Spyke
lemmy.world

Cool leave all the executive and judicial positions for the children of the rich. They'll make ethical decisions that benefit everyone

116

That, and they also keep changing it. When too many middle class people make good many with trades, they call it inflation and engineer a recession that depresses those wages.

When too many middle class people are getting higher education, they raise tuition and burden us with debt.

The real answer is: do what you love, if you're good at it and if it provides objective value to society.

And all together, we must have middle class solidarity to reign in the power the elites have over us and make sure we own and control the wealth and housing stock, while they pay high taxes and not us.

If we don't demand our share of the pie, we will end up with scraps and our children will end up with even less.

44
slrpnk.net

That's where the dictatorship of the people comes in.

Frankly, this is where I borrow a page from Mao's Little Red Book. If you had the sort of education that only wealth and privilege can grant you, you have no right to hold political power.

-28

Your words are self-defeating. A dictatorship is based on privilege for the few.

Also: Your only solution for classism is put some power concentration on it?

One Worker to rule them all, One Worker to find them, One Worker to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

24
reddthat.com

Few things here. Apprenticeships are hard to come by. You have to know someone or be in the right family already.

Second, university is a universal education. You can do almost anything afterwards. Gradschool is where you have to pick something. But some folks do multiple post grads. If you pick apprenticeship, that's it. That's the thing you're doing. Forever.

Personaly, I'm very happy to have a well rounded education. I became a software engineer 10 years after graduting university. I could do it, and could get hired for it, because of that education. All the skills you hone at university helped me alonng the way, writing, speaking, critical thinking, I even leaned to sail and fence.

Apprenticeships give you a single trade, university teaches you how to think, and makes you a better person.

54
Kichaereply
lemmy.ca

On top of that, apprenticeships are job training, and a unuversity education is... Not. And no number of 17 year old high school honours students, or their parents, or high school teachers, or university recruitment offices, or corporate HR departments have actually or will actually change that. And that's not to say there's anything inherently wrong with job training, but so much of the discourse around university's "usefulness" always boils down to "you spend all of this money, and they still don't teach you to do the job", which... Yeah. You don't get fried chicken from a tailor's shop, either.

Moreover, one of the key reasons university education is so damn expensive is because rich dicks don't want the poors getting one. And while they've managed to spin public perception of university as job training, and as a result managed to get people to go deeply into debt to target specific, non-comprehensive or non-critical degree programs, it remains true that a high level liberal education is soemthing they don't want us to have.

Because it gives us the tools to see through their lies and bullshit.

All we need to do is look at the degree programs they shit on most strongly: They're all rooted in examining and criticising social power dynamics. In response to that, they tell us that they'll be excited to "order their happy meals" from people perusing those fields.

Which, of course, isn't exactly rooted in falsehood, because most well paying businesses don't want to have people around who are trained in recognizing and criticising power dynamics.

Because they're abusive systems in and of themselves, run by people who don't want their power criticised or checked.

But that doesn't mean the ability to do so isn't unspeakably invaluable to society. But in a society run by entitled, unworthy assholes, the last thing they want is a populace who can recognize both that they have no place in a healthy society, and also the knowledge and gumption to create a healthy society and remove them from it.

15
curiousaurreply
reddthat.com

Ha, I studied philosophy. It was perfect for becoming a bartender. But also perfect for becoming a successful software engineer out of the blue at 30.

Thank you for these expanded points. I only talked about the pregmatics and my own experience, but all of what you said is extremely important and true.

7

Yeah, anyone can pick up a book and learn how to string code commands together. Not everyone who does so bothers to learn why they're doing it, or how to think through the implications of doing so. We see that over and over again in Silicon Valley today.

I imagine a philosophy background makes for well considered projects. I have a friend who was a developer in high school, who instead went into philosophy because he found his work absolutely soulless. No one he worked with wanted to think about what they were doing or why.

1
slrpnk.net

I used to think like that. As times passes I'm increasingly starting to agree with what you are saying. Sadly I do still think that is a matter of choice. There are poorly valued college educations and not all off them are philosophy and literature. I don't see anything wrong with them existing like you said, they teach people critical thinking and improve people overall. But like you said the lie that education exists to give us jobs exists and there are people going to college to learn not very lucrative things and expecting to make a living out them and coming out with dept and can't find an occupation that provides for them. Honestly I think the only way to go around that problem is to make University universal and free. That way you can always go back for something more lucrative or later in life to learn something that makes you grow.

3

Absolutely. Education at all levels is a boon to society at large, and it should be freely available to all. An educated populace makes the world a better, more equitable, and forward progressing palce.

