Spyke

States are changing fire codes to make housing cheaper. Some safety experts are worried.

States and cities are loosening building code requirements in an effort to lower construction costs and boost affordable housing.

Some of these changes include allowing low-rise apartment buildings to have just one stairway, reducing how often building codes are updated and rolling back specific electrical or fire safety standards.

But critics have raised safety concerns, noting that existing rules were shaped by past tragedies and aim to prevent future harm.

For example, having only one staircase could allow a developer to add another unit or expand the size of units, said Nicolle Aube, principal and founder of Civex, a planning and civil engineering consulting firm, and an American Planning Association board member.

“But then there’s this flip side, that by removing these codes and protections, it carries this additional risk for the developer and the occupants of the building if the worst-case scenario happens,” she said.

Many states are considering single-stairway apartment laws.

They generally take one of four approaches, said Alex Horowitz, housing policy director at The Pew Charitable Trusts: begin with a study, allow single-stairway buildings statewide, update the state building code while letting local governments opt out, or give localities authority to allow them. Pew has lobbied for and testified in favor of the changes.

Two national developments could make it easier for more states and cities to allow single-stairway buildings, Horowitz said.

The first are proposed updates by the International Code Council, the organization that develops the model codes many states use as the basis for their building rules. An update to its multifamily code, for example, would allow single-stairway buildings to add a fourth story.

Second, the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act moving through Congress would direct the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to develop model guidelines for residential buildings with a single stairway not exceeding six stories.

According to Pew, 19 states and Washington, D.C., introduced bills between 2022 and 2025 to study or allow single-stairway apartment buildings, and seven states passed them in 2025 alone.

This year, Idaho enacted a new law that allows local governments to permit certain apartment buildings to use one stairway — generally up to six stories without an occupiable roof, or five stories with one, along with limits on units per floor, sprinklers, stair width, and smoke and fire detection.

Colorado’s law enacted last year requires certain municipalities to modify their building codes by Dec. 1, 2027, to allow five-story multifamily residential buildings to be served by a single exit. Texas’ 2025 law lets municipalities authorize single-stairway apartment buildings up to six stories.

Colorado state Rep. Andrew Boesenecker, a Democrat who sponsored the new law, came to this issue because the state needed to find a way to make smaller multifamily projects more feasible. He said the policy can help on infill lots where a traditional two-stairway apartment building may not fit.

“Single stairway or smart stairway buildings are not only a very safe way to build multi-family housing, they also bring a product to market that’s just not being offered,” Boesenecker said.

Colorado is one 16 states without a statewide building code, making local implementation a major focus. Boesenecker said lawmakers had to look at “ways that you can make it feasible through local governments to adopt this standard into their building code.”

He said the work to get the support of those skeptical of single-staircase legislation happened a year prior to the bill’s passage, when lawmakers worked with fire chiefs, fire marshals and firefighters’ unions for about a year to get them to a “neutral position” on the bill.

In Texas, Democratic state Sen. Nate Johnson said the law he sponsored will allow for architectural innovation as well as maximizing multi-family housing on odd-shaped and smaller lots.

Johnson said modernizing building codes does not come at the risk of safety.

“Who knows what policies once served well and now, after decades of technological advances and changes in land use, impede good design?” Johnson said. “We have regulations for a reason, and I’m not for throwing out what protects the public. Markets tend to easily meet the challenges of sound regulatory protections.”

Lawmakers in Illinois, New York and Rhode Island considered single-stairway bills this year, but none passed before the legislatures adjourned for the year.

But moving in the opposite direction, Connecticut lawmakers this year repealed the single-stairway law they had passed in 2024, after objections from fire safety officials.

Beyond staircases, Horowitz, of Pew, said this year saw the first legislative sessions in which states have taken a look at elevators to reduce building costs. Washington state enacted a new elevator law this year that directs the state’s Building Code Council to allow smaller apartment buildings, with at most six stories and 24 units, to use smaller and less expensive passenger elevators.

Maine removed some elevator-related requirements, including for certain smoke and draft equipment and for two-way emergency video communication systems inside elevators.

Research by the Center for Building in North America, a nonprofit research group that co-authored Pew’s single-stairway report, found that installing elevators in the United States and Canada is at least three times as expensive as in Western Europe or East Asia. U.S. and Canadian installations start around $150,000, compared with roughly $50,000 in several high-income countries, the group found.

https://stateline.org/2026/06/22/states-are-changing-fire-codes-to-make-housing-cheaper-some-safety-experts-are-worried/Open linkView original on piefed.blahaj.zone

If fire blocks off the only means of egress in an apartment complex, it blocks off the only way for people to escape, the best way for firefighters to go attack the fire and rescue people, and makes saving everyone very difficult. You ever think of someone your grandma's age trying to get out a window on a ladder while smoke is all over the place? While there's 20 other people trying to get out the same way?

Like an extra apartment or two in a building is going to make rent go down. Bullshit.

2

Must think we need new material for the textbooks since the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory and MGM Grand fires are so dated.

18

Isn't singe-staircase the norm in most countries? Doesn't seem to be a huge issue that I've heard of...

5

Pretty sure most countries don't have builders cutting as many corners as the US does as a regular business model. They regularly cut safety corners in obvious ways all the time and local and state inspectors sign off anyway.

There's an entire segment of tik tok, yt shorts, reels, etc. that's just home inspectors calling them out with video evidence for egregious safety issues that were approved anyway, and builders just refusing to repair things because that would cost them money. Gas lines leaking, in an entire neighborhood, not just one or two buildings. And those leaking gas meters being installed immediately next to electrical panels, well within safety distances, often with their own electrical problems. Builders replacing tripping GFCI or Arc Fault breakers with standard ones instead of fixing the issue causing it. Or my personal favorite, using aluminum wire with insulation that pulls back exposing the wire when heated, in the AZ desert. Aluminum wiring stopped being used in most places back in the 1970s because of fires from that issue. An entire new neighborhood in the Phoenix area burned to the ground while still being built because of that. Broken roof trusses being held together with poorly driven nails barely touching the wood, or in some instances not even actually holding things together at all. Perimeter block walls that don't even have grout holding the blocks together at all.

US builders can't even do the simplest of the bare minimums required by code as it is. And it's not just one company, it's all of the big names.

Trusting a US builder to make a safe house is like giving a toddler a loaded handgun with no safety.

5
reddthat.com

Is it? It seems like the people responsible for fire safety are against it and that they are looking to study it with pilot programs, not that they already have data supporting it.

I can see how certain advancements might make the need for two stairways less crucial, but I don't love the idea of using people, likely lower income people, as fire safety testers. Especially since the benefit seems more about making things more financially sound for builders. Maybe we shouldn't sacrifice people to literal flames so that huge companies can make some extra profit. I am open to data saying that it's fine, I just don't see that any was presented.

8
fpslemreply
lemmy.world

Multifamily building in most US jurisdictions already requires fire sprinklers, plus modern firewalls and materials, making them much safer than the old single stair constructions from 100 years ago. Egress concerns are typically addressed via emergency window egress up to 5 stories or so. And as others have said, single stair is the norm in Europe, with good fire safety records.

https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2025/02/small-single-stairway-apartment-buildings-have-strong-safety-record

5

Thank you for the link. Have not read through the whole thing, but it seems like it was well researched with regard to fire safety. I take some issue with the idea that the main problem with the housing market is that we need more houses, but the stats on safety seem pretty solid.

3

You reached the end

States are changing fire codes to make housing cheaper. Some safety experts are worried. | Spyke