Spyke
lemmy.world

It may still be working. They should put some generals in it and take it for a test dive.

38
sh.itjust.works

The good news is, the submarine is now even better at submerging rapidly.

31
Dremorreply
lemmy.world

But the drawback is that the number of submersion is reduced to one.

11
lemmy.world

If it's considered repairable, it's probably 2 years+.

The USS Ross is looking at almost two years for much needed maintenance repairs all over. 18 months on major repairs is generally considered rapid.

But, based on history, they'll go cheap with as many shortcuts as possible, so it'll be reactivated sooner than expected but sink a few months later, by its own accord. Obviously damaging the environment with it, or some other dramatic fuck up to deal with on top. It's the Russian way.

24

There's actually a famous instance of it happening. K-19. They had to go into the reactor room to fix up the cooling because of botched manufacturing process.

What happened to them after can only be described as gruesome. I'd rather a bullet to the brain after.

2
Deestanreply
lemmy.world

The photos are from the Conflict Intelligence Team, who are not operating with permission from the Russian military.

Any accidental reflection, or visible detail that could identify people in the background or time the photo, could give the Russian police enough information to track down the photographer.

28

Maybe so they won't know where it's being held?

Maybe it got moved to a new drydock to get fixed and they want to obscure where it is.

4
lemmy.ml

The original, non-edited picture has been floating around already for the last 24 hours, what an annoying pic to look at when it's blurred like that.

12
lemmy.world

I imagine holes on a submarine are a pretty dangerous thing, yeah.

And those are some very, ah, large, holes.

7

You reached the end