An uneducated populace allows people exploit us all, and keep us working for their benefit, and not society's.

4
Torvumreply
lemmy.world

This is elitist trash mentality my guy. It's not that serious and you can gain life skills from anywhere. Happy you found it through the medium of uni, but lmao.

-4
curiousaurreply
reddthat.com

No, you really don't learn good critical thinking or argumentative writing from anywhere. This is precisely why most of the population can be tricked into voting against their own self interests. Furthermore, this shouldn't be seen as elitist, as this level of education should be available to everyone. The only reason it's not is the previous point I made.

2
Torvumreply
lemmy.world

That's just insanely retarded to say and why it's elitist to think you can only learn this from a college/uni. I guess literally every successful dropout never learned critical thinking, or self taught, or naturally skeptic, or literally any fucking human in the past where further education wasn't as readily accessible to the general population but still became renowned philosophers and inventors. "Sorry kids unless you spend borrowed money to indebt yourself for life you'll always be stupid unlike me" L

It's a predisposition to intelligence not that you had to pay for a glorified tutor. Shut the fuck up lmao.

-1

Dumbass acts like he's never met the kids who go to college without learning a fuckin thing because they simply aren't intelligent people.

This isn't a universal experience that you just magically absorb a new profound understanding of the world by stepping over the threshold of the classroom door. All those liberal arts majors sure are critical thinkers bro.

My god, remove your personal bias and actually read the shit you say disconnected then tell me you aren't elitist as fuck. I'm done with this bad faith and menial retardation blinded by your own worldview. Scum.

0
lemmy.world

Apprenticeships are infinitely more competitive than college applications. Not to say that the quality of education isn't much better, too, but most mentors are already swamped with dozens of apprenticeship requests. It's so competitive that most will expect you to already have some familiarity with the trade, whereas most colleges go into your education assuming you have very little experience with it.

Edit

Also

$19-$23 hour paid apprenticeships

Lmao only in already high COL areas. Plus having to compete with the 1,000+ other applicants (see above). Plus "we'll select a candidate in 4-6 months." Plus "must provide own tools. Our shop only allows Snap-On brand, here's a $2,200 shopping list in case you get chosen." Also "oh yeah that position was already filled last month, so-and-so's son just got out of rehab and needed a job."

T. An actual tradie of nearly a decade who has a proper 4 year university degree and tech school certification

46
lemmy.world

Electrician in IBEW here in a poor rural region. Those pay numbers are pretty close to our current rates, actually. And if you can pass a test, you can get into the apprenticeship program pretty easily. They don't expect much from first year apprentices. I had a trade school diploma and my Limited Liability Electrician license already when I applied, but it didn't matter much. The competitiveness is very dependent on your local.

You gotta buy your own hand tools, but power tools, conduit benders, etc are all provided.

So... like with everything career-related, it's gonna depend on where you live.

15
bl4ckbloocreply
lemmy.world

‘Appreciceships’ is a pretty broad thing too. I can think of more mechanics and carpenters I know that had to buy their own tools then plumber and electricians.

4
Knightfoxreply
lemmy.one

This is pretty representative of my area as well. The thing that is weird for me is that they priced it at 40 hrs per week. A friend of mine was an Electrician Apprentice and he worked 21 days in a row 10 hrs per day and he's in a union.

2
lemmy.world

Damn, that kinda OT is some good money but miss me with that. After 50 hours of solid work in a week I'm worthless lol.

But I do light commercial construction mostly, which is pretty go-go-go all day long with bird-dogging foremen. If I was doing industrial or large commercial there's usually some more breathing room.

1

Yeah I said the same, but he was pretty pumped for it. Apparently it's not so bad when you get out of the apprentice phase, but this is one of the concessions that their union makes. Essentially, the job has to get done by the deadline. The pros of it is that they have better benefits than government workers (his wife is a teacher), as an apprentice he was making $80k/year in 2019, and they were paying for him to go to night school for certifications (and giving him the time to do so).

I'm not sure on the classifications of work, but the kinds of jobs they did were things Amazon warehouses.

2

Where are you from? I am a carpenter from Ontario, Canada and I was an apprentice in the carpenters union for a few years. They literally hired me on the spot when I sent them my resume. I also worked with a 19 year old kid who'd never had a job in his life before being hired instantly when he walked into the union hall.

Also the pay started as $20 an hour for first years, and went up about $5 an hour for every year of experience. I think if I remember correctly journeymen made around $45 an hour with benefits, and my zone wasn't a super high COL area.

