The smallest possible rectangle board with all 8 numbers and a blank spot (custom-made)
6x4 is not possible (evidence left as exercise for the reader) Website used
Layout alt text: 0113M 24M5M MMM6M M8M7M MMMMM
6x4 is not possible (evidence left as exercise for the reader) Website used
Layout alt text: 0113M 24M5M MMM6M M8M7M MMMMM
I'm in no way affiliated, just a minesweeper fan
https://store.steampowered.com/app/982220/Globesweeper/Open linkView original on lemmy.world2 mines left, and this is supposed to be No-guess.
However, it seems that there can be two answers to this -
(A) The top square of the top pair and the top square of the bottom pair, can both be mines.
(B) The bottom square of the top pair and the bottom square of the bottom pair, can both be mines.
But then this is not really guess free, is it ?
(Note - I did go with option (A), and it proved to be right. But my original question still stands).
What am I missing ?
This is guess-free, and 14 mines left, all under those uncovered squares.
Any thoughts on how to proceed ?
EDIT - never mind. Tried brute force with the hope that the path I choose would be the right one - and lost.
But there's always a next time mine, lol.
And it was indeed heartening to see the Minesweeper community in Lemmy is not dead.
This was a rare moment where I actually had to think to find it. Can you?
Screenshot is from a solver I found online because I didn't think to take a screenshot until I already opened the safe square.
Screenshot from Antimine on Android. It's supposed to not require any guesses, but I'm totally stuck. I'm probably missing something simple, so more eyes on it should help... Anyone?
I probably gave myself this bad habit of flagging and chording from the very beginning when I started playing minesweeeper - and got used to it.
But I also heard that giving up flagging may take a while to get used to, but it may also make you faster in the long run.
I mean, I get it - if you do not flag, you are basically avoiding hitting the squares you do not need to hit, and in turn reducing the number of clicks.
I did try that a couple of times - but I found that I need to think a lot more when playing without flagging, and the "useful" patterns (1-2-1, 1-2-2-1 and stuff like those) are not really useful there.
Thoughts?
2.85 % chance of not hitting a mine
This basically lets you play together on an infinite minesweeper board. I've played it a few years ago and it's cool to see it's still up.
These calculators allow you to input a board and automatically calculate the probabilities of cells being mines or safe, or even the probability of winning.
In short, ZiNi is a number, that tries to find the minimum amount of clicks needed to solve a specific board with allowed use of flags and chords. ZiNi calculators allow you to input a board and attempt to find its ZiNi value.