Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sh.itjust.works
washington·Washingtonbyvelma

WA foster parents no longer have to support LGBTQ+ kids in their care

“Saying that we would love and care for any child was not enough,” Jenn DeGross said. “They were asking us then to be very specific: ‘Will you use their preferred pronouns? Will you take them to Pride parades? Will you take them to [gender-affirming] medical appointments?’ Things that, as Christians, we could not be supportive of or affirm.”

The DeGrosses refused, and the state declined to renew their license — raising questions about the religious freedom of foster parents, the role of Washington state in protecting youth in care, and how best to manage the shortage of qualified foster parents.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal advocacy organization, sued on the DeGrosses’ behalf, saying the new license requirement violated their constitutional rights to free speech and free exercise of their religion. The organization has brought similar lawsuits in Massachusetts and Vermont.

Washington state chose to settle and agreed to remove the requirement that people who want to be foster parents support children’s gender identity and sexuality.

Thousands of children are in foster care in Washington state. They enter the system after a state department verifies reports of abuse, neglect, or abandonment. If they don’t have family members who can care for them, they’re often placed with a licensed foster caregiver.

No one tracks how many of Washington’s foster children identify as LGBTQ+, but about a quarter of young adults under 30 do, and children in foster care are more likely to identify as LGBTQ+ than the population as a whole.

WA foster parents no longer have to support LGBTQ+ kids in their carehttps://www.kuow.org/law/2026-10-15/wa-foster-parents-no-longer-have-to-support-lgbtq-kids-in-their-careOpen linkView original on sh.itjust.works
20

5 replies

I fucking hate Christian fascists. "Me me me mememememememememe" all the fucking time, without consideration for anyone else. Foster parents make a choice, fostered kids didn't. The law is correct and good, actually, and Washington State is full of cowards

19

WA state lawyers and legislators are cowards. I’d be in favor of fighting the christofascists

4
sh.itjust.works

For a few years, before the DeGrosses sued, the state added a new requirement: that prospective foster parents agree to use a child’s preferred name and pronouns, and take them to medical appointments for gender-affirming care.

Nathan LaChine, a longtime foster parent near Tacoma, said he agreed with that requirement.

“Everything as a foster parent is relationship based,” LaChine said. “The basic principle of a relationship is correct name and correct pronouns. And how do I build a parent-child working relationship with a kid if I’m not using the correct name and correct pronouns?”

“What we're talking about is [the] religious freedom of a foster parent who chooses to be involved in the foster care system versus youth that, through no fault of their own, did not choose to be in foster care,” he said. “And now their rights and safety aren’t being [protected].”

Shout out to Nathan LaChine.

14

Absolutely. The potential foster parents either conform or don't participate. Super simple.

7

Clearly they can't step on their religious teachings against such things... oh wait. Christians, help an old atheist out because I haven't cracked a Bible in a long time. Where does it say anything about being against transgender people? I do remember the loving thy neighbor stuff, so it can't be in that part.

Bigotry, fear, and hate masked behind religion. And the religion is okay with it, it always has been.

7

You reached the end

WA foster parents no longer have to support LGBTQ+ kids in their care | Spyke