Maybe depends what apprenticeship you're looking for but in my experience the carpenters union was dying for guys.

1

Bro. Be more specific about where and what apprenticeship you are talking about. You're casting a wide web as if all the apprenticeships are in the same position. My specific trades of electrician and instrumentation are highly in demand in lots of places in Canada. Can't speak for everywhere, but there are a lot of large construction projects going on now that can't find workers.

The availability of apprenticeships are based off the economy vs going to school is based on whether you can afford it.

0
lemmy.ml

In Switzerland, apprenticeship is the standard for a good middle class income. It's a win-win situation for all involved and if you later feel like you want to go further in your career, there's a "master" training for your profession, which is considered by employers as equivalent to a master degree from an university. I'm not sure why such a system is not more popular in other countries.

39

Possibly has to do with status as pretty much since forever, university schooling has been a separator of middle class and "elite" (culturally) even though it has been made to be accessible by most people. At least one possible theory.

13

I have to strongly disagree here. It was the case until neoliberalism hit hard on the country. From the middle 90s, the apprenticeship isn't the standard to a good living anymore. We have roughly half of the households which are poor or near powerty. If the apprenticeship was a gold standard, it would not be the case. Teenagers learned it very well as they prefer to choose to study even after an apprenticeship.

Everything has took an exponential price hike. Healthcare insurance, rent, food, energy and more skyrocket and living is more and more difficult if you don't have a tertiary diploma.

2

You can tell this is an ancient meme because you somehow expect "non-full-time job" position to be worthwhile in any shape or form. If it's not a full-time position, my personal belief is that either 1) they're probably going to screw you over somehow, or 2) the government regulations are going to screw you over. (I'm in Finland. The government's going to screw you over if you do anything besides staring at the phone and accept the first full-time position that miraculously comes your way. In recent years, they invented a new activity: SPAM JOB APPLICATIONS. This has not worked as well the government thinks it did.)

20
lemm.ee

$15k/year raises? What industry? I'm in the wrong field! I'm lucky if my annual evaluation gets me a COL adjustment, much less an actual raise.

14
chaoracereply
lemmy.sdf.org

I hear that HVAC payscales are pretty nuts. The trick apparently is putting yourself back on the market at the start of each summer season -- there are never enough HVAC people when July comes around.

2
Actersreply
lemmy.world

To combat heat, I built a cooled water loop tubing into a breathable one piece suit, I like to say I got the idea from NASA to get people to not worry about my dress attire when I arrive. Wikipedia has it under the name liquid cooled garment.

2

You guys see what I'm talking about? HVAC people. Forged in the summer heat until they become monsters

1
lemmy.ml

This doesn't work for some fields imo. I don't know how I could train someone in computer science if they don't even know how a for loop works yet.

14
lemmy.world

Senior dev: "Hey junior... " waves a piece of paper "The fuck is this?"

Junior Dev: "My code, boss."

SD: squints

JD: "I couldn't figure out how to email it."

SD: squints

JD: ...

SD: "Why is there a picture of a cat?"

JD: "It's Scratch, sir."

17

There is a non-null chance the Senior Developer is an absolute God at scratch.

2

It's a regular thing in Germany.

Our apprenticeships are a lot cheaper though, below minimum wage, so it's easier for the employer to set aside time for training that doesn't earn money.

4
EnderMBreply
lemmy.world

I'll chime in with a comment above, but I am an apprenticeship mentor at a big tech company, and while you are somewhat correct, most apprenticeship schemes will mix in academic learning alongside on-the-job training.

It's a great way to learn if you are motivated. If you're not, it's immensely stressful compared to studying for a degree.

2
Blackmistreply
feddit.uk

UK businesses abuse the apprenticeship system for profit.

Like fucking Subway were taking on apprentices. Because making a sandwich clearly takes years of training, rather than about a day. Nothing to do with being able to pay them half the minimum wage, oh no, can't be that.

But then "not in my job description" is something I stopped hearing when I left school. In the real world, your job is what your boss tells you to do (within reason), otherwise you don't have a job any more.

8

The apprenticeship thing and pay scales only work when you're talking about union jobs in skilled trades. Which are very hard to come by.

I'm not knocking blue-collar jobs--all labor deserves to be paid a living, and thriving, wage--but that's not an honest assessment.

11

This is correct, but it's virtually impossible to get most desk jobs without a degree.

Not because the degree is important, only because it's a requirement.

So if you can afford it, unfortunately, I would recommend the degree path.

9

Maybe in America...

Here you have 5 years of free college for bachelor and 5 years free for masters.

6

I work as a mentor for an apprenticeship scheme at a large tech company, and work alongside several apprentices.

While it's not fully serious, there are a few inaccuracies. On the whole, I think the apprenticeship scheme is a great way to get people into work, especially as software engineers. In fact, I would put them way above bootcamps, which are essentially ways to part someone with their money in return for cheap labour.

With that being said, here are a few gotchas:

  • Most employers/mentors don't give a fuck about your progression. You're an additional resource, and you're treated as such. Sadly, mentors that do give a shit typically end up getting shit from their managers because it's not "a priority".
  • The money is often poor, even at FAANG companies. This is because you're not a full-time employee, so you are heavily downlevelled, earning the same as other non-tech office positions. In some locations, it's the difference between being able to go for lunch outside of the office with the rest of the team, and being forced to eat leftovers with the other apprentices/interns because you cannot afford lunch.
  • There is a classroom aspect to apprenticeships, like with any part-time degree course.
  • That four years of experience you hold at the end often isn't viewed as valid by other employers. I've worked with apprentices that have finished 4-5 years at a FAANG company, only to struggle to find work afterwards, despite being fully qualified with a degree-equivalent qualification, and having worked on production services. Some get treated worse than new CS grads for roles.
  • Many subjects require a mix of academic and manual skilled work, software engineering is no different. Many apprentices feel the lack of CS fundamentals to severely limit them, even if just as a habit of FOMO, given that many of them can complete the standard LeetCode curriculums you see online. If you work at a company full of Oxbridge, Harvard, and MIT grads, it's hard to not feel inferior at times.

I still fully recommend people take apprenticeships, but I always say that it's not a route for everyone. The people I work with that have benefited most are self-sufficient, humble, and willing to learn. Those that aren't often find it extremely stressful and end up questioning whether a degree is better for them. As with most things, it's an option, and options are a good thing.

4

UK here, on an apprenticeship and earning £40,000+ a year.

Recognise I'm exceptionally lucky but no idea how anyone could afford to complete a degree while living independently in current times.

3

It is valid path for some, maybe even for majority of people, but not for all. If you have smarts then college->undergrad-graduate school can lead you to the job of your dreams and well paid on top of this. For example, if you excel in math and physics, and want to be a rocket scientist, by all means, take a shot. Even if you miss, lots of STEM jobs pay well in industry.

3

community college can be $5,000ish per year (in community rn), and if you go to a smaller local college after that it might be like double or triple that per year. the average of $9,000 is still lowballing it a good bit, but you can lower the $30,000 figure a decent bit

(i am in no way saying that college isn't as expensive as people say-- it is. i am saying that community college and lower quality colleges are options many people don't include in these sorts of averages. i thought i was boned but community college saved my ass.)

3
Torvumreply
lemmy.world

Government allows infinite lending to stupid unexperienced children, children tell colleges their tuition is on the house, colleges raise tuition costs knowing their premium is secured by either wealthy families or the infinite pockets of the government, students keep being told the lie college is the only outlet to a better life, keep taking more loans. Rinse and repeat.

So many soft losers in this thread who think the epitome of life is wasting away at a desk all day looking at code and coping with the lifelong debt they took to experience it. Unironically some moron who thinks that you can only gain critical thinking from going to a uni, completely ignoring children who show the predisposition for higher intelligence among their peers. You can't teach intelligence. Stockholm syndrome cope fr.

2
MataVatnikreply
lemmy.world

Yup, I got a chemistry degree. Yeah I get paid marginally better but considering how much it cost and all the trouble I went through I could've done something else I wanted to make money. Education is great and enriching, but we shouldn't become debt slaves over it.

2

I wonder why college board salaries keep rising but the overall availability and quality of education isn't?? Curious..

2
lemmy.world

Honestly, would my wife and I need to save up only $1k per month for the next 16 years to pay for my kid's college? That sounds absurdly do-able and easy. I'm all for trade school too. My Wife and I went to a more technical college and are doing fairly good for ourselves. Will hope our kid goes the same path. We got our college degree and in between years we had jobs in our industry and did interning. That's the best of both worlds IMO.

-1
lemmy.ml

Honestly, would my wife and I need to save up only $1k per month for the next 16 years to pay for my kid’s college?

16x12 = 192,000.. Where are you getting this number from? That's enough to put 2 kids through even the more expensive US colleges, assuming investments outperform tuition hikes

5

Given inflation, current estimates put the cost of a 4 year degree at about 180k in 2040, so not an unreasonable savings estimate. That number is both available from online estimates as well as what my own financial planner gave me when discussing my daughter's college fund

1