Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

25 replies

no need. they're still making tons off of v1's dlc and microtransactions.

16
lugal
sopuli.xyz

While we're at it: Why is there no planet B? Don't just tell me there isn't! If the earth was so great, the market would provide for more than 1 planet

10

Because Society 1 just came out not long ago, and they're gonna milk that life as a service model for all it's worth.

6
lemmy.world

I don't want to see society 2. There will be a nasty reboot. It will be painful, might not even come back up.

4
skeeter_davereply
sh.itjust.works

I'm sure citizens of multiple powers throughout history said the same thing, yet here we are.

1

We're already at society 84,659. It's not very different than society 84,614 though.

4
lemmy.world

This is Society 2. Society 1 was the Feudalism release, Society 2 is the Capitalist Democracy release, Society 3 looks like it might be Socialist Democracy as that's the way the game's content has been moving but there's lots of players that preferred the Feudalism release and want more of that.

3
MxM111
kbin.social

Considering AI development, please stay tuned. So, I doubt that we will see โ€œplanet of apesโ€ as โ€œsociety 2โ€. Sorry, monkey. However, there is still โ€œsociety 3โ€ possible, depending on our AI overlords. So, as I said, stay tuned.

2

I am not optimistic at simians surviving a war of humanity against machines. Frankly, I donโ€™t think they will survive just the presence of humans.

1
nevial
discuss.tchncs.de

This only makes sense if we're talking about movies. If we're talking about software (as the Lemmy title suggests) the question in itself doesn't make sense because only something that needs improvement needs an update

2

If society is so great, as you claim, why would there be a 2.0?

1

You reached the end