Spyke
politics·politics byMicroWave

Gavin Newsom calls for national billionaires tax: 'It's time for an economic reset'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called for a nationwide tax on billionaires as part of a broader “economic reset for America.”

Newsom, who is considered to be a 2028 presidential contender, also reiterated his opposition to a state-level wealth tax that Californians will vote on in November.

He also called for creating a “national public equity fund” to help “ensure every American owns a stake in the future being built by AI.”

Gavin Newsom calls for national billionaires tax: 'It's time for an economic reset'https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/26/gavin-newsom-national-billionaires-tax-california.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.world

I believe, and this is as diplomatic as I care to be, that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state and that a national approach could prevent that.

On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.

60
WatDabneyreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale

I think that's more likely

That's really pretty standard Democrat fake leftist strategy - only openly advocate for a leftist proposal when there's no chance that it'll pass.

36
lemmy.ca

Isn't it a fake leftist strategy is to argue against voting for anyone that wants to tax billionaires?

1

It's a leftist strategy to call out two faced billionaire friendly Democrats like Gavin fucking Newsom

2
naoreply
sh.itjust.works

that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state

If they are not paying taxes anyway, why would that even matter?

7
Brkdncrreply
lemmy.world

It’s not that they are providing $0 in tax income, it’s that it’s nearly 0%. It’s still a chunk of change.

I’ve heard that we wouldn’t feel the impact for 25 years.

Even so, kick them out. They can live in beautiful Houston Texas, or sunny Arkansas. Or maybe they will decide paying up is worth the cost of being a resident of California

11

once he become president he is going to champion a world billionaire tax and say no to a national one.

2

On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.

The idiots, aka 99%of voters, will only remember him promoting the national billionaire tax.

3

We don't even need a billionaire's tax for an "economic reset". I mean, we do because it's not healthy for our economy or our political system. But what will happen with a billionaire's tax? The money will just go to the government, which will spend it in arcane ways that the average person has little visibility or voice on.

What we need is an increase to the minimum wage to whatever it would've been if it hadn't been consistently frozen and re-frozen and with mandatory CoLA, universal healthcare, repeal of Citizens United, repeal of whatever decision it was that said a company's ultimate responsibility is to shareholders, a breakup of a whole bunch of overweighted conglomerates, a breakup of media empires, a ban on "entertainment" masquerading as "news", a reform of the Supreme Court, vetc. There's a whole bunch of other stuff as well. But there's a whole bunch of stuff that could get accomplished without a billionaire's tax.

3
lemmy.world

wasn't this asshole against the billionaire tax in California?

41
piefed.blahaj.zone

Yes, but then he realized that showing his whole ass before his presidential campaign/election was a bad strategy. He's in damage control mode. If elected, I'm sure he'll flip back to not wanting it again.

47

"Now is not the time. We have more important matters to focus on"

Gets nothing done regarding any of those matters.

30

It's all a smokescreen. He's not proposing a national wealth tax, just another minimum income tax. Which they won't care about because they don't earn significant income.

Newsom said he supports “a true minimum tax on billionaires — a modern Buffett Rule — that ensures the people at the very top pay at least the tax rate their own workers pay.”

8

So he’s against the state level one that actually has a chance of passing, but for a national one that has zero chance, neat.

20
lemmy.beru.co

Fine words, but does he have the credibility to back it up?

5

You reached the end