interestingasfuckbytime2lose Jaques Biederer was the first photographer in history to specialize in erotic photos. This photo was taken in Paris in 1928.View original on lemmy.world184Comments24Reply
AAmerica sh.itjust.worksGet yourself a man who looks at you like Jaques Biederer looks at genitals44Reply
ffubarx lemmy.worldIt actually goes further back to 1830s and Dagguerotypes: https://www.all-about-photo.com/photography-article/607/a-brief-history-of-nude-photography-1839-193933Reply
RRothe piefed.social2Hide 2 repliesHe was definitely not the first photographer to specialise in that. Photographic pornography was invented basically the same time as photography was.22Reply
rrslogix89 replylemmy.world“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.”1Reply
__stranger_ replylemmy.worldThe first photographer in history to specialize in photographing a pornographer.40Reply
GrantUsEyes piefed.zipStudio Biederer was managed along with his brother, they produced some work that still looks very.... contemporary. Specially their bdsm shots. Here's an archive of their work. https://studiobiederer.wordpress.com/2026/06/15/mistress-at-work/10Reply
eessell lemmy.worldReminds me of modern social media pictures in two ways... One, someone is taking a photo of someone taking a photo Two, he's done some trick photography so he can play both people in the photo8Reply
DDagwoodIII replypiefed.social4Hide 4 repliesRealistically, you shouldn't be looking at this site at work at all.17Reply
Catoblepas replylemmy.blahaj.zone3Hide 3 repliesCome up with a widely recognized abbreviation for ‘flag this so it’s blurred for people browsing their phone in public’ if it bothers you 🤷♂️6Reply
DDagwoodIII replypiefed.social2Hide 2 repliesMaybe you should take it as a sign that you should read actual books?-3Reply
Catoblepas replylemmy.blahaj.zone1Hide 1 replyBecause I’m on my phone (which has accessibility features to keep me from getting motion sickness) on the bus instead of reading a book? Weird conclusion to jump to5Reply
DDagwoodIII replypiefed.socialebooks are a thing. You know, reading text, not unlike this, except it's an entire book. Or a short story. Have you ever read 'The Tower of the Elephant?'0Reply
Catoblepas replylemmy.blahaj.zone4Hide 4 repliesSome of us go outside and don’t want to be flashing what OP described as erotica at whatever children are looking over our shoulders.0Reply
cctrl_alt_esc replylemmy.ml3Hide 3 repliesOP didn't describe the picture as erotica. That's a picture of the dude taking those erotic pics.9Reply
Catoblepas replylemmy.blahaj.zone2Hide 2 repliesWanting people to unintentionally flash this photo to kids in public is fucking weird.-1Reply
24 replies
Get yourself a man who looks at you like Jaques Biederer looks at genitals
It actually goes further back to 1830s and Dagguerotypes: https://www.all-about-photo.com/photography-article/607/a-brief-history-of-nude-photography-1839-1939
He was definitely not the first photographer to specialise in that. Photographic pornography was invented basically the same time as photography was.
Do vs specialise maybe.
There was porno on freaking cave paintings.
Looks like he enjoys his job....
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.”
But who's taking that photo.
The first photographer in history to specialize in photographing a pornographer.
Studio Biederer was managed along with his brother, they produced some work that still looks very.... contemporary. Specially their bdsm shots.
Here's an archive of their work.
https://studiobiederer.wordpress.com/2026/06/15/mistress-at-work/
Reminds me of modern social media pictures in two ways...
One, someone is taking a photo of someone taking a photo
Two, he's done some trick photography so he can play both people in the photo
Bet he saw some fuzzy beavers.
Nsfw this please
Realistically, you shouldn't be looking at this site at work at all.
Come up with a widely recognized abbreviation for ‘flag this so it’s blurred for people browsing their phone in public’ if it bothers you 🤷♂️
Maybe you should take it as a sign that you should read actual books?
Because I’m on my phone (which has accessibility features to keep me from getting motion sickness) on the bus instead of reading a book? Weird conclusion to jump to
ebooks are a thing.
You know, reading text, not unlike this, except it's an entire book.
Or a short story. Have you ever read 'The Tower of the Elephant?'
Real strict at your Nunnery, huh?
Some of us go outside and don’t want to be flashing what OP described as erotica at whatever children are looking over our shoulders.
OP didn't describe the picture as erotica. That's a picture of the dude taking those erotic pics.
Wanting people to unintentionally flash this photo to kids in public is fucking weird.
You're the one came up with the idea.
I didn’t invent scrolling in public.