Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on infosec.pub
progressivepolitics·Progressive PoliticsbyCubitOom

Appeals court rejects ICE detention policy, setting stage for SCOTUS

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/52167496

“Mass detention of marginalized individuals without due process harkens back to some of the darkest moments in our country’s history,” 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Nicole Berner, a Biden appointee, wrote in a 2-1 majority opinion joined by Judge Barbara Keenan, an Obama appointee.

“Those shameful and abhorrent past detentions were limited in scope in comparison to the mandatory detention that the Government urges us today to find that Congress established thirty years ago in an ambiguously worded statutory provision. We decline to do so,” Berner wrote.

It’s the ninth loss in a row for ICE at federal appeals courts, all of which have now ruled on the policy. The Supreme Court is all but certain to take up the issue in its next term.

Appeals court rejects ICE detention policy, setting stage for SCOTUShttps://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/10/trump-ice-detention-appeals-courts-01070427Open linkView original on infosec.pub
48

3 replies

lemmy.world

Sometimes SCOTUS does shit that isn't entirely abhorrent, maybe this will be one of those times. If only somebody had told Democrats this would happen while they still had Joey B in the White House, maybe they could have expanded the court. (/s)

10

Honestly they should have packed the courts when they had the chance. This and Joe Biden not simply forgiving student loans is all anyone needs to point at to say that he's not really a liberal.

6

“Mass detention of marginalized individuals without due process harkens back to some of the darkest moments in our country’s history,” 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Nicole Berner, a Biden appointee, wrote in a 2-1 majority opinion joined by Judge Barbara Keenan, an Obama appointee.

“Those shameful and abhorrent past detentions were limited in scope in comparison to the mandatory detention that the Government urges us today to find that Congress established thirty years ago in an ambiguously worded statutory provision. We decline to do so,” Berner wrote.

It’s the ninth loss in a row for ICE at federal appeals courts, all of which have now ruled on the policy. The Supreme Court is all but certain to take up the issue in its next term.

9

You reached the end