Poll showing Bass leading Raman by double digits was bogus, company says
Archived at https://archive.ph/Wk9ix
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-08-17/poll-showing-bass-leading-raman-by-double-digits-was-bogus-company-saysOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
15 replies
Lol. 60% of the voting public in the county still dumb af.
AKA attempting to swing an election.
Was it even? Like to be totally clear I think everyone involved with this was/is fucking scum who did damage to everyone's faith in democracy and willingness to trust anything they read, but I really can't figure out their actual goal here. One of the people they showed winning was on the left and lost, another person they showed inflated numbers for was a centrist and ultimately got the most votes, so it's all over the map ideologically speaking.
My best guess at this point is that this was actually an attempt to manipulate betting markets and profit off of that, but this whole thing needs a bunch of subpoenas before we'll have any clue why they did this.
The one thing I will say with confidence at this point is that everyone involved in this was fucking scum and they need to be named and shamed so they can't ever abuse public trust like this again, so I hope there's more reporting on this.
This is legit the first place my mind went when reading the headline. This should open them up to lawsuits.
It was to undermine Raman, the progressive, to push Bass as the centrist. It's part of a larger effort to cast progressive policies as unpopular. You can tell by the enormous (and obviously fake) margin they gave Bass.
Looks like it gets worse. They refuse to name the company directors, they've done the same thing in Wisconsin and Nevada, and they just shut down yesterday:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_Strategies
I really hope the "It's just a prank bro" defense does not work
Public what?
Exactly
By showing the leftist as being in the lead, they might have convinced leftist voters that their votes weren't needed to secure the election of their preferred candidate.
Cuts both ways though. It could have also discouraged voters further to the right from voting because it was a lost cause.
And also the inverse, that centrist people afraid of a progressive winning would feel more pressured to come out and vote.
The left are generally willing to do stuff with less assurance of success. The right tend to not have imagination and don't like taking the chance of association with a loser. Liberals in particular among right wing ideologies are totally demoralized by not having already won.
By lying. Yes.
"It was just a social experiment!", said every douchebag in the early oughts (and even later), when they fucked around on social media and then found out.
Now they make phony polling companies but still make the same weak-sss, bullshit excuse.
"Not taking interviews."
I wonder if they actually think they are clever and tricked everyone? Could they really be that fucking stupid? Or just so fucking lazy that they couldn't be bothered to make up a better lie than, "It was just a prank, bro!"
Straight to jail