Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.sdf.org
funhole·Funholebypieguy

FUCC AGM 2026 - Phase 3: Points of Order

Overall AGM plan here

Members are invited to stand on points of order should they believe something went wrong during phase 2. The speaker shall propose a resolution that members can vote on. This phase shall end 48 hours after time of opening. (2026-08-20 01:00 UTC)

View original on lemmy.sdf.org
16

79 replies

pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I am not seeing any votes on this, and the deadline has passed. Perhaps AGM 2027

2
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Well... Given that my procedure in case of tie proposal was rejected, and the implicit vote proposal was tied... it is possible this will pass should I interpret these outcomes as ties change status quo thus implicits are accounted for.

2
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

I'm very pleased by this outcome

3
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

I'll take that bet!

Do you change for a twenty?

3
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I don't recall any motions passing saying you have veto!

2
jdr
lemmy.ml

During phase two something went wrong with my neck and now it still hurts. I propose that it stop hurting and furthermore I regain the ability to look over my left shoulder.

6
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

I've never even seen twin peaks

4
lemmy.sdf.org

Now that motions have been tabled and voted on, it has come to my attention that some motions received perhaps one or two votes. It was the assumption of the speaker that a given motion would be implicitly voted YEA by the member tabling, however I did not make that clear. Furthermore, I did not make clear that in the result of a tie, the status quo would remain (motion defeated).

My friends in content, do you accept that motions tabled as part of phase 2 should be assumed to have an implicit YEA vote cast by their tabler? (YEA/NAY IMPLICIT)

My friends in content, do you accept that in the event of a tie, the status quo shall dominate and the motions will be considered as failed? (YEA/NAY TIE)

5
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

IMPLICIT:

YEAS 1

NAYS 1

TIE

Since TIE failed does this mean the YEAS have it?

2
pmjvreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I think that instead of yae nae, the arrowclicks should be counted

5
‮zcm🍰reply
lemmy.world

Doesn't the number of arrowclicks depend on one's relative position in this fediverse?

5
jdrreply

There is no privileged frame of reference, whether the arrows point up or down, or are red or blue depends on your relative velocity and orientation.

5
‮zcm🍰reply
lemmy.world

The number you see may be different for two accounts on two different servers, right?

5
pmjvreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Is that how it works? Japanese Jesus, this protocol is cursed.

5
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

The speaker finds this out-of-order as the procedure for voting has already been agreed upon.

3
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

The whole goddamn system is out of order

2
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

I think that the default should be to change something in the event of a tie. This status quo business is what the British parliament does, and I'm worried we might end up like them.

4
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Putting my money where my mouth is

YEA IMPLICIT

YEA TIE

3
lemmy.sdf.org

I want lemmy renamed to lynyrd. it's a better name.

5
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

This is my favourite sublynny

3
pieguyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

As cool as "lynyrd" sounds, I fear it is not in the powers of FUCC to change it

2

even if we go all grassroots? go door to door, getting signatures. getting elected to the lemmy board, then bribing all the opponents, and finally changing the name to lynyrd.

it can be done.

3
lemmy.wtf

I am watching the old anime called "Captain Future" and came to the conclusion that it would be greatly improved with some hentai.

4

The speaker makes no comment about the potential for improvement, though it is not believed to be something that FUCC has the power to influence

4