Spyke
lemmy.nz

If you are wondering: LVT = Taxing the value of the land instead of the buildings and everything on it (Capital Value / CV) which encourages people to improve the land and revitalise the city instead of just sitting on empty lots or dilapidated buildings waiting for the land value to go up (land banking). This usually leads to more housing and lower prices and generally a better vibe.

☝️ After reading the comments I realised we were all talking about it like everyone knows what it is so I just dropped this here for anyone that stumbles by.

4
lemmy.nz

The extra stupid part of CV is that improvements wear out and depreciate... yet the house I live was probably built for $40k in the 80's and is CV'd at ten time that.

Apparently I'm taxed based on the replacement cost, which is only of practical importance to my insurer.

3

Your CV should be split into land value and improvements value (which I believe also includes landscaping, retaining walls, etc). So you can see what the council thinks it's worth.

Inflation has devalued the dollar significantly since 1980. $40k in 1980 had the purchasing power of about $240k now. I would fully expect that the CV would have your improvements at much less than that.

Our previous house was a 4 bedroom 50s house that had been extended multiple times from the original state house, and it was valued at around $700k or something. Of that, the improvements were valued at $80k and the rest was the land value. Replacement cost would have easily been hundreds of thousands.

2
lemmy.nz

Hmmmm.

I don't live there anymore; do they already split land and improvements like they do in Taupō?

3

The Hutt Valley does this, they have a land and improvement value. I'm not sure what the split is though.

3
aim_at_mereply
lemmy.nz

Yeah they do. But its relatively skewed towqrds improvement rather than land. Makes it less attractive to develop.

4

You reached the end

Wellington City Council considers sweeping rates changes | Spyke