Spyke
sik0fewlreply
kbin.social

This one's not military, but a research vessel for Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

9
sh.itjust.works

Except that it isn't. The Canadian Coast Guard is a purely civilian organization. For example, they don't partake in the war on drugs like their American counterparts do, and they don't have weapons either.

3
Otterreply
lemmy.ca

Although CCG personnel are neither a naval nor law enforcement force, they may operate CCG vessels in support of naval operations, or they may serve an operational role in the delivery of maritime law enforcement and security services in Canadian federal waters by providing a platform for personnel serving with one or more law enforcement agencies.

Interesting, so it's more of a civilian paramilitary organization? I'd say the vessels are still needed, even if it's not directly military

5

No not even paramilitary, their assistance to military and law enforcement is limited to transport basically. Bus drivers essentially...

CG is great, it's annoying that this project is over budget, but I have no problem with them getting funded and equipped.

0
Rodeoreply
lemmy.ca

"I'm not wrong! I'm just sort of wrong ...."

-1

It was about as valuable as your second comment. Your original comment I agree with, however.

1

That's the cost of keeping ship building industry alive in Canada. It's likely cheaper if the Koreans or Chinese built it.

6

WHEN a project-cost increases TO A FACTOR-OF-5-TIMES the budgeted cost,

THEN criminal-convictions should be happening.

Just as normal commercial-contracts have a "kill this contract" point, for noncompliance, so too must public-taxpayer-payed projects, at 1.4x or 2x hard-max.

Extortion isn't acceptable, "just because it is government".

Take that extra-billion out of elected-authorities' pensions & pay!

Make the ones who mismanage pay.

Accountability, right?

: P

( :

2

You reached the end