According to the article this thing can theoretically store roughly 0.01% - 0.02% of our currently yearly C02 emissions. Not nothing (depending on the costs, longevity and environmental impact) but also not useful because carbon capture is mostly nonsense greenwashing anyway.
3 replies
According to the article this thing can theoretically store roughly 0.01% - 0.02% of our currently yearly C02 emissions. Not nothing (depending on the costs, longevity and environmental impact) but also not useful because carbon capture is mostly nonsense greenwashing anyway.
Avoiding such tiny amounts of CO2 definitely would be easier, cheaper and much more sustainable.
But don't you dare asking people to change anything. Don't you ever dare.
But who would then pay our fossil overlords and their stooges in media and politics?