam, making it look like your party is more popular than it is. THIS ISNT FREE SPEECH- THIS IS MANIPULATION- if youve ever protested anything before, get people together, stand in front of these buildings.

#MAGA #spencerpratt #californiapost #NewYorkPost #FraudAlert #propaganda #FBI #Trump #putin #russia #politicalmanipulation #electionfraud #coverup #usa #democracy #democrat #left #blue #red #donttreadonus