Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on jlai.lu

5 replies

Or you can crush the people through having a communist dictator for life. They love talking about the people, but ultimately the people are reduced to livestock of the people running the state.

2
feddit.uk

As opposed to Lenin's own version: To never decide which members of the ruling class is to repress and crush the people. This is the real essence of state "socialism".

1
Badreply
jlai.lu

Two things can be bad at once.

What the USSR became doesn't invalidate Lenin's critiques of capitalism and bourgeois society.

1
Zombiereply
feddit.uk

Lenin's moral authority to proselytise vanished during his time in power. There is no need to quote him like this, and therefore portray him in a positive light, when others have said similar before, during, and after his time.

For example:

A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.

  • Lysander Spooner, 1808 - 1887

https://www.anarchistquotes.com/lysander-spooner-quote-anarcho-individualist-4/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysander_Spooner

5
Badreply

I have no issue portraying Lenin's many contributions to marxist theory in a positive light.

It is possible to condemn one's actions where appropriate while still acknowledging they were right about other things.

2

You reached the end

Bourgeois parliamentarism | Spyke