Spyke

Houston approves $5M to relocate residents living near polluted Union Pacific rail yard

Residents and local officials have long blamed the high number of cancer cases on contamination from a rail yard originally owned by Southern Pacific and later bought by Union Pacific near two historically Black neighborhoods, Fifth Ward and Kashmere Gardens. The wood preservative creosote, which has been associated with an increased risk of contracting cancer, was used for more than 80 years at the site until the 1980s. City officials say the contamination has reached the groundwater in the neighborhoods.

During a city council meeting in which the funding was approved, Mayor Sylvester Turner said Houston “has a moral obligation” to help relocate residents away from the four different cancer clusters that have been identified in recent years. Health officials have found higher rates of respiratory cancers as well as childhood cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Houston approves $5M to relocate residents living near polluted Union Pacific rail yardhttps://apnews.com/article/houston-relocates-residents-polluted-neighborhood-cancer-2cbf90418dc6911191b46c8ac529040bOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.world

It's great this is happening, but in a just world Union Pacific would be forking over $5MM, not everyone else.

37
bobmanreply
unilem.org

Privatize the gains, socialize the losses.

22

The article says, "relocating families from among the 100 properties that have been affected by the contamination could cost up to $35 million. The city is looking at other sources, including federal funding, to help pay for the relocation program."

10

If you own a home in the area any equity you have there has probably been made pretty worthless. It would make it pretty hard to move if you couldn't sell your home to afford another.

19

The fuck you gonna buy house for <175K plus moving expenses? Not like you're gonna be able to easily sell your house in THE CANCER ZONE.

15
zzzzzzreply
lemmy.ml

Yeah, but $5m sounds kind of low. That'll buy, what, 10 homes?

11
bobmanreply
unilem.org

Can't they just take it from the company that profited off of pollution?

5
SheeEttinreply
lemmy.world

If they do, they'll tie it up in the courts for decades. Meanwhile, people will be getting cancer and dying.

2

The problem is the feds and SCOTUS have failed to protect people instead of capitalism.

1

Of course it just so happens they'll be moving people from some of the poorest neighborhoods breaking up the community and diluting their votes elsewhere. It's not specifically the reason for doing this, but is definitely a side effect

4

You reached the end