Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.blahaj.zone

4 replies

lemmy.world

I understand what you mean, but they couldn't resist the "end of the universe as we know it" trope. That was totally unnecessary in my opinion.

5
Woosterreply
startrek.website

In Prodigy’s defense, they waited the equivalent of two seasons to play that card, and the execution was IMO, better than what we saw in Picard and Discovery.

6
EarMasterreply
lemmy.world

That's true, but especially for a show aimed at kids the survival or wellbeing of the crew would have been more than enough. There was absolutely no reason at all to bring up a plan to destroy the whole Starfleet...

1

The narrative problem with the kids arriving in Federation territory in a stolen ship was that the Protostar would be impounded and the kids would be sent packing.

They needed a narrative reason to give the kids a chance to command the Protostar and have their own adventures, which means dragging out returning it to Starfleet. But rather than resorting to stalling tactics, they opted to have the kids fight to keep it out of their hands, and for good reason.

With Picard and Discovery, I felt more like that trope was used because the writers had no better ideas on how to keep the stakes high.

With Prodigy, I felt that the stakes were made essential to its premise.

4

You reached the end

Think I worked out why I enjoyed Prodigy season 1 | Spyke