Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

10 replies

brsrklfreply
jlai.lu

Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too.

It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now.

That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess.

23
lemmy.world

It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.

10

Apparently so.

I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.

6

I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess.

Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.

6

Ok please enlighten us with the many uses for a dead basketball player.

Jk

4

I wonder what the practical difference will be between accessing ChatGPT through Bing vs accessing Bing through ChatGPT. I don't have a premium account with OpenAI so I cannot test myself. Anyone given it a whirl?

7

In my experience ChatGPT and Bing provide completely different output for the same prompt.

It's the same underlying technology but the end product is completely different. I find ChatGPT Plus infinitely more useful than Bing.

As a test, I just had a chat with both about a big news story that dropped yesterday... and both answered the questions reasonably well, but they weren't the same at all and I preferred ChatGPT.

2

You reached the end