AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult In Berkeley, California
We might some day have “AI Safety”, as a science or policy area, that is not primarily a sex cult in Berkeley, California, but it does not currently exist.
TW: Sexual Assault
https://www.verysane.ai/p/ai-safety-is-mostly-a-sex-cult-in-berkeley-californiaOpen linkView original on piefed.social
21 replies
I'm about 25 percent into the article and this part seems important:
Sick. How do we get in?^1^
1: I just want to be clear, I think most things should be sex cults.
Send me your application
While i like the idea of sex cults; I don't like the idea of being in a sex cult full of racist techbros that hold the religious belief that AM will go terminator on us.
I think this article is at least ten times longer than it needs to be. No wonder people are focusing on the stuff related to the headline.
Sad indictment of American tech culture to be honest.
I feel like you only need first principles and solve precautionary logic to care about AI safety. Not some pseudo-intellectual circle-jerk-first.
Jesus Christ, it's literally just a bunch of weird modern poly people
I think poly people can be a bit odd but you have to be pretty fucking conservative in your values to call that a sex cult.
...
On further reading, Aella does seem pretty fucking problematic. Sex is great, drugs can be great, but both require a ton of responsibility... especially CNC orgies... You can't fly that fast and not crash.
I'm not blaming the drugs, but don't be surprised if people with good intentions fuck up when they can't think straight. And she sounds extra irresponsible and wanting to push every limit.
Reading this, it took me a minute to remember where I'd previously seen Aella online. It turns out she is the model who went majorly viral on Reddit years ago for staging /GoneWild photo shoots in which she was terrorized by gnome statues.
https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/interviews/aella-discusses-her-viral-history-showering-habits-lsd-gnome-posting-and-spicy-birthday-party
It bums me out that someone who once had the creativity, self-awareness, and sense of humor to succeed in that sort of thing went on to do awful stuff.
What are "computer numerical control orgies?"
CNC = consentual non-consentual. I.e., pretending to SA as a fetish.
See the "Brangus Unchained" section of the posted writing.
I thought it was "can not cum"
Do they practice safe sex by having orgies in a Faraday box?
EDIT: about 50% into the article, the sex they practice doesn't seem very safe, sane, or consensual
basically horny reddit mods
It's sex cults all the way down.
Just because anybody's a sex pervert doesn't mean they're wrong about something completely other than sex.
Adopting that judgement about their person means that only white Christian monogamous hetero cis men are valued for their expertise.
You need to read up more on Yudkowski and the cult of The Rationalists.
I urge you to read beyond the headline. The author intentionally buries the lede; it is too obscene to be taken seriously if stated flat. I agree with your statement.
This piece is not some ad homenim attacking the character of these prominent AI safety figures, using this attack on their character to claim that their work on AI safety is wrong/incorrect/invalid because of their sex cult.
This is about exposing the power dynamics which core leaders of AI safety groups which are highly influential across tech in SF. These persons fetishistically prefer simulated rape, and are bonded together by this preference.
I agree that they are a really creepy bunch of people with very large egos, but I'm not sure about it being an organised cult.
I will say that I would absolutely hate to receive an invite to these disgustingly crusty orgies.
There was a YouTuber I saw with some more inside stuff... let me check.
Found it! The AI Apocalypse is Decadent & Depraved - YouTube by NetLoss. Definitely an interesting story.
Go Bears?