Spyke
lemmy.world

So the U.S. military has made the assessment that climate change is the single greatest threat to U.S. national security in the history if the U.S., and they've also simultaneously shrugged and said, nah man, we aren't going to do anything about it.. do I have that right?

68

Don't be silly. I'm sure the U.S. military has drawn up several contingency plans to massacre climate migrants.

32
lemmings.world

If the rhetoric is that Santa delivers coal to bad kids then why are we subsidizing that industry?

8
lemmy.ml

the US military runs on fossil fuel, can't disempower the military

8
silence7reply
slrpnk.net

The bulk of their operations are logistics, which can be decarbonized. And military use isn't generally subsidized in the usual sense of that word.

12
lntlreply

military still has to buy it. i mean the infrastructure to produce oil has to be there and in good working order. subsidized by the public as required.

military will only decarbonize if it's a strategic advantage that they understand. i haven't heard any talk of them doing that except in out in the outer rim where it's difficult to ship fuel.

3

typical rug-pulling from the US's part. Otherwise how could they have become the first world superpower smh

4

You reached the end

US Opts Out of Dutch Plan to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies at COP28 | Spyke