Spyke
lemmynsfw·Lemmy NSFWbyMikey Mongol

AI-created children count as children and are forbidden content

I can't believe that I have to post this, but AI kiddie stuff is still kiddie stuff. It may or may not be illegal where you live, but it is not OK to post on this instance and we will ban you with extreme prejudice. Thank you.

View original on lemmynsfw.com
lemmy.world

Hard agree. Though I do have a question I imagine these are people with desires(wrong or bad), but a human drive none the less. Acting on that is wrong I fully agree. However if we keep calling them crepes and idiots and other names like this. People who have these desires and realize they are problematic, where can they go? We are literally pushing them away without giving them an option to redeem.

The reason i put this here is because creating this stigma will make more people more desperate, making in turn more kiddie stuff.

For anyone reading this, go to a counselor, a trusted gp, a psychiatrist who doesn't judge. Do not act on these desires, but find help to talk about them.

138

Yup. Fundamentally, being attracted to children isn't any different from a foot fetish. They can't change how their brain is wired, and they're not monsters for feeling that way. They should absolutely be able to seek help without concern.

And, while I believe the AI gen stuff is disgusting, if it prevents a real child from being abused... Idk, it's a super nuanced issue.

Now, that all changes if they start trying to act on those feelings.

67
lemmynsfw.com

If we're talking about the same person, there was one multi-image post that was unquestionably over the line and one or two more that were (IMO) borderline. Given the context provided by the one post we chose not to give the benefit of any doubt.

50

Them: "But it's not even real"

Us: "The intent is though, you fucking creep."

Them: "There's nothing illegal about it."

Us: "HOW ARE YOU NOT GETTING THE FUCKING POINT HERE?"

60

no its ok c she's 1000 yr old spirit trapped in a child's body its totally different 🤢

13

@just_another_person @MikeyMongol they NEVER respond to any point. That is how you detect them. They don’t talk. They state. They ignore response beyond “what about …?” Or otherwise changing the subject. They do not discuss. They disturb their victims hoping for an unsettled soul who might turn to their side. I have had to unfriend a lot of people because this is below they behave.

3

Ngl when I started reading this I didn’t look at the community, and thought this was going into tax benefits for some reason.

38
lemmy.ca

i feel icky just reading this comment section

31
lemmy.world

What are you seeing? I only see people happy with this, and one idiot making a comment about Loli

18
Swimreply
lemmy.ca

get the fuck outta here, are you endorsing this ?

2
Swimreply
lemmy.ca

dude are you just parroting what in saying ? are you a bot?

3
lemmynsfw.com

I think they're confused because they only see comments saying it is wrong and also being on Mastodon it replies differently. Just a guess.

5

Took me a minute to figure out that you weren't talking about denying content to immature AI models, lol. I may need some food.

12

Anyone who generates or consumes this type of content should just do the world a favor and die. I’m not joking. And I will not be taking questions or “what-about-isms”.

-13
Throwawayreply
lemm.ee

Did you mean to reply to the other guy?

17
Throwawayreply
lemm.ee

Im into busty milfs. I'm just aware that I have to filter out loli shit.

Heres my current filter list if you're curious:

-shota -loli -ntr -cheating -incest -femdom -netorare -blacked

24

In 1984, sexuality is emancipatory for Witson and Julian. It's an act of resistance, because sex between consenting adults is a life drive (Eros) opposed to a dead society (Thanatos) that crushes individuals.

To link the defense of pedopornography (i.e. of children crushed by forced sexual relations), with 1984 is a complete contradiction in terms.

38