Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

10 replies

lemmy.world

Christ, it's not even close. Next they'll sue them for selling apples.

27
lemmy.world

Wow, not close at all. If Apple wins this that means pretty much no one can use any kind of apple for their logo. That's not fair.

17

it's like they replaced their lawyers with a ML model, the AI said "iconography of an apple" and it crapped out a lawsuit.

7
lemmy.world

Sadly this is more a symptom of how trademark law works. There's a "use it or lose it" aspect that compels brands to fiercely, overzealously defend their logo against any that look even remotely similar, or they risk losing their hold over it.

Brands don't do it for their own satisfaction; really the bad press it can generate is often enough to see any case dropped — but what matters is that they show an effort to 'defend' their trademark.

16

Trademarks are for a specific line of trade, though, as the name implies. Apple isn't in the fruit or food business at all as far as I know. Not sure whether this is different in the EU (or Switzerland, which I guess isn't part of the EU).

Their application doesn't list any businesses related to agriculture.

4

I view apple not as badly as Nestle but definity getting up there

13

You reached the end

Apple is suing Swiss fruit farmer over a decades-old apple logo | Spyke