Spyke

It's because people want to imagine themselves as a hero, engaging in one on one combat. A knight or samurai.

They don't want to imagine themselves as a barely trained serf in a block with 30 other people holding 3m long pikes trying not to shit yourself as arrows start to rain down.

120
LemmysMumreply
lemmy.world

Shit, even in one on one martial combat, give me range and I'll take it. Knife < Sword < Spear < Bow

30
lemmy.world

Knife < sword < spear < bow < crossbow < trebuchet < arbalists thrown by trebuchets

12

Knife < sword < spear < bow < crossbow < trebuchet < arbalists thrown by trebuchets < napalm thrown by trebuchets

1
lemmy.world

It was only folded so many times because the ore on Honshu is pretty low grade and had to have the carbon worked out of it more than European steel.

109
slrpnk.net

Wait, you mean it's not because it gives me the ability to part steel plate in a single slash?

52

Wow you must be a novice if you still need to slash. A true bushido master can cut steel without unsheathing the blade.

31

As I understand it, it wasn't to work the carbon out of it, but instead to simply evenly spread the impurities throughout the whole sword, so there weren't any specific points of weakness

29

Traditional tomahogonany is still made in small quantities in mud furnaces.

5
Narrrzreply
kbin.social

the bow and arrow is just a logical extension of mankind's desire to poke each other at ever longer range.

72
kbin.social

rock->spear->bow and arrow->cannon->handheld cannon->auto-repeating handheld cannon->howitzer->ICBM->Predator drone

20
Shurimalreply
kbin.social

->relativistic kill vehicle.

You see it coming, omae wa mou shindeiru.

Only thing more scary would be triggering a vacuum decay event. But these tend to backfire quite spectacularly.

12
lemmy.one

This just in- being able to hurt your enemy from farther away than they can hurt you conveys a large tactical advantage. More at 11.

58
ludreply
lemm.ee

Wait until you hear about Spears with shields.

12
ludreply
lemm.ee

Ancient Greek and Rome used them quite a lot, as I know.

3

The famous Roman legion rarely engaged in formation combat with sword and shield, more often Fighting started with spear and shield and moved to sword and shield.

1
discuss.tchncs.de

Even for all who had swords, their primary assault weapon was usually some form of pointy murder stick, usually handheld and horse-propelled

52
Tanktonreply
lemm.ee

The sword is the pistol of ancient times whereas the sprear is the assault rifle.

24

That analogy bothers me more than it should because pistols are generally cheaper than assault rifles (but I get your point)

5
mander.xyz

It isn't folded 1000 times, only about 10 times.

14
slrpnk.net

Sir, your fedora is showing

But really, its a sword not noodles (which are folded when made by hand)

7
lemmy.ml

You need to arm 100 guys? 100 spears is a lot cheaper and easier to train than 100 swords.

9

Present in very many cultures as well. Be it called yari, ji, iklwa or sarissa they are all long pokey sticks.

5

Sharpening a stick regardless of length is probably one of the easiest ways to get a weapon

7

Spears are way harder to make a cool spectacle in fantasy though

Kinda reminds me of that scene in Indiana Jones where the guy is doing a load of flashy movements with his sword and he just gets shot in the face

1