Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

8 replies

I tried both and I feel like Wildlands is better. The world is very alive and expansive, plus the movement feels better. Something feels very clunky about breakpoint's movement. Oh, and I enjoyed Wildlands' primary enemies quite a bit more than Breakpoint. Wildlands does a good job of letting you SEE just how depraved the Sicarios are and their effects on the world.

10

Another vote for wildlands. I just couldn’t get into breakpoint as much as I did wildlands.

5

Wildlands is still a great game. It is set in 2019 Bolivia, you work to take down cartels one region at a time. It's fun both singleplayer and co-op for up to 4 players.

Breakpoint is set on some semi-futuristic Elon Musk type fantasy technology island with drones driving and flying around. The map itself is large and varied, it seems like a South Pacific type environment. Breakpoint initially did a lot of things worse than Wildlands, such as not having AI squadmates and needing to level up your weapons. But since then the game has been updated with a lot of options to fix almost everything, and even add a lot more content. It's a lot to get used to but ultimately still a lot of fun.

But first play Wildlands, it is fun right away, and more realistic overall.

4
lemmy.world

I really wish they had put out a 60fps patch for Wildlands.

I actually like them both, honestly. They are different games, and Breakpoint by the end (when I started playing it) really wasn’t that bad. The setting was maybe just kind of un-inspired.

Overall Wildlands is probably the better game, for sure, though.

2

Decided to come back to this thread and check on it. Seems Wildlands is the clear winner XD

1

You reached